If Shapen gets hurt - who would you play?

maroontide06

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2023
611
591
93
The good news is that we have 4 games to play with before we have to pull an Arceto Clark.
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
38,224
14,998
113
Whoever wins the #2 job. Most likely Luke.
I think it's Taylor because he is the most likely to be loyal if that's a word in todays college football world. And the main reason - I think he is better. The only thing Kromenhoek has over Taylor is some experience.
 
Last edited:

maroontide06

Well-known member
Dec 14, 2023
611
591
93
I think it's Taylor because he is the most likely to be loyal if that's a word in todays college football world. And the main reason - I think he is better. The only think Kromenhoek has over Taylor is some experience.
Do you think we can get 8 games out of Shapen or is that going to be a long stretch?
 

BoDawg.sixpack

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2010
4,893
2,150
113
Taylor, we need someone who can pick up yards by scrambling with this matador offensive line.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
I think it's Taylor because he is the most likely to be loyal if that's a word in todays college football world. And the main reason - I think he is better. The only thing Kromenhoek has over Taylor is some experience.
If he's better this fall, absolutely play him. I really doubt that though. I get that everyone wants Taylor to be the next Dak, but the fact is Luke was higher rated coming out of high school than Taylor was plus he has a year of experience in a P4 conference. I suspect he's the better player today, and this fall. And the loyalty argument is meaningless. If Taylor is as good as y'all say he is, he'll be gone in a year or two.
 

aTotal360

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2009
20,482
11,291
113
I think it's Taylor because he is the most likely to be loyal if that's a word in todays college football world. And the main reason - I think he is better. The only thing Kromenhoek has over Taylor is some experience.
Still boggles my mind we paid the money to LK. Seemed like we just wanted a recruiting win. I get the value in having a quality backup. Especially when your starter has an injury history. But paying a kid to hold a clipboard and then leave seems suboptimal. Hopefully I'm wrong and he's the next mayor of Starkville.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
Still boggles my mind we paid the money to LK. Seemed like we just wanted a recruiting win. I get the value in having a quality backup. Especially when your starter has an injury history. But paying a kid to hold a clipboard and then leave seems suboptimal. Hopefully I'm wrong and he's the next mayor of Starkville.
I think we paid him because we expect he will play, either this year or next year. And I expect he will. I'm no Lebby fan, but he's not that stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

22yardpunt

Active member
Dec 20, 2009
804
359
63
KaMario Taylor or Luke Kromenhoek

Honest question - is Shapen really going to be the starter? It was my impression they Kromenhoek was going the dude, why we paid him the money. Otherwise why did we do that when we need o-lineman?
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
Honest question - is Shapen really going to be the starter? It was my impression they Kromenhoek was going the dude, why we paid him the money. Otherwise why did we do that when we need o-lineman?
I will be shocked is Shapen doesn't take every snap until (unless) he gets hurt.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: 22yardpunt

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
13,958
8,213
113
plus he has a year of experience in a P4 conference.
Pat it's a stretch to say he has a years experience, he started the last 2 games against Charleston Southern and Flarda. Otherwise he had mop up duty in 4 other games and in 3 of those he was less than 50% in completions, and was only 5-8 in the one he was over 50%. He threw 3 TD passes all of last season, all against lowly 1-11 Charleston Southern and had 2 interceptions elsewhere. He had 113 yds rushing last season, 78 of those were on just 3 rushes. His upside seems to be high but I think he has a long way to go
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
Pat it's a stretch to say he has a years experience, he started the last 2 games against Charleston Southern and Flarda. Otherwise he had mop up duty in 4 other games and in 3 of those he was less than 50% in completions, and was only 5-8 in the one he was over 50%. He threw 3 TD passes all of last season, all against lowly 1-11 Charleston Southern and had 2 interceptions elsewhere. He had 113 yds rushing last season, 78 of those were on just 3 rushes. His upside seems to be high but I think he has a long way to go
He's got a year in the program and saw significant action vs. Florida, Notre Dame and Miami. Yes his stats weren't good, but his team was awful. In any case, his experience is not even comparable to Taylor's. It's going to take something special from Taylor to beat him out. And maybe he will. But I really don't think Lebby signs him if he thinks Taylor is going to be ready to play this fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Howiefeltersnstch

