That would be a dick move on our part if that's true. If we do that I hope it isn't just to one up MSU.
question for the bear lurkers......what is the capacity of the current NORTH endzone that has the temporary bleachers? i ask because it is a pretty large section and if you bowl it off like this. You wont be adding many seats at all because the current bleachers are pretty large as far as temporary seating goes. in the pic above, you would just be adding seating enough to close up the open areas, which isnt that large of a space. as you already know, because of the of location of those newly built academic support buildings, you would not be able to advance the stadium taller without the removal of a building or two. for the endzones to be symmetrical, you would be required to demolish newly built buildings. anywho, im curious what the current capacity is on the north endzone because it looks far more substantial than the one we had.
Including suites and the dark grey seats below and you get to 10k? Hell, I think our East side upper deck only holds 7k.
![]()
Then
Nothing official has been announced on any specific plans. That was my point... Red57 was claiming they were going to add 10,000 seats and nothing official has been announced besides saying there are future plans to renovate.
Yes the bathrooms are a joke but I remember going to MSU's stadium in 2003, 2005, and 2009 only to find dirt-covered mud floors underneath the stadium on the ground level along with what looked like cobweb filled rotting concrete columns. Now, granted, those issues have now been fixed. I hope.That stadium is a dump. I was there two years ago when we played them. The sound system is terrible, the bathrooms were a joke, the concession stands were undermanned and the hallways and corridors smelled like puke.
It's another example of Ole Miss people thinking that their facilities are superior to everyone else's, mainly because they haven't been anywhere else-- low exposure. They are delusional people. The borders of their map end at Oxford to the north and Destin to the South.
They brag about that indoor practice facility that can't hold a candle to our football facilities. The only difference between the Grove and the Junction is a few more trees.
Yes the bathrooms are a joke but I remember going to MSU's stadium in 2003, 2005, and 2009 only to find dirt-covered mud floors underneath the stadium on the ground level along with what looked like cobweb filled rotting concrete columns. Now, granted, those issues have now been fixed. I hope.
That's harsh, dotcomdawg. OUR STADIUM IS MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING THAN YOUR STADIUM!
/Bear-controlled media
Big shout-out to some guy named Steven Godfrey for voting us third, although to be fair, only 1 of the 12 experts said yours is prettier than ours (the Aggie guy, go figure). I think y'all have a good shot at closing the gap some with all the renovations though, so keep your heads up.
This is the real 87, no nephew today and if you were at the egg bowl those years on the West side of the stadium in sections 6 and 7 then you definitely couldn't miss it because it was raining and there was mud and dirt all over the place on the lower level. And yes our stadium is more obsolete then your's after the upgrades. Your stadium looks great and is very modern. Ours isn't anymore. And FYI concrete actually does rot.http://www.dundee-memorialpark.org/ohm/index.php?cat=Concrete&art=Damage Prevention.txtTell your uncle we said hello.
Dirt-covered mud floors? Sounds like a safety issue. Glad I never found those.
And rotting concrete? Maybe someone should make a building material that doesn't rot... Oh wait, that's what concrete is.
Can we just stop poking at one another about the stadiums? They're both bad. Glad most of the issues with ours have been taken care of recently.
I would go a bit further and say that ANY school significantly adding capacity is borderline stupid. The attendance bubble has peaked and is heading downwards. In 10 years, we're going to be seeing a LOT of empty seats in every football stadium.
That's harsh, dotcomdawg. OUR STADIUM IS MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING THAN YOUR STADIUM!
/Bear-controlled media
Big shout-out to some guy named Steven Godfrey for voting us third, although to be fair, only 1 of the 12 experts said yours is prettier than ours (the Aggie guy, go figure). I think y'all have a good shot at closing the gap some with all the renovations though, so keep your heads up.
Really not sure why you'd bother with bowling in the north end zone at all if you're not going to add any premium seats other than to top us in capacity.
Have you any rankings from unbiased stadium experts placing DWS ahead of VHS?
Have you any rankings from unbiased stadium experts placing DWS ahead of VHS?
Does VHS have grass yet?
I find it hard to believe a fine publication like Athlon's would call them "experts" in the absence of compelling qualifications and intimate familiarity with all 14 stadiums. No, it sounds like you're just unhappy with the way the vote turned out, so now you want to attack the voters and the process. So sad, these days everyone wants to challenge unbiased election results with crazy allegations of voter fraud and conspiracies and such.
Does VHS have grass yet?