I’m in the minority here…but I would prefer to keep this group INTACT

Pils86

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2008
1,766
1,315
0
I think you’re selling Mag short. He can handle well enough, certainly as good as Caleb.

It was just not Mag’s role this year due the aforementioned backcourt shitshow.
Mag was improving offensively but has nowhere near the handle of Caleb. Put down the mouse and head to the optometrist.
 

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
4,465
6,660
73
I think you’re selling Mag short. He can handle well enough, certainly as good as Caleb.

It was just not Mag’s role this year due the aforementioned backcourt shitshow.
He is a terrible ballhandler and has no body control. He is constantly running into people, and picking up charges when the ball is in his hands. He is definitely a 4 and not a 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,742
4,250
66
And Caleb and Paul werent also turnover machines? Or, who better to close out opponents’ wing players ? Mag is the closest we have to a 3, no one else comes close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,632
10,740
78
And Caleb and Paul werent also turnover machines? Or, who better to close out opponents’ wing players ? Mag is the closest we have to a 3, no one else comes close.
Caleb was much better than Mag and Hyatt at handling the rock. But Paul is way better than all of them. If he returns that alone gets him on the court provided we don’t recruit impact worthy ball handlers in the portal. Mag is way better than Paul at a lot of things but ball handling isn’t one of them. Your dismissing how much Paul and Caleb played and had the ball in their hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son and Kbee3

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,632
10,740
78
I think you’re selling Mag short. He can handle well enough, certainly as good as Caleb.

It was just not Mag’s role this year due the aforementioned backcourt shitshow.
You need to rewatch the Temple game for a picture of life without Paul or Caleb against a halfway decent team. If Mag or Hyatt could handle at all this wouldn’t have been an issue and Caleb sure wouldn’t have played almost the entire Miami game fresh off injury. We needed him to bring up the ball. Simpson was an early frosh so yes, he’s improved. The other guys are what they are though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
4,465
6,660
73
And Caleb and Paul werent also turnover machines? Or, who better to close out opponents’ wing players ? Mag is the closest we have to a 3, no one else comes close.
Mag can defend 1-4, but he can’t handle the ball. Paul and Caleb were much higher usage, so of course they will have more turnovers.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,632
10,740
78
More PT is no excuse for the atrocious turnovers. Mag is no worse.
If he was no worse - Caleb wouldn’t have played the entire Miami game. Mag would have. Nobody plays the whole damn game like that coming off an injury. We desperately needed Caleb to bring up the ball. There is no other explanation. Mag could not under any circumstance play the 1.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,742
4,250
66
If he was no worse - Caleb wouldn’t have played the entire Miami game. Mag would have. Nobody plays the whole damn game like that coming off an injury. We desperately needed Caleb to bring up the ball. There is no other explanation. Mag could not under any circumstance play the 1.
Who said anything about a 1? I’m saying 3 next year.

Scarlet I agree with that except Griffiths may not be ready to start. I see Hyatt there at first. And I don’t see diva Paul accepting a backup role, so I hope he hangs em up
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,632
10,740
78
Who said anything about a 1? I’m saying 3 next year.

Scarlet I agree with that except Griffiths may not be ready to start. I see Hyatt there at first. And I don’t see diva Paul accepting a backup role, so I hope he hangs em up
The point is, Caleb played the 1 and so did Paul because both are indesputably better ball handlers than Mag. I’m not in turn saying they are great PGs. The point is as it stands right now, Simpson is the only player capable of primary ball handling on the returning roster besides Paul . This is going to translate into PT for Paul if he comes back.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
Who said anything about a 1? I’m saying 3 next year.

Scarlet I agree with that except Griffiths may not be ready to start. I see Hyatt there at first. And I don’t see diva Paul accepting a backup role, so I hope he hangs em up
If Hyatt is starting at the 3 next year that is a really really bad sign

You could argue that hoping Hyatt can somehow become a starting caliber 3 in the B1G in his 6th year in college is more wishful thinking than Gavin being a 5 star who is ready to play and start as a freshman

Hyatt has proven he cannot play the 3 in the B1G effectively and likely doesn't develop much more in year 6 to change that around after being benched for Oskar
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,742
4,250
66
If Hyatt is starting at the 3 next year that is a really really bad sign

You could argue that hoping Hyatt can somehow become a starting caliber 3 in the B1G in his 6th year in college is more wishful thinking than Gavin being a 5 star who is ready to play and start as a freshman

Hyatt has proven he cannot play the 3 in the B1G effectively and likely doesn't develop much more in year 6 to change that around after being benched for Oskar
I said Mag 3, Hyatt 4. Not the other way around. I think Mag can replace Caleb. Hyatt the 4 until Griffiths can replace him, if and when he’s ready.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,742
4,250
66
I said Mag 3, Hyatt 4. Not the other way around. I think Mag can replace Caleb. Hyatt the 4 until Griffiths can replace him, if and when he’s ready. Some of what you responded to was my response to Scarlet
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
28,288
26,873
113
Starting five ideally would he

Transfer guard
Cam
Griffiths
Mag
Cliff

Simpson
Hyatt
Woolfolk

Freshmans

If you can get a transfer 4 too that would be great.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
So what’s your starting 5?
If everyone returns...