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2019
1,860
2,356
98
I would play Luke and save the redshirt. At least up to the point when I decided Taylor might be better. I watched a couple of those FSU games and he did not look very good but freshman on a crappy team etc etc. I'm sure that experience helped him prepare for this year. Second year jump is usually a thing. And he can scramble and get yards too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Maroon13

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
2,777
2,759
113
I would play the better of the two. Which will be proven in practice and game reps.

However the "lockerroom" will demand Taylor and so will the few local alumni.
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2019
3,396
3,128
108
Still boggles my mind we paid the money to LK. Seemed like we just wanted a recruiting win. I get the value in having a quality backup. Especially when your starter has an injury history. But paying a kid to hold a clipboard and then leave seems suboptimal. Hopefully I'm wrong and he's the next mayor of Starkville.
That’s exactly what it was. Lost VB cause we thought we had Arnold, then scrambled around and overpaid for LK. None of it made sense.
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
10,578
5,707
113
Still boggles my mind we paid the money to LK. Seemed like we just wanted a recruiting win. I get the value in having a quality backup. Especially when your starter has an injury history. But paying a kid to hold a clipboard and then leave seems suboptimal. Hopefully I'm wrong and he's the next mayor of Starkville.
Yep, if the answer isn’t Luke, that is a serious indictment on Lebby’s ability to evaluate and disperse NIL funds. That kid didn’t come for free, and you can’t pay for that type of talent for them to be 3rd string on a bad team
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
10,578
5,707
113
Yes his stats weren't good, but his team was awful.
I’m afraid that Barrett’s got some bad news for the poor kid

im so very sad wade barrett GIF
 

aTotal360

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2009
20,482
11,291
113
I think we paid him because we expect he will play, either this year or next year. And I expect he will. I'm no Lebby fan, but he's not that stupid.
We "had" to overpay, unfortunately. I would have taken a chance and bought a OT or DT. I don't expect him to be any more loyal to us than he was to FSU.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
We "had" to overpay, unfortunately. I would have taken a chance and bought a OT or DT. I don't expect him to be any more loyal to us than he was to FSU.
Let's just go ahead and not expect ANY player to be loyal. Because they won't. I don't know if we overpaid for him or not, but I suspect we paid what we thought was a smart amount to pay for a #2 QB who has a good chance to start for the last half of the season and probably all of the next season or two. I would have loved to have taken a few good OT and DT. And I'm sure Lebby would have too. But we completely failed on that front.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,823
19,786
113
You play the player that gives you the best chance to win that game, period.
If it’s Luke, play him. You coach to win the 17ing game!
Exactly. I don’t know why that’s so hard for so many to understand. In the words of former Redskins coach George Allen, the future is now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hot Rock

Maroon13

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
2,777
2,759
113
I couldn't care less that Mvb left. He was undersized. However, I don't get signing LK when you know you have KT.

I like LK. I hope he is awesome. I don't think he will get a fair shot at QB1 though.
 
Last edited:

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,276
3,400
108
Taylor, we need someone who can pick up yards by scrambling with this matador offensive line.
And you know this how about our OL?
We added the starting guard from Stanford, the projected starting guard and tackles from both Colorado and Maryland , the starting RT tackle from UVA and one of the top centers in the portal from UTEP
Let’s pump the brakes that our OL will be bad
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripp McNeely

Bulldawg77

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2019
2,276
3,400
108
I couldn't care less that Mvb left. He was undersized. However, I don't get signing LK when you know you have KT.

I like LK. I hope he is awesome. I don't think he will get a fair shot at QB1 though.
You don’t want to go into a season with two QBs with one being a Sr and the other being a true freshman. LK is a tremendous talent as is Taylor but no way you would ever just carry two QBs. Next spring you will two elite QBs battling for the starting job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripp McNeely