Nuh uh.
Yeah, not even getting jabbed a couple of times reduces that %.
Nuh uh.
Not a question of IF, but WHEN and HOW ??There is a 100% chance that every person that's posted on this thread will die.
Accept that as a fact. No link required.
sounds like trash technician is the better option for you.I'm a long time ICU RN and sometimes I do take out the trash when needed.
I don't really care about people getting the vaccine other than my family and friends. It's a personal choice.
I will say that Covid + numbers are rising in my facility as well as the others in the city.
People not getting the vaccine is job security, just like smokers...
Of course he doesWhat right? He simply refused a vaccine and was fired. I don't see the "right" there. I guess he certainly had the right to go against his employer.
His choiceThat isn't totally true either. He can be compelled to have the vaccine.
Who died due to the vaccine?
slow down my friend...There is a 100% chance that every person that's posted on this thread will die.
Accept that as a fact. No link required.
Not so fast my friend. When all the misinformed fools decline the vaccine - which is the scientific godsend of the young century (on that note, imagine idiots refusing the polio vaccine decades ago), it makes it less likely that my kids will be able to go to in person schools in the fall. Rights are not without responsibilities and end when they intrude on others’ well being.Also I’m not looking through 5 pages but even Deandre Hopkins, a top 5 receiver in the league is contemplating quitting. It’s nice to see people stand up to this ***** *** ********, if you want it go get it and if you don’t you shouldn’t have too. Both my parents, nearly 60 in age have the vaccine, but they’re not scared of Covid, they got it because they want the world back to normal and to protect themselves, I don’t have it and I’m not getting it(28, healthy, and have had Covid). Every argument I’ve ever heard is “my body my choice” but not with the vaccine. It’s so funny how the narratives change. Seriously, if you wanna protect YOURSELF, go get it, if you don’t want to put the vaccine in your body don’t. And that is the right way to view things. Do what is best for yourself, and that’s all you can do in life.
Not so fast my friend. When all the misinformed fools decline the vaccine - which is the scientific godsend of the young century (on that note, imagine idiots refusing the polio vaccine decades ago), it makes it less likely that my kids will be able to go to in person schools in the fall. Rights are not without responsibilities and end when they intrude on others’ well being.
Once the vaccines are FDA approved, they will be required in schools and likely many other places as they should be. As are other vaccines. I mean seriously, can you imagine in the 50s if right wing media was around and convinced all the dudes that the polio vaccine was the devil? Be a bunch of cripps hopping around at the Republican convention that’s for sure. You folks act like you’ve never heard of a vaccine.
Anecdotes don't stand up nearly as well as the hundreds of thousands of folks who've been assessed via stringent research papers and the millions who have been monitored after vaccine rollout late last year.
One or two examples of any perceived side effects can be pure chance. Seriously, it happens all the time because life is messy. That's why we need large samples and carefully crafted studies to eliminate bias as much as possible. I work at a university. It's likely that 90%+ of the ~150 people I interact with on a monthly basis now have gotten both jabs (or one of J&J, of course). Know how many had any noticeable, long-term side effects? None. And yes, I've asked nearly all of them. Molecular biologists who will know more about immune function and vaccines than I ever will were basically in line as soon as doses came to town.
Same with my family. Hell, my gun-toting, outlaw country-loving uncle got his shot the minute it was available. No side effects.
The fact of the matter remains that long-term impacts of the virus are KNOWN to be detrimental. We've got folks like Kirk Herbstreit who still have no sense of taste or smell. Brain fog and lethargy are additional detriments. Lung scarring and organ damage caused by the virus and low O2 levels will impact global healthcare for decades. Even asymptomatic cases have been shown to inflame the heart while mild cases have reduced gray matter in the brain (recent study). Clots are an issue, too.