Paul Cam Gavin Mag Cliff

If Paul leaves, either Simpson or portal replacement starts depending on who we land

If Cliff leaves, hope we land a stud portal 5 or at least someone decent enough to be interchangeable with Wolf

Simpson playing major minutes off the bench as the offensive spark 6th man

Ndongo in the rotation at 3/4, ideally passing Hyatt in pecking order.

Hyatt maybe larger role early in the season that fades. Could start if Mag isn't ready and Griffiths and Gavin take time to adjust to college ball

Wolf backup 5

Davis Chol likely further down the bench but potential to surprise and contribute more

Portal players TBD


In reality, it is somewhat pointless trying to predict this stuff until we see what the final roster looks like though. Any portal stud will have a big impact on depth chart and rotations
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,742
4,250
66
Starting five ideally would he

Transfer guard
Cam
Griffiths
Mag
Cliff

Simpson
Hyatt
Woolfolk

Freshmans

If you can get a transfer 4 too that would be great.
Don’t see how anyone leaves Simpson out of starting 5. Clearly better than Paul on both ends. We’re not getting a starting guard from the portal with 1 and 2 locked up, whether or not Paul stays and is a backup. Next year when Cam is gone, maybe. Not this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDivision

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
In reality, it is somewhat pointless trying to predict this stuff until we see what the final roster looks like though. Any portal stud will have a big impact on depth chart and rotations

Yup - Paul, Hyatt and Cliff are still uncertainties.
Mag most likely will be 100% or close by November but still an uncertainty.
3 Freshmen would could be impact players
Who comes from the portal? Could they have as big of an impact as Cam did?
Long shot - what if Ace Bailey reclassifies to 2023 and is on campus this fall?
On the bright side - plenty of stuff to wildly speculate about this offseason
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,368
113
Yup - Paul, Hyatt and Cliff are still uncertainties.
Mag most likely will be 100% or close by November but still an uncertainty.
3 Freshmen would could be impact players
Who comes from the portal? Could they have as big of an impact as Cam did?
Long shot - what if Ace Bailey reclassifies to 2023 and is on campus this fall?
On the bright side - plenty of stuff to wildly speculate about this offseason
Lot of questions still. Warren actually mentioned he was considering reclassifying in an article after he committed. Not sure it's likely that either will be it can't be ruled completely out

1 isn’t locked up imo
If Paul leaves we might land a starting caliber PG. Simpson could potentially still beat that person out for the job, but either way we will have major minutes to offer at guard if Paul leaves so we should land someone good

Simpson has a lot of potential and flashed a ton of promise, but he was still an inefficient shooter and has some questions about ball handling and ability to run an offense. He has shown he can definitely get to the basket and get shots up as a scoring guard

We could still use a true PG. I think Davis can be, but he's a true freshman. An experienced PG would be a huge get for the team is Paul's gone otherwise there is a ton of pressure on Simpson
 

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
Lot of questions still. Warren actually mentioned he was considering reclassifying in an article after he committed. Not sure it's likely that either will be it can't be ruled completely out

If Paul leaves we might land a starting caliber PG. Simpson could potentially still beat that person out for the job, but either way we will have major minutes to offer at guard if Paul leaves so we should land someone good

Simpson has a lot of potential and flashed a ton of promise, but he was still an inefficient shooter and has some questions about ball handling and ability to run an offense. He has shown he can definitely get to the basket and get shots up as a scoring guard

We could still use a true PG. I think Davis can be, but he's a true freshman. An experienced PG would be a huge get for the team is Paul's gone otherwise there is a ton of pressure on Simpson
More questions than answers at this point.
It's going to be a fun summer.
 

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,522
2,819
66
Shack--I don't think you're in the minority. Just not in the VOCAL high posting negative on players one here.

This group could be a NCAA contender if back together. A RU rarity over decades. No reason not to make a run with the additions to the fold.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,820
1,391
42
If everyone returns...

