LOVE THE COMING DEMOCRATIC SHUMER GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
Why? Furloughed workers aren't allowed to work and they had nothing to do with the shut down. Why should they be denied back pay?
I understand that they didn't choose to be furloughed but that's also true in the private sector. If a company is struggling and has a 3 week layoff the employees aren't paid.

I just don't see the sense in paying people who aren't working. I also don't see why they should be treated the same as people who worked through the shutdown.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
I understand that they didn't choose to be furloughed but that's also true in the private sector. If a company is struggling and has a 3 week layoff the employees aren't paid.

I just don't see the sense in paying people who aren't working. I also don't see why they should be treated the same as people who worked through the shutdown.
It's illegal not to pay them and even worse, Trump has implied that it may only apply to the ones who didn't vote for him.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
I understand that they didn't choose to be furloughed but that's also true in the private sector. If a company is struggling and has a 3 week layoff the employees aren't paid.

I just don't see the sense in paying people who aren't working. I also don't see why they should be treated the same as people who worked through the shutdown.
if you accept that shutdowns are mostly, if not always, political, it is my position that the more political pressure applied yields the fastest conclusion. Right now, the idea of paying federal employees back pay removes a key variable of political pressure. Remove that back pay and shutdown decisions become more costly politically for both parties.

Same applies for the people who make the decision to shutdown. Members of Congress should not be paid for the shutdown period.

We make these shutdowns too easy. Not enough people feel sufficient pain
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
You're making stuff up again.
I never make things up. Ever

You tell me what the implication is here:

"Trump, when asked at the White House on Tuesday afternoon about back pay for those workers, said, “I would say it depends on who we’re talking about.”

The Democrats — whom Trump and Republicans blame for the shutdown that is now on Day 7 — “have put a lot of people in great risk and jeopardy,”
the president said in the Oval Office alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

But it really depends on who you’re talking about,” he said. “For the most part, we’re going to take care of our people.

Trump added, “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”

When asked why he said some workers should not get their back pay, he said, “Ask the Democrats that question.”

 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
10,058
10,717
113
if you accept that shutdowns are mostly, if not always, political, it is my position that the more political pressure applied yields the fastest conclusion. Right now, the idea of paying federal employees back pay removes a key variable of political pressure. Remove that back pay and shutdown decisions become more costly politically for both parties.

Same applies for the people who make the decision to shutdown. Members of Congress should not be paid for the shutdown period.

We make these shutdowns too easy. Not enough people feel sufficient pain
"Same applies for the people who make the decision to shutdown. Members of Congress should not be paid for the shutdown period.

We make these shutdowns too easy. Not enough people feel sufficient pain"

AMEN. The people who make these decisions suffer NO consequences.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
I never make things up. Ever

"Trump, when asked at the White House on Tuesday afternoon about back pay for those workers, said, “I would say it depends on who we’re talking about.”
You're absolutely making things up. You changed "It depends on who we're taking about" into "people who didn't vote for him".

First of all he doesn't know who voted for him. Second you're suggesting that he won't pay democrats who are working in air traffic control or serving in the military.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
You're absolutely making things up. You changed "It depends on who we're taking about" into "people who didn't vote for him".

First of all he doesn't know who voted for him. Second you're suggesting that he won't pay democrats who are working in air traffic control or serving in the military.
Re-read what I said.
It's illegal not to pay them and even worse, Trump has implied that it may only apply to the ones who didn't vote for him.

Then re-read his whole statement that confirms the implication. It doesn't matter that he doesn't know who voted for him, it's the implication that Democrats don't deserve backpay. If not, you tell me who he's talking about when he says “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
Re-read what I said.


Then re-read his whole statement that confirms the implication. It doesn't matter that he doesn't know who voted for him, it's the implication that Democrats don't deserve backpay. If not, you tell me who he's talking about when he says “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”
I read and reread what you posted. You're making stuff up.

You remind me of some people on another message board that claimed no tax on tips was a giveaway to billionaires who would take their pay in tips. I don't even like that policy but saying such things is nuckenfutz.

And btw I didn't opine on what was legal vs illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
I read and reread what you posted. You're making stuff up.

You remind me of some people on another message board that claimed no tax on tips was a giveaway to billionaires who would take their pay in tips. I don't even like that policy but saying such things is nuckenfutz.

And btw I didn't opine on what was legal vs illegal.
Just answer the question - who could he be talking about when he says "some people that really don't deserve to be taken care of?" Besides the fact that it's a sadistic comment, who among the involuntarily furloughed, in particular, wouldn't deserve it?
 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
10,058
10,717
113
You're absolutely making things up. You changed "It depends on who we're taking about" into "people who didn't vote for him".

