And they are a better team because their players are better - way better, and their roster is deeper. It would take a fool or someone who knows very little about college football to not agree on that. And that's the point that the above posters A school like Montini has markedly more gifted athlete than other public schools of the same size. Just like Ohio State has more gifted athlete than any MAC team. For the high schools i question, some of it is recruiting, but there are also loads of young grammar school kids throughout Dupage county that hope somehow, someway they can be part of what's going on over at a place like Montini. Once these programs are established, most of the talent flow in by itself. What are they going to say? Sorry, but we already have too many big guys to pay O-line. You'll have to Glenbard East and enjoy four loosing seasons.
@rfb321 I completely agree with you here. The game itself is fair, but the competitive ability between the two programs is not equal, which is why they generally don't compete against the same schools.
I'm not denying that Montini, SHG, Rochester and some schools have grown their program to a status that puts them above schools of the same enrollment size (whether public or multiplied private). What I am saying is that enrollment size has proven to be an inaccurate way to classify competitive equity between schools. Separating publics vs privates doesn't address that any better than a blanket multiplier to all private schools does.