Paul Cam Gavin Mag Cliff

If Paul leaves, either Simpson or portal replacement starts depending on who we land

If Cliff leaves, hope we land a stud portal 5 or at least someone decent enough to be interchangeable with Wolf

Simpson playing major minutes off the bench as the offensive spark 6th man

Ndongo in the rotation at 3/4, ideally passing Hyatt in pecking order.

Hyatt maybe larger role early in the season that fades. Could start if Mag isn't ready and Griffiths and Gavin take time to adjust to college ball

Wolf backup 5

Davis Chol likely further down the bench but potential to surprise and contribute more

Portal players TBD


In reality, it is somewhat pointless trying to predict this stuff until we see what the final roster looks like though. Any portal stud will have a big impact on depth chart and rotations
Agree with everything ! It will be fun to shuffle the lineups as we bring transfer players in and get updates on our own guys. We will probably shuffle the lineups on this board 10 times lol.

The one thing is there is no starting 5 with Paul on the ball. On the wing sure, but he can not be our dominant on the ball PG.
 

dconifer0

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2004
4,232
3,256
113
Shack--I don't think you're in the minority. Just not in the VOCAL high posting negative on players one here.

This group could be a NCAA contender if back together. A RU rarity over decades. No reason not to make a run with the additions to the fold.
Just curious -- by "NCAA contender" do you mean a contender to win the national title?
 

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,522
2,819
66
I meant contender to make the tourney.

BUT nowadays with parity and what we have seen this year (and our history of #1 wins etc), any team in the tourney has a chance to go deep, so to clarify, yes with Cliff, Paul, Simpson, Hyatt Griffiths and any portal yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

dconifer0

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2004
4,232
3,256
113
I meant contender to make the tourney.

BUT nowadays with parity and what we have seen this year (and our history of #1 wins etc), any team in the tourney has a chance to go deep, so to clarify, yes with Cliff, Paul, Simpson, Hyatt Griffiths and any portal yes.
I would love to see that. Go Rutgers!
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
25,976
12,150
113
Don’t see how anyone leaves Simpson out of starting 5. Clearly better than Paul on both ends. We’re not getting a starting guard from the portal with 1 and 2 locked up, whether or not Paul stays and is a backup. Next year when Cam is gone, maybe. Not this year.
If Paul returns, he will start just like Caleb.Pikiell likes continuity.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,820
1,391
42
If Paul returns, he will start just like Caleb.Pikiell likes continuity.
I fear the same. Pike rode him this year and cost us a tournament bid. If he returns he will probably do the same. Hopefully on the wing and off the ball
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
29,526
45,769
113
I fear the same. Pike rode him this year and cost us a tournament bid. If he returns he will probably do the same. Hopefully on the wing and off the ball
I guess you would have preferred Jalen Miller playing up to 15 mins a game so they could have rested Paul and let him recover from his injuries?
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,820
1,391
42
I guess you would have preferred Jalen Miller playing up to 15 mins a game so they could have rested Paul and let him recover from his injuries?
Or play the better more athletic PG in Simpson. Pike knew the answer but values loyalty and it cost him and us. Jalen shouldn’t have touched the floor but depth was a problem.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
29,526
45,769
113
Or play the better more athletic PG in Simpson. Pike knew the answer but values loyalty and it cost him and us. Jalen shouldn’t have touched the floor but depth was a problem.
If they sat Paul to rest him due to his injuries for a few games then Miller has to play to spell Derek and Cam. It's not just play Derek...lol. And therein lied the problem once Mag went down, there wasn't enough bench depth to be able to sit Paul or Caleb. Either of them playing was better than the alternative.

BTW Derek should have been playing over Hyatt not Paul. I said that from the minute Mag was lost for the season. Now he may not have been ready to play those minutes right then but he should have gotten more and then taken over for Aundre 3-4 games before he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
1,820
1,391
42
If they sat Paul to rest him due to his injuries for a few games then Miller has to play to spell Derek and Cam. It's not just play Derek...lol. And therein lied the problem once Mag went down, there wasn't enough bench depth to be able to sit Paul or Caleb. Either of them playing was better than the alternative.

BTW Derek should have been playing over Hyatt not Paul. I said that from the minute Mag was lost for the season. Now he may not have been ready to play those minutes right then but he should have gotten more and then taken over for Aundre 3-4 games before he did.
Agreed Paul on the wing for Hyatt and DS at PG instead of Paul which I believe I said. It’s all over now . Pike pulled the wrong levers and came up empty. Learning experience for Pike. Shouldn’t be an issue this year.