LOCKED - Looks like the universities are all supporting Cochran...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 16, 2005
27,639
20,676
113
If I remember right, the reason they went beyond the 100 days is because it was an election year anyway (Presidential and Cochran on the ballot) so they granted time to put it all on the same ballot.
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,932
2,594
113
So socialists are racist too?

You don't see how the govt basically owning private industry, like healthcare where people are forced to buy a product and the govt dictates what the govt will pay to those private industries, basically means the govt controls that industry and technically owns it? And the redistribution of wealth is a perfect example communism. But I'm sure that doesn't bother you either. And the way the govt is attempting to take over thru regulations and control everything in our lives? Doesn't bother you? Aw hell. Nevermind. I'm just a stupid, racist so you can't talk sense to me.

I never called you stupid or racist, nor did I ever blame you personally for all the names conservatives regularly call liberals on this board and off it, so quit whining to me.

Again, just because the U.S. health care system has some consumer protection laws doesn't make it socialist. Unless you are over 65, poor (extremely poor in some states, below 133% FPL in others), or a veteran, you must buy your own health insurance (no one is forced to, although they must pay an extra 1% tax if they don't) on the private market AND seek treatment in a private facility. The vast majority of doctors offices and insurance companies are NOT owned by the government and are NOT owned collectively by workers who stood up and seized them from the owners. Therefore, not socialist. Yes there are regulations, but regulations are not the same thing as socialism, which is the collective ownership of industry by workers.
 
Last edited:

was21

Senior
May 29, 2007
9,938
584
113
yes, and since they are, he probably won't win. If McDaniels wins, he will be voted in by the ignoramus crowd in the state, and they are the majority, unfortunately.
 

UIUCDog

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
711
0
0
Oops, looks like the Rush Limbaugh talking points just ran into actual facts. Listen again tomorrow and try your luck again, dittohead.
 
Aug 18, 2009
1,107
40
48
Unfortunately, it is a fact that the ignorant can rule. If Cochran loses it will only further demonstrate to everyone in the country that our state (I wanted to use "great state" but it's hard when we do dumb things) is incapable of doing anything right, even when it's the most beneficial course for itself. Others have said it correctly, that Senator Cochran should have retired so a legit candidate could have opposed the batshit crazy that we are now in danger of accidentally electing, but it didn't happen that way. At this point Thad is still 1000> than the alternative. Anyone that doesn't understand that is simply incapable of looking at dollar figures and understanding how the world works. Tell me that "pork" is bad, and I will agree. But if everyone else says yes to pork and you say no, then guess what!? Everyone else gets money and you lose jobs, which the tea party will then try to blame on someone else even though they ****** us proper themselves.
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,870
6,569
113
If I were a tax payer from another state and observed the people of Mississippi sending a big spending 42 year veteran bureaucrat who appears to be in some stage of senility home even though it may cause their state to have to make some sacrifices......quite frankly I`d tip my cap. Bottom line is it didn`t have to happen this way. This is the direct fault of the greedy republican "establishment" in Mississippi for not listening to a what used to be a large part of their core constituency.
 

Bully13

Redshirt
Feb 10, 2013
180
0
0
Government "entitlement" spending is not a synonym for Socialism -- "socialism" is an economic system in which the workers own the means of production rather than an owning class. Stalin's farm collectivizations in the 1930s are a good example. A factory whose workers completely threw out all of the owners and ran the factory themselves would be an example. A more benign example would be Britain's health care system, which is socialistic because the government doesn't just pay for medical services, it owns all the hospitals and doctors offices too. (By contrast, Canada's health care system isn't very socialistic because the government pays for the services, but medical care is still performed by private, market-oriented doctors. The American system is even less socialistic than Canada's because the government only covers the olds and the very poor, although you could make an argument for veteran health care being very socialistic because of the VA hospitals, but I doubt that's the angle you were going for.)

Anyhow, Obama has done nothing approaching actual socialism -- never advocated for mass collectivization or anything like that. Don't you think there's a reason why all actual American socialists hate Obama?

you don't come in and do an automatic socialist change with a country like the U.S. that built its greatness on free market capitalism and individual responsibility. you have to do it gradually. like when he told his union audience before he got elected that his primary goal is single payer health care but Obama care would be the first step. reminding them to be patient. like when he re-wrote bankruptcy law in the Chrysler case screwing over the secured creditors in favor of the union. like when he said of business owners "you didn't build that". it's his mindset. nobody who claims his mentors being frank marshall davis, reverend wright and sal alinsky can be considered a fan of what made America # 1. but you have to do it gradually. kinda of like putting a frog in tepid water and turning the eye on medium low. he'll just sit there and gradually burn to death not realizing what's happening..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.