What's wrong with what she said?This is the reason why she lost. She's a f'ing disgrace.
What's wrong with what she said?This is the reason why she lost. She's a f'ing disgrace.
What's wrong with what she said?
More "genius" from you, Hermy. From today's Washington Post:
One month into the shutdown, 45 percent of surveyed Americans ascribe the blame for it to Republican lawmakers and President Trump, according to a new Washington Post/ABC poll released Thursday. Democrats received 33 percent of the blame, while 22 percent of survey respondents said they were not sure.
Is that what she said? Because of?LOL... Are babies really going to starve because of a White House renovation?
Why would the republicans fold here? The dems basically are asking to roll back a large part of the changes implemented in the BBB.My main point is that Republicans are also choosing not to negotiate and demand they get their way (by way of clean CR, I get that). They could come to the table and discuss things, but are demanding a CR. They have the option of folding and say yes to everything the Dem’s are asking for, right? There are two sides to this, and the truth is it is 60 votes for a reason.
no, I understand all that. The Democrats feel as if