Uhhh, so that is a lie.No one is upset for him bringing a weapon.
Uhhh, so that is a lie.No one is upset for him bringing a weapon.
No one cares that he brought a gun with him. He as well within his rights, until he violated the terms of his license.Why you keep bringing up old ****?
Notice how these obviously hypocritical points are just not being addressed by the good MAGAs? They sort of just gloss over it.
Wait, wait, wait. Clarifying question: you talking about Mark McCloskey in the pic or Alex Pretti? Because if the former, then you are correct; if the latter then you are lying. That's sort of the point.No one is upset for him bringing a weapon.
So you're blind. I actually never considered that. Explains a lot.No one cares that he brought a gun with him. He as well within his rights, until he violated the terms of his license.
He got shot because he interfered with an investigation, assaulted ICE agents, and resisted arrest all while agitators were fueling the fire and confusing the situation. He didn't deserve to die for assaulting an officer and resisting arrest, but it greatly increased the chances of something going wrong of which it did.
His death was at his own hands and could have been totally avoided if this NARCISSIST didn't think he gets to tell ICE how to do their jobs.
I suppose I should say i think the majority of people don't care he brought a weapon. It is fairly irrelevant to the situation.Uhhh, so that is a lie.
According to science, it is not possible. And given the lies from this administration, we can’t take them at their word. But if it was true, they would continue to highlight it, which they aren’t.has anybody come across information on the "finger loss" by an agent in minneapolis?
Someone posted that they had seen that the finger loss was actually caused by the agent throwing a flash bang...
But so far, news stories still say the finger was bitten off by a protester.
Just trying to follow up.
McCloskey was well within his rights to defend his home.Wait, wait, wait. Clarifying question: you talking about Mark McCloskey in the pic or Alex Pretti? Because if the former, then you are correct; if the latter then you are lying. That's sort of the point.
He. Never. Pulled. His. Gun. Quit just saying stuffMcCloskey was well within his rights to defend his home.
Pretti was not within his rights to pull a gun because he doesn't like the way ICE is doing their job. This is first grade level stuff.
What am i blind about?So you're blind. I actually never considered that. Explains a lot.
Other than every official account I suppose.No one is upset for him bringing a weapon.
OK. To me it is beside the point.Other than every official account I suppose.
It is unbelievably disingenuous to watch that video and say he was assaulting anyone. Literally every single action by the agent in that video was excessive force. Pushing a lady down (excessive), point blank spraying her in the face with pepper spray (excessive), then spraying the other people there including the eventual victim (excessive), and finally having five agents tackle him to the ground and beat on him, including pistol whipping him, while the entire time he's got one hand on his phone, both of them and his forearms on the ground, before they disarm him of the weapon that never left his holster until they removed it, whereupon they then shot him three times in the back, and then 7 total more times while he lay prone on the ground.No one cares that he brought a gun with him. He as well within his rights, until he violated the terms of his license.
He got shot because he interfered with an investigation, assaulted ICE agents, and resisted arrest all while agitators were fueling the fire and confusing the situation. He didn't deserve to die for assaulting an officer and resisting arrest, but it greatly increased the chances of something going wrong of which it did.
His death was at his own hands and could have been totally avoided if this NARCISSIST didn't think he gets to tell ICE how to do their jobs.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH possibly pulling a gun. There is video of 100% of the interaction from different angles.I suppose I should say i think the majority of people don't care he brought a weapon. It is fairly irrelevant to the situation.
He should not have been interfereing with ICE. He had no right to interfere. He only had the right to peacefully protest. He broke the peace by shoving an officer in the line of work, possibly pulling a gun, and then resisted arrest and further interrupting ICE.
The gun is irrelevant to the point that you don't get to be violent because you don't like the way someone is doing their job. If you do, you risk something going very wrong, including death or incarceration.
How quickly things escalated from yesterday when he "struggled with officers for :13 seconds"I suppose I should say i think the majority of people don't care he brought a weapon. It is fairly irrelevant to the situation.
He should not have been interfereing with ICE. He had no right to interfere. He only had the right to peacefully protest. He broke the peace by shoving an officer in the line of work, possibly pulling a gun, and then resisted arrest and further interrupting ICE.
The gun is irrelevant to the point that you don't get to be violent because you don't like the way someone is doing their job. If you do, you risk something going very wrong, including death or incarceration.
He broke the peace by shoving an officer in the line of work, possibly pulling a gun, and then resisted arrest and further interrupting ICE.
Man, I could write a novella on this. But let's just keep it to the video that Pretti NEVER PULLED A GUN, that ICE actually assaulted and battered another citizen, a female, by throwing her down, that Pretti went to help her, and that he was subsequently assaulted and battered by multiple ICE agents. Let's start there because those are all factually accurate statements. Most important, though, is that Pretti NEVER PULLED A GUN.What am i blind about?
I agree, and therefore I question your education.McCloskey was well within his rights to defend his home.
Pretti was not within his rights to pull a gun because he doesn't like the way ICE is doing their job. This is first grade level stuff.
Let start with interfering. Do you agree he was interfering with ICE operations by blocking traffic?It is unbelievably disingenuous to watch that video and say he was assaulting anyone. Literally every single action by the agent in that video was excessive force. Pushing a lady down (excessive), point blank spraying her in the face with pepper spray (excessive), then spraying the other people there including the eventual victim (excessive), and finally having five agents tackle him to the ground and beat on him, including pistol whipping him, while the entire time he's got one hand on his phone, both of them and his forearms on the ground, before they disarm him of the weapon that never left his holster until they removed it, whereupon they then shot him three times in the back, and then 7 total more times while he lay prone on the ground.
You're full of **** and you know you are. He wasn't even aggressive in his stance, etc as he blocked the pepper spray. At no point did he even act like a threat to a single agent there. The "tussle" didn't even start until they started to push and pull on him as he is helping the lady up who was pushed down and pepper sprayed in the face.
Which assisted living facility did you send this from? LMK and I’ll DoorDash you some crossword puzzles and bird seedHey PoS…don’t drink and write. It makes you look ignorant and stupid.
There are sworn affidavits he was directing traffic. Then when approached by agents, after a short discussion he heads to the sidewalk where he helps the lady being pushed down by the agent. At no point in any video does it show him blocking traffic. So it sounds to me like you're starting from a point of something not shown on any video or on any account I've seen, rather than what our eyes can see. IF he was blocking the road, then by the time the conflict happened, he had stopped, yes?Let start with interfering. Do you agree he was interfering with ICE operations by blocking traffic?
Let's see what we can agree on and where we start to disagree. I can do it without name calling, i'll give you a fresh slate, see if you can do the same.
Here he is approximately :30 seconds before the shooting. He is standing in the middle of the street. His sole purpose for standing in the middle of the street is to disrupt ICE. There is no other reason for him to be standing in the middle of the street. He still has the opportunity to stay alive at this point. He can go stand on the other side of the street and let ICE do their job. We can agree that he has that opportunity at this point, correct?There are sworn affidavits he was directing traffic. Then when approached by agents, after a short discussion he heads to the sidewalk where he helps the lady being pushed down by the agent. At no point in any video does it show him blocking traffic. So it sounds to me like you're starting from a point of something not shown on any video or on any account I've seen, rather than what our eyes can see. IF he was blocking the road, then by the time the conflict happened, he had stopped, yes?