First of all he doesn't know who voted for him. Second you're suggesting that he won't pay democrats who are working in air traffic control or serving in the military.
"serving in the military." He/she/the/them/they absolutely makes things up. IT has no idea how things work. I made that idiot a promise I would never respond to IT again.

This may change, so I am not saying you are wrong, but after this week, I won't get paid. This applies to Dem/Rep.

The gov't owes me money for things I have already produced, and pay for days that I have already worked, but I will not get paid until a resolution of this "shutdown" is over.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
"serving in the military." He/she/the/them/they absolutely makes things up. IT has no idea how things work. I made that idiot a promise I would never respond to IT again.

This may change, so I am not saying you are wrong, but after this week, I won't get paid. This applies to Dem/Rep.

The gov't owes me money for things I have already produced, and pay for days that I have already worked, but I will not get paid until a resolution of this "shutdown" is over.
Tell the truth Hambone - you blocked me because I blew up your stupid, hateful, countrified *** so many times, you couldn't take it anymore, so you ran and hid. You aren't fooling anyone.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
Just answer the question - who could he be talking about when he says "some people that really don't deserve to be taken care of?" Besides the fact that it's a sadistic comment, who among the involuntarily furloughed, in particular, wouldn't deserve it?
Trump is bombastic and he makes a lot of unfiltered comments. In this case I think he's referring to positions / agencies that he doesn't think provide sufficient value. I don't think there's ANY chance that he'd select individual people based on how they voted. Like I asked, do you really think he would pay republican military but not democrat military? ZERO CHANCE of that happening.

I expect him to pay everybody because the law will force him to do so unless he can find a loophole.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
"serving in the military." He/she/the/them/they absolutely makes things up. IT has no idea how things work. I made that idiot a promise I would never respond to IT again.

This may change, so I am not saying you are wrong, but after this week, I won't get paid. This applies to Dem/Rep.

The gov't owes me money for things I have already produced, and pay for days that I have already worked, but I will not get paid until a resolution of this "shutdown" is over.
Are you active military working through the shutdown?

I have a friend whose son is in the military and will struggle to make his housing payment. My friend intends to loan him the money until he eventually gets paid.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Allornothing

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
6,880
14,292
113
Trump is bombastic and he makes a lot of unfiltered comments. In this case I think he's referring to positions / agencies that he doesn't think provide sufficient value. I don't think there's ANY chance that he'd select individual people based on how they voted. Like I asked, do you really think he would pay republican military but not democrat military? ZERO CHANCE of that happening.

I expect him to pay everybody because the law will force him to do so unless he can find a loophole.
Just pointing out that he was reading an implication one way, and you were reading what he means another way. He is not giving him any benefit of the doubt, you are giving him the benefit of the doubt. One can argue whether one position is using the available evidence to interpret better, etc, but what that evidence is would also be disputed.

All that to say, he isn't making anything up, he's just interpreting the statement differently.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
Trump is bombastic and he makes a lot of unfiltered comments. In this case I think he's referring to positions / agencies that he doesn't think provide sufficient value. I don't think there's ANY chance that he'd select individual people based on how they voted. Like I asked, do you really think he would pay republican military but not democrat military? ZERO CHANCE of that happening.

I expect him to pay everybody because the law will force him to do so unless he can find a loophole.
He didn't specify who he was talking about and I doubt he meant all Democrats even if they serve in the military, that's you filling in the blank. But he very well could mean an agency that he considers left-leaning but who knows with that sadistic imbecile.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
He didn't specify who he was talking about and I doubt he meant all Democrats even if they serve in the military, that's you filling in the blank. But he very well could mean an agency that he considers left-leaning but who knows with that sadistic imbecile.
Republicans favor certain government agencies and democrats favor others. That's no secret. Biden forgave student loans and republicans didn't like it.

The bottom line to me is that we're $37 trillion in debt with annual deficits of $2.2 trillion and growing. Unfunded liabilities are through the roof. We've added so many federal spending programs that spending is growing twice as fast as inflation. Something's got to give. What's the solution? Even more government spending programs? Paying federal employees who aren't even working?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
6,880
14,292
113
Republicans favor certain government agencies and democrats favor others. That's no secret. Biden forgave student loans and republicans didn't like it.

