Proved a failed, racist CFO and Bronze Tablet wrong too. It’s noteworthy that your derangement doesn't allow you to answer Best's question: What exactly did Biden do better that you love him so much and wanted desperately to vote for 4 more years of Joe?
Grok:
Gunther Eagleman's profile (@GuntherEagleman
, real name David J. Freeman) is not a trustworthy source of information in any objective or journalistic sense.He is a highly partisan MAGA-aligned influencer and political commentator who openly promotes "America First" views, strong pro-Trump messaging, and criticism of Democrats, liberals, mainstream media ("fake news"), climate change policies, and related topics. His content is often presented in sensational, all-caps style to maximize engagement, focusing on outrage, conspiratorial angles, and unfiltered takes rather than balanced or verified reporting.Multiple independent sources and fact-checking efforts indicate frequent issues with accuracy:
- His posts have repeatedly spread or endorsed debunked claims on topics like elections (e.g., 2020 "stolen" narratives), COVID/vaccines, climate change (calling it a "hoax"), and other conspiracies.
- He ranks highly on Community Notes corrections on X (e.g., one analysis placed him in the top tier for notes debunking his claims), showing community-driven pushback on misinformation.
- Critics across platforms (including analyses from sites tracking disinformation, anti-vax misinformation trackers like VAXOPEDIA, and NATO-related reports on broader propaganda ecosystems) describe him as part of networks that amplify misleading or conspiratorial content, sometimes tied to far-right or grievance-driven narratives.
- Some outlets and users label him a "rage baiter," propagandist, or someone who profits from extreme MAGA engagement farming rather than factual discourse.
While he occasionally calls out what he sees as "fake news" from others (and his followers treat his takes as "fact checks" in echo-chamber contexts), this is selective and partisan—not evidence of reliability. Trustworthy sources prioritize evidence, transparency, corrections when wrong, and minimal bias; his profile operates more as advocacy/entertainment for a specific audience.
If you're evaluating info from his account, always cross-check with primary sources, multiple outlets (including those with opposing views), or direct fact-checkers. Blind reliance on it risks exposure to unverified or exaggerated claims common in high-engagement partisan spaces.