We now live in a time when people who are on an ICU bed or are about to be intubated are still pushing anti-vax rhetoric. Maybe they're trying to become martyrs, maybe they're just stubborn. It's damn difficult for people to admit when they've made serious mistakes. I feel like more people would come out as pro-vaccine if a lot of folks on the left would just stop being a bunch of dicks and a lot of folks on the right would look at the consequences of their actions. Seriously, to any liberals and leftists who are guilty of saying "I told you so" as someone's loved one is LITERALLY drowning in their own fluids, that's about as horrific and detrimental to our cause than anything I can think of. It's a small percentage. Kinda like the vocal basketball fans that threaten and berate college players. But still. Think before you type. I digress.
---
Masking was literally the least we could've asked for. Folks refused. Vaccination is a better alternative (both is even better), but still folks refused (and now the Delta variant is likely going to shut a lot of stuff down again this winter). Fox News folks are starting to come forward and promote the vaccine. I don't know if it's a lack of Trump or the realization that this ****'s about to hit their base hard, but they're slowly beginning to talk positively about the vaccine. The Alabama governor... ALABAMA, has started talking about the vaccine's benefits. This isn't going away soon, and it certainly isn't going away before it takes out a LOT more people.
Israel has a ton vaxxed. Delta is breaking through. LA has a ton vaxxed. Breaking through. Vaccines are still effective, but the Delta variant has altered spike proteins which helps it bypass the OG vaccines. The summer was nice while the vaccines held, but until we get the updated booster shots, I think we're right back to where we were before last fall.
I know I might not change your mind. I really do. But, I'd like to take a moment to ask you as someone who cares about Kentuckians and BBN, that you carry an open mind.
Be well.![]()
Ok. Appreciate you letting me know your viewpoints. Now I know. You people act like you’ve never dealt with a virus… SARS, Covid, the Flu, etc. no one has ever walked around with a stupid ****ing mask on for over a year for any of those, and everyone seems just fine. If I get the vaccine I’m not protecting anyone besides ME, I’m not protecting my neighbor, I’m not protecting you, I’m protecting one person, ME. Just as everyone else is that got it. And guess what I don’t care, I don’t care that my parents got the vaccine, I don’t care if you got the vaccine, I love my family, I love my neighbor and their children, but I’m not gonna be forced to do anything by a government that doesn’t have my well being in their best interest. Once again, everyone should do what’s best for themselves and the ones they love and they’ll be fine.
Of course, no vaccine has ever been 100% effective.
Unless a law is passed to prevent it, businesses can require vaccination for employees and customers.
This in BOLD is the BIGGEST TRUTH anyone has posted on here. Thank you for cutting through the bullsht, ACE5
Lol FreedomFirstNetwork…reliable news I’m sure.
Just as I thought. Good luck with your facebook medical degree.
You wouldn't know otherwise unless CNN said so
This whole thread is (supposed to be) about health yet Ivermectin is mocked for its ability to rid organisms of parasites.So you would eat the horse dewormer on a cracker also for Covid?
That's what the his Freedom First Network is promoting.
Really seeing why our country has declined intellectually.
No people are mocked for believing Ivermectin for roundworms is a cure for Covid.This whole thread is (supposed to be) about health yet Ivermectin is mocked for its ability to rid organisms of parasites.
You do that, friend.LOL
Reads like a GRRMartin novel.
EVERYONE HERE cares about Kentuckians and BBN, even care about the Cards fans. That's why some that have studied this stuff DON'T want people to get the shot, but support their decision if they do.
You can ignore the data that doesn't fit your beliefs. That's your right to do so. I'm going to keep my mind open to ALL of the data, past present and future, regardless of whether it soothes anyone's faith in pharmaceuticals.
Glad he got fired. Political dogma has over taken common sense.
He doesn't want the vax, fine, bet they don't have trouble filling his position.
Attitudes like his are why we're about national mandates again. Trumpian oan nonsense.
Their logic is that letting people go and live how they want will result in outbreaks in facilities and among workforces.Oh?
One group of people want left alone and the power to choose. The second group wants to force their will and opinion on the first. Yet somehow the first group is in the wrong?
Live your life like you want and let others do the same. That isn't hard yet the second group will have none of it.
Employers don't have a tough decision at all. Why should an employer be involved in my health decisions?
