I agree, but the one problem I have with it is that doing so would push someone down. For example if Montini requesting to 8A pushed Maine South or Glenbard West into 7A then whats the point? And I dont necessarily want to see 8A be essentially a Private class with the largest publics included, it seems haphazard.
The only way I could see it working is if the top class is 64 teams.
Rochester. I would look to see if they are playing by the rules before moving them up. If nothing comes up then no need to move them up a class.You think there aren't any?
I dont think enrollment is supposed to determine how good a team is, but it is a way to classify similar schools objectively. Key words being "similar schools" and "objectively"Or - if MS or GW also play up maybe it's a team like Curie or Huntley (not sure those are great examples, but I think you get my drift) that get a chance to compete for a title in 7A. I think we all know enrollment is not the best indicator of how good a team is.
Rochester. I would look to see if they are playing by the rules before moving them up. If nothing comes up then no need to move them up a class.
I dont think enrollment is supposed to determine how good a team is, but it is a way to classify similar schools objectively. Key words being "similar schools" and "objectively"
Thus, if the split were to occur, I don't know that enrollment is the best method to classify open boundaried schools, so people like @ramblinman would be able to come up with the best method to group them in a post season.
Wow... You really have the "oh poor me" hat on today. Let me set you straight. The publics LOATHE the fact that the privates (read Catholic) can recruit kids from their school districts. Like I said before, go to a Burros, or Falcons game and you'll see five different private school coaches there. Now I am sure that they are not there to enjoy a fall Saturday at Main Park....Regardless I think your point is not a strong one. The hatred and animosity within the public school community toward private (read: Catholic) schools is widespread...
It's the nature of the public school beast. They don't like losing to other public schools, but they LOATHE losing to private (read: Catholic) schools.
I'm torn as to what to do with boundaried schools that don't have boundaries... Phillips, I probably quadruple the enrollment and let them play in the closed boundary or let the closed boundary committee choose where they fit in.FWIW - Using the Success Adjustment definition (and this years results) - I think Philips, GW, Tolono Unity and C-M would be public schools that would also "qualify"... several other fall into the MC/Naz category where their success crosses classes - CG, Maroa, and Downs Tri-Valley.
You are correct - I definitely didn't explain it very well; my intent was that enrollment is not the best indication of classification. But I also think there can be an objective way to classify that takes into account enrollment, SoS, etc., that would be an overall better approach than what is currently in place - and at least reduce the private vs. public crap.
Name them
Wow... You really have the "oh poor me" hat on today. Let me set you straight. The publics LOATHE the fact that the privates (read Catholic) can recruit kids from their school districts. Like I said before, go to a Burros, or Falcons game and you'll see five different private school coaches there. Now I am sure that they are not there to enjoy a fall Saturday at Main Park....