The bottom line to me is that we're $37 trillion in debt with annual deficits of $2.2 trillion and growing. Unfunded liabilities are through the roof. We've added so many federal spending programs that spending is growing twice as fast as inflation. Something's got to give. What's the solution? Even more government spending programs? Paying federal employees who aren't even working?
A lot of Dem’s didn’t like it as well. Including on this board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
Republicans favor certain government agencies and democrats favor others. That's no secret. Biden forgave student loans and republicans didn't like it.

The bottom line to me is that we're $37 trillion in debt with annual deficits of $2.2 trillion and growing. Unfunded liabilities are through the roof. We've added so many federal spending programs that spending is growing twice as fast as inflation. Something's got to give. What's the solution? Even more government spending programs? Paying federal employees who aren't even working?
Now you're changing the subject again but treating government workers like they're villains is disgusting and it's taking a real toll on their mental health. I know it's in fashion now but it's a horrible way to treat these people who choose to serve their country. There are no Democratic or Republican agencies, just American ones and that's the way they've always been seen until this obnoxious regime took office.

‘We’re just beaten’: For beleaguered federal workers, shutdown is last straw​

Staffers are working without pay or on furlough — all after months of job cuts, and as the president vows to slash more agencies.


If Republicans really cared about the debt they would have allowed the tax cuts to expire or at the very least, taken a smaller cut.
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
Now you're changing the subject again but treating government workers like they're villains is disgusting and it's taking a real toll on their mental health. I know it's in fashion now but it's a horrible way to treat these people who choose to serve their country. There are no Democratic or Republican agencies, just American ones and that's the way they've always been seen until this obnoxious regime took office.

‘We’re just beaten’: For beleaguered federal workers, shutdown is last straw​

Staffers are working without pay or on furlough — all after months of job cuts, and as the president vows to slash more agencies.


If Republicans really cared about the debt they would have allowed the tax cuts to expire or at the very least, taken a smaller cut.
  1. I never called government workers villains. I simply said that if you work you should get paid and if you get laid off you shouldn't get paid.
  2. Democrats would have NEVER allowed the Trump tax cuts to expire. They would have renewed every last one of them (rate cuts, standard deduction, child credit, etc) except for the top rate which would go from 37% to 39.6%.
  3. I strongly opposed Trump's additional tax cuts (Tips, OT, SS). They're nice for those who get them but we can't afford it.
Guess what? If a private sector employee gets laid off temporarily they don't get paid. Why should government employees be treated differently?
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
  1. I never called government workers villains. I simply said that if you work you should get paid and if you get laid off you shouldn't get paid.
  2. Democrats would have NEVER allowed the Trump tax cuts to expire. They would have renewed every last one of them (rate cuts, standard deduction, child credit, etc) except for the top rate which would go from 37% to 39.6%.
  3. I strongly opposed Trump's additional tax cuts (Tips, OT, SS). They're nice for those who get them but we can't afford it.
Guess what? If a private sector employee gets laid off temporarily they don't get paid. Why should government employees be treated differently?

But it really depends on who you’re talking about,” he said. “For the most part, we’re going to take care of our people.

Trump added, “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”

1759951799338.png
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
  1. I never called government workers villains. I simply said that if you work you should get paid and if you get laid off you shouldn't get paid.
  2. Democrats would have NEVER allowed the Trump tax cuts to expire. They would have renewed every last one of them (rate cuts, standard deduction, child credit, etc) except for the top rate which would go from 37% to 39.6%.
  3. I strongly opposed Trump's additional tax cuts (Tips, OT, SS). They're nice for those who get them but we can't afford it.
Guess what? If a private sector employee gets laid off temporarily they don't get paid. Why should government employees be treated differently?
According to reports IRS just furloughed about 34000 employees. These won't get paid either during period of furlough, again according to reports
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
But it really depends on who you’re talking about,” he said. “For the most part, we’re going to take care of our people.

Trump added, “There are some people that really don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way.”

