It still baffles me how bad our recruiting was - I mean we had the best hydration stations.
As I recall, at the time, and considering where our offense was at, Kill was a very good hire, as the goal became not to be exciting but to stay in games.OC Kill was his biggest mistake and much worse than OC Mehringer.
Although a bad hire, the process behind OC Mehringer was correct - an open, fast offense that prioritized speed and scoring.
He needed to be replaced by someone with the same mindset.
The process for OC Kill was "slow down the offense, don't try and score points, let the defense control the game, dont risk turnovers by passing the ball"
How has that worked out for the past 5 years since?
Note - Time of Possession per drive and by game was basically the same.
A "slow" 3 and out is still under 2min of gametime and tires out the defense.
As I recall, at the time, and considering where our offense was at, Kill was a very good hire, as the goal became not to be exciting but to stay in games.
Jerry Kill just lost his home opener. To visiting UMASS.
Is there some hidden meaning in your post? let's play a version of f, kill marry with OCs .You sure?
Looks like NMSU had 31:34 in TOP while UMass only had 28:15. That's all that matters.
Clearly a win for NMSU.
![]()
It still baffles me how bad our recruiting was - I mean we had the best hydration stations.
Not everybody at the time loved it. There were those of us who weren't so bullish.We love the mehringer hire here
I'm reserving judgement until I see what's on the field, but I agree that Mehringer is a bit of a head-scratcher for OC right now.
From P5 grad assistant in 2013, to a FCS Co-OC in 2014, to a G5 WR coach in 2015, to a P5 OC in 2016.... that's a pretty meteoric rise, and may be unprecedented (grad assistant to P5 OC in 3 years). I'm sure hoping we're catching lightning in a bottle, but I can't help but think about the risk involved in this hire. Hope the concerns are unfounded - but I can't ignore them right now.
Need to see what goes out on the field this year and next.
You called it !Not everybody at the time loved it. There were those of us who weren't so bullish.