He is in the middle of the road to film what's happening further down while waving traffic through, then quickly retreats to the sidewalk. Not a reason to push him to the ground, spray him in the face with pepper spray and murder him with ten bullets, seven after he was no longer moving. But that's what happens when you send your lib-hating, para-military army with no training to overwhelm a blue city.Here he is approximately :30 seconds before the shooting. He is standing in the middle of the street. His sole purpose for standing in the middle of the street is to disrupt ICE. There is no other reason for him to be standing in the middle of the street. He still has the opportunity to stay alive at this point. He can go stand on the other side of the street and let ICE do their job. We can agree that he has that opportunity at this point, correct?
View attachment 1164723
Here he is a few seconds later. In the middle of traffic. Certainly not just standing there directing traffic. He is jaywalking down the middle of the street at a time ICE is trying to do enforcement work. This is interference. He still has the opportunity to go to the sidewalk and safely film.
View attachment 1164729
He has the opportunity to stay alive? Do you hear yourself right now? And it's amazing how similar directing traffic and blocking traffic are, yes? Particularly with a screenshot of a single moment in time?Here he is approximately :30 seconds before the shooting. He is standing in the middle of the street. His sole purpose for standing in the middle of the street is to disrupt ICE. There is no other reason for him to be standing in the middle of the street. He still has the opportunity to stay alive at this point. He can go stand on the other side of the street and let ICE do their job. We can agree that he has that opportunity at this point, correct?
View attachment 1164723
Here is an angle that shows him reaching for his gun is.You cant tell that and the gun did fire. In a life or death fight you only have a split second to react. Again its not a game. The stakes are life and death. Hesitate and you or one of the members of your team dies. Dont F around and try to cosplay some GTA fantasy you might have...

The directing traffic lie is corrected with video evidence. There is no evidence of him directing traffic. If so, please post a picture to back up your claims as i am doing.He has the opportunity to stay alive? Do you hear yourself right now? And it's amazing how similar directing traffic and blocking traffic are, yes? Particularly with a screenshot of a single moment in time?
Here is an angle that shows him reaching for his gun is.
Enjoy your state sanctioned murder I guess.critical moment when he decides to go from "legal observer" to interferer. At this point he sees ICE trying to detain or push back the other protester. At this point he could let ICE do their job OR he can interfere. While armed, and against the terms of his carry license in MN, he gets involved in the mix and further interferes with ICE.
View attachment 1164735
This was AFTER he had already been shot in the back three times and tried to get up. I can't believe he would resist being murdered. What was he thinking?

Sigh. This was AFTER he had been shot in the back three times and that's his cellphone.His right hand where he has his gun also so it appears to the agents he's reaching for it. Simply follow the lawful commands and this doesnt happen...