Hmmmm
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
She's either corrupt or incompetent.
Trump v. Clinton..... can't wait.....
God help us all.
When I was out at lunch today I considered changing my registration from "independent" to "democrat" so I could vote against her in the primaries.
I keep thinking people will wake up regarding Trump or else I'd change it to republican, I don't have the same confidence regarding Clinton.
Has this been snopes'd yet? If this is real, it's basically open and shut at this point. ***** be going to the pokey.
I
I don't understand how this isn't all the news is talking about right now. Further, I don't understand how she hasn't been indicted yet.
Probably because there is still a mountain of evidence to go through. I'd wager though she'll walk and it will all be brushed off.
So I wonder how much this will be talked about today or if the release on Friday was premature?
Nope. I keep telling you guys, the "I'm Ready for Hillary" stuff started showing up around here about two minutes after Obama finished taking the oath in 2013. Looks like we're going to have one helluva flaming bag of poo to choose between come November, unless something changes in the primaries.
Is there any proof/clues that they are discussing a classified document(s)? I assume "TPs" are talking points? Would those really be classified? I doubt it.
Not sure it does any good for the public to play amateur sleuth. Let the professionals handle it.
Yes ...
First they are talking about having trouble sending them via secure fax ... which you wouldn't use for non-classified information.
Then, they discuss removing the headers and sending non-secure. With a classified document there is something in the header and footer to indicate classification level. "For Official Use Only" "Sensitive but Unclassified" "Secret" "Top Secret", etc. If it's FOUO or Unclassified, there would be no need to try to send it via secure fax in the first place, and also no reason to strip the headers and send unsecure. You could just send it unsecure without stripping the headers.
There aren't explicitly stating it ... but if you know the environment, you can see what they are doing.
Will be interesting to see if the FBI expands their investigation if the Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws. It would be a separate investigation.
Some of you posters remind me of 12 year old boys that ejaculate at the mere sight of a little bit of cleavage.
/insert picture of Chris Hansen
"Why don't you have a seat over there and have a glass of lemonade."
And to take the stupid / arrogant / [insert adjective here] even further, we have a separate secure network for classified e-mail, which, if Hillary had been using State servers instead of Hillarynet, would have eliminated the need for secure fax.
Yes, thank you. I mentioned this several times in previous threads about her email server, but it is a valid point again for this topic.