look, i get it. new = exciting and a draw for recruits, but our ugly uniforms dont seem to be making a noticeable impact on recruiting. we will most likely finish in the bottom 4 in recruiting again. people arent against new uniforms, people are against tacky, gimmicky ******** uniforms. new doesnt have to be ugly. why cant we give the players uniforms that dont look like ****?
we are not shitting on the idea of new uniforms....we are shitting on the idea of ugly uniforms. they dont have to be mutually exclusive. im a proponent of new unis because it gets the players excited and like you say, rewards them, but it doesnt mean we shouldnt have an opinion about how we appear to the nation. if we had uniforms that made those wearing them look good, think about the impact that would have to recruiting. looking as good as possible will attract more recruits than anything less than that. people are tired of the gimmicky stuff, and i dont blame them. its about winning football games not a contest to see who can get away with wearing the most ocularly offensive garb that we can throw together. as a side note, i dont see the player excitement about these special uniforms. compare the dan mullen year 1 era uniform reveal to the eb and snowbowl uniform reveals:
vs this:
look at how wooden and uninspired russell and banks look. zero energy, zero excitement, almost as if they were frozen in time with no expression on their lifeless faces. these two dont look excited to be wearing the new stuff.**