I agree with some of this, and it is a reasonable take.
@MADHAT1 surprised me a bit with his post, but if I read his post correctly, we share a similar view. I vacillate between ranting over results and record of 2.0 and realizing that there is a risk in making a change, particularly at this juncture with such a large buyout. We have seen Maryland and Wisconsin take similar approaches, with both programs being in equally or worse situations than Rutgers in football. Wisconsin's is particularly perplexing, but cry me a Wisconsin river-it's good to see them fail and flail.
The approach around raising NIL will only pay dividends in the long run, if not in the short run. If Greg can't get it done with more NIL money (in addition to the revenue sharing portion of the $20.5M), then we will know that we gave him every opportunity to give it his best shot. If he succeeds, then Keli Zinn looks like a genius. If it he does not succeed, then we have an NIL infrastructure in place, which is sorely needed going forward, even though we have revenue sharing.
That think that Michigan State's decision on Jonathan Smith was too hasty. It took him a few years to build downtrodden Oregon State to a ten win season. Don't know what their expectations are-but as Wisconsin has learned since firing Paul Chryst-haste can make waste.