Year 1: 16-17 (missed tourney)
Year 2: 19-12 (may have missed tourney - COVID)
Year 3: 15-8 (7 seed, lost in first round)
Year 4: 23-10 (5 seed, lost in first round)
Year 5: 31-8 (champ)
Year 6: 37-3 (champ)
To be honest, I'm personally torn on Pope.
- Gets down early in games, seems to be a game preparation issue. It's not just a problem this year or because of injuries.
- Being down 12 or more points in 13 of 19 games against power 4 seems nearly impossible.
- Subbing patterns are terrible.
- Has had some odd interviews, especially after losses
- Incredibly inconsistent game to game (throughout his career, not just here)
- Hasn't proved he can finish better than 5th in his conference
- Has missed out on top recruits and hasn't signed anyone this year (it's still unclear to me if this is a Pope problem or JMI problem or both)
- ...fill in the blank
However, I do think if you give a highly intelligent, highly passionate coach time, especially one that will give everything for the program, he can learn from his mistakes and improve. I get the frustration because I'm incredibly frustrated, and given the choice today, I may opt for a new coach, I'm not sure. I'm far from a sunshine pumper when it comes to Pope.
But at the same time, I do think he has a lot of positives that can translate into championships given time to learn/progress.
- Has proven he can build an elite offense
- He's more passionate about Kentucky than any other coach out there
- Will work his *** off to get better. Will work his *** off to improve his team.
- The type of man and personality you want running your program
- He truly has dealt with an unprecedented amount of injuries, yet still made the s16 last year and has shown he can adapt this year and have some success. We wouldn't be complaining about J. Johnson or Noah playing too much if we had Lowe and/or Kam. We could handle more interior physicality with JQ.
The main point is this:
Look at Hurley's first four years. Fans would've have been far more upset with him than we are with Pope - and now he's now the premier coach. Coach K completely missed the tournament his first 3 years, but they gave him time to come into his own (yes, I know today is different with the transfer portal and one-and-dones. But a 38-47 start, we would have gone nuclear). There's a big list of coaches who had rough starts before winning chips, but their schools gave them the chance to learn and improve. I think Pope can get better, I just hope he does it sooner rather than later.
I'm personally willing to be patient through year 3 if that's what the administration wants to do, but if it's the same story, I'll be begging for a change.
I'd also be good with a change after this year (I just don't think that'll happen)