This is a viking decision but it's in place because of the absurd NFL policy. Players are pushing back. Good for them.
Their logic is that letting people go and live how they want will result in outbreaks in facilities and among workforces.
That could lead to future liability, long-term medical complications that could impact careers, and significant turnover. Not saying there's the possibility of significant turnover in the NFL, but the point remains viable in other sectors and industries.
Half a workforce not getting vaccinated puts the other half at risk. The Delta variant can break through our current 2-dose vaxes. They still convey a lot of protection, but slightly less now that they did with Alpha or UK COVID. So, even if someone got their shots, other employees/players could pass the variant on to them and then they pass it along to their loved ones.
Liable for what?Yep. They can also be held liable by those that are compelled to get it.
In late June, my former employer had 68 shifts of overtime to cover in a single building because of people out with Covid, none of who were vaccinated. One of my friends works in that building and is livid that he and others are having to pay for the arrogant stupidity and stubbornness of the unvaccinated. Last year anyone at work who got Covid or had to quarantine because of it didn't have to use sick time for it. At bare minimum, I'm guessing that policy will change if you are unvaccinated. If it gets too bad they may start telling people to get vaccinated or find another job. That's a personal choice, right?Their logic is that letting people go and live how they want will result in outbreaks in facilities and among workforces.
That could lead to future liability, long-term medical complications that could impact careers, and significant turnover. Not saying there's the possibility of significant turnover in the NFL, but the point remains viable in other sectors and industries.
Half a workforce not getting vaccinated puts the other half at risk. The Delta variant can break through our current 2-dose vaxes. They still convey a lot of protection, but slightly less now that they did with Alpha or UK COVID. So, even if someone got their shots, other employees/players could pass the variant on to them and then they pass it along to their loved ones.
I'm sorry but if you think vaccinations don't affect those you come in contact with, you simply don't understand vaccines. You affect the people around you one way or the other.Ok. Appreciate you letting me know your viewpoints. Now I know. You people act like you’ve never dealt with a virus… SARS, Covid, the Flu, etc. no one has ever walked around with a stupid ****ing mask on for over a year for any of those, and everyone seems just fine. If I get the vaccine I’m not protecting anyone besides ME, I’m not protecting my neighbor, I’m not protecting you, I’m protecting one person, ME. Just as everyone else is that got it. And guess what I don’t care, I don’t care that my parents got the vaccine, I don’t care if you got the vaccine, I love my family, I love my neighbor and their children, but I’m not gonna be forced to do anything by a government that doesn’t have my well being in their best interest. Once again, everyone should do what’s best for themselves and the ones they love and they’ll be fine.
I'd be careful using Jacobsen as a rational for your argument. While its a thing it's not a good one. Almost every atrocity our government has committed used Jacobsen as it's base argument. The list includes segregation, forced internment of Japanese citizens in WWII, stealing native Americans land and more. Jacobsen hasn't been over turned yet but it should be.You need to read the Jacobsen case.
You used an apology of noncontagious disease to support employer pitfalls with covid vaccines? Why?If the vaccine works as stated, there will not be an issue. People get sick. It's unavoidable.
Maybe employers should fire or not hire anyone with a family history of cancer or heart disease? Or a bad food allergy? After all, someone could have accidentally leave a smudge of peanut butter on a door handle. Or maybe we just don't hire anyone with any physical disability?
As a society our attention span shrunk and with it our ability to see further than the end of our nose.
In working age people, there is a very small chance of a serious case and virtually zero chance of death. So no need to worry on those fronts. Also anyone concerned has the ability to get the vaccine if they choose. So the only concern left are cases.
Vaccines were made to prevent serious cases not to eliminate covid. The latter is not a realistic outcome. Delta shows how great the virus is at working around existing protection; and future variants will be even better. Exposure is and always was a near certainty.
So if serious cases/death are a non issue and exposure is certain (therefore not a variable); then what's left? That's right - nothing. Well except control of course. The desire to make someone do what you think they should do.
Personal choice must always be the rule, minus limited extreme circumstances. A virus with 99% survival rate and vaccines far less than 100% effective against transmission do not warrant extreme circumstances.