View attachment 945949
Yes and as I told you Trump speaks without a filter. But nowhere did he say that he was going to fire people who didn't vote for him. that's just you making stuff up.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
Yes and as I told you Trump speaks without a filter. But nowhere did he say that he was going to fire people who didn't vote for him. that's just you making stuff up.
I twice said "implied" Now you're being obtuse

1759952895571.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
According to reports IRS just furloughed about 34000 employees. These won't get paid either during period of furlough, again according to reports
I don't like that at all. Of course none of this would even be necessary if democrats would sign the short term funding bill. I'm old enough to remember democrats complain when republicans did the same thing.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
I don't like that at all. Of course none of this would even be necessary if democrats would sign the short term funding bill. I'm old enough to remember democrats complain when republicans did the same thing.
it's all a game. Everybody knows that the ACA subsidies will be extended. Maybe not permanently but at least from some period, According to reports even some House democrats are now proposing a one year extension with future negotiations over long term amounts. Republicans just upped the ante with these furloughs. We'll see what democrats do to strengthen their position while taxpayers/voters become the losers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bdgan

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,090
20,688
113
it's all a game. Everybody knows that the ACA subsidies will be extended. Maybe not permanently but at least from some period, According to reports even some House democrats are now proposing a one year extension with future negotiations over long term amounts. Republicans just upped the ante with these furloughs. We'll see what democrats do to strengthen their position while taxpayers/voters become the losers.

And somehow you are blaming the Democrats.... You do realize who controls all levels of the Federal Government right?
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
And somehow you are blaming the Democrats.... You do realize who controls all levels of the Federal Government right?
I come back to may basic question..How many republicans voted for the CR? How many democrats voted for the CR?

If all the Republicans voted Yes and all the Democrats voted no, which party voted against the CR?

I understand your position. But in DC, everything comes down to votes. Democrats voted against the CR. There's no way around that.
 

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,090
20,688
113
I come back to may basic question..How many republicans voted for the CR? How many democrats voted for the CR?

If all the Republicans voted Yes and all the Democrats voted no, which party voted against the CR?

I understand your position. But in DC, everything comes down to votes. Democrats voted against the CR. There's no way around that.

And your president said when the government shuts down it's the fault of the president....
 

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,268
3,277
113
And somehow you are blaming the Democrats.... You do realize who controls all levels of the Federal Government right?
The government is out of spending authority. Republicans passed a short term extension bill that requires 60 votes in the senate but only 3 democrats voted for it. It seems clear that democrats are the ones shutting the government down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PalmettoTiger1

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
I come back to may basic question..How many republicans voted for the CR? How many democrats voted for the CR?

If all the Republicans voted Yes and all the Democrats voted no, which party voted against the CR?

I understand your position. But in DC, everything comes down to votes. Democrats voted against the CR. There's no way around that.
Republicans could still reopen the government if they wanted to by using the nuclear option, just like they did a couple weeks ago. They've proven they don't care about bi-partisanship so why not use it?

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
Republicans could still reopen the government if they wanted to by using the nuclear option, just like they did a couple weeks ago. They've proven they don't care about bi-partisanship so why not use it?

so now Marjorie Taylor Greene is a saint to those on the left. Seems like just yesterday she was the reincarnation of the devil. Boy, how times have changed.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
so now Marjorie Taylor Greene is a saint to those on the left. Seems like just yesterday she was the reincarnation of the devil. Boy, how times have changed.
Ignore who said it and focus on the fact that a member of the majority party agrees they could reopen the government if they wanted to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
24,337
18,413
113
What's wild is that as crazy as she is... She sees the dishonesty and lying from her side and seems willing to admit it.

She also probably realizes she's gonna get killed in a reelection once Trump is gone.
If you've paid attention, she's voiced several differences she has with her party lately and recently said Republicans don't respect women. Plus, she's been in a nasty, bitter twitter fight with Trump's favorite attack dog Laura Loomer lol. I think she's starting to forge a new path that finds her aligning more and more with democrats. It's wild I tell ya lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,008
1,617
113
What's wild is that as crazy as she is... She sees the dishonesty and lying from her side and seems willing to admit it.

She also probably realizes she's gonna get killed in a reelection once Trump is gone.
yoshi, I love how your mind works...she's crazy but this time she's not. Maybe this time she's crazy and all the other times she wasn't Not likely though, normally she's even a little too far out for me
 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
10,058
10,717
113
"And somehow you are blaming the Democrats.... You do realize who controls all levels of the Federal Government right?"

Once again you prove your stupidity, and why you have to have to work the appointment desk at your wife's place of business instead of getting a job on your own merit/skills. I'm sure you make great pay though since it is a tax write-off for the business.

Republicans don't hold 60 seats in the Senate so they can not break a filibuster. If they did, there would have never been a gov't shutdown. All this amounts to is Chuck-you Schumer trying to do a typical demonrat shakedown and extort money from the American taxpayers ala Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
39,032
29,208
113
What's wild is that as crazy as she is... She sees the dishonesty and lying from her side and seems willing to admit it.

She also probably realizes she's gonna get killed in a reelection once Trump is gone.
Disagree. She will hold her district as long as she wants it.