Overturned? No, I think it should be applied more narrowly. There really are times when government has compelling reasons for typically unconstitutional acts. The bar should be pretty high.I'd be careful using Jacobsen as a rational for your argument. While its a thing it's not a good one. Almost every atrocity our government has committed used Jacobsen as it's base argument. The list includes segregation, forced internment of Japanese citizens in WWII, stealing native Americans land and more. Jacobsen hasn't been over turned yet but it should be.
In general you are correct but when communicable disease is the issue, other factors come into play.Oh?
One group of people want left alone and the power to choose. The second group wants to force their will and opinion on the first. Yet somehow the first group is in the wrong?
Live your life like you want and let others do the same. That isn't hard yet the second group will have none of it.
Employers don't have a tough decision at all. Why should an employer be involved in my health decisions?
This is a viking decision but it's in place because of the absurd NFL policy. Players are pushing back. Good for them.
1. The issue is one of probability. Yes, people will get sick. Working in an unvaccinated environment, even if one is vaccinated, exponentially increases the likelihood of getting infected.1. If the vaccine works as stated, there will not be an issue. People get sick. It's unavoidable.
2. Maybe employers should fire or not hire anyone with a family history of cancer or heart disease? Or a bad food allergy? After all, someone could have accidentally leave a smudge of peanut butter on a door handle. Or maybe we just don't hire anyone with any physical disability?
As a society our attention span shrunk and with it our ability to see further than the end of our nose.
3. In working age people, there is a very small chance of a serious case and virtually zero chance of death. So no need to worry on those fronts. Also anyone concerned has the ability to get the vaccine if they choose. So the only concern left are cases.
4. Vaccines were made to prevent serious cases not to eliminate covid. The latter is not a realistic outcome. Delta shows how great the virus is at working around existing protection; and future variants will be even better. Exposure is and always was a near certainty.
5. So if serious cases/death are a non issue and exposure is certain (therefore not a variable); then what's left? That's right - nothing. Well except control of course. The desire to make someone do what you think they should do.
6. Personal choice must always be the rule, minus limited extreme circumstances. A virus with 99% survival rate and vaccines far less than 100% effective against transmission do not warrant extreme circumstances.
Are you so sure? There is certainly enough positive to require more analysis. https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93485No people are mocked for believing Ivermectin for roundworms is a cure for Covid.
Maybe I need to get into the snake oil business, seems to be plenty rubes in the market.
![]()
The empirical data out there contradicts your “I’ve seen vaccinated people in our office who got it”. But the properly blinded studies to directly test susceptibility to infection and risk of transmission are just now underway, so I guess we’ll have to wait until those results are reported. I bet we find there is a significant reduction in infection and transmission among vaccinated vs unvaccinated. If not, I’ll admit I was wrong.Except that it doesn't. I've watched it with my own eyes. It doesn't stop anyone from catching or passing. Now ... if you want to talk severity, maybe you have an argument for ppl to get the vaccine. That, at this point, should be a personal choice. But, the "vaccine" does not stop someone from catching or passing. Even our med group stated that back in March.
It should be extremely high and utilized in critical matters of national security, national health, and emergencies above and beyond what we could expect to see in any given year. I'd say a 100 year pandemic fits the bill.Overturned? No, I think it should be applied more narrowly. There really are times when government has compelling reasons for typically unconstitutional acts. The bar should be pretty high.
Not really. I didn't say about empirical data, but rather one factual observation. I didn't say my observation was the average or within a std dev or two. It may be an outlier for all i know. The point was, vax'd people can, and do, still catch and spread. The empirical data doesn't contradict my observation. The data may outweigh it, that would be fair.The empirical data out there contradicts your “I’ve seen vaccinated people in our office who got it”. But the properly blinded studies to directly test susceptibility to infection and risk of transmission are just now underway, so I guess we’ll have to wait until those results are reported. I bet we find there is a significant reduction in infection and transmission among vaccinated vs unvaccinated. If not, I’ll admit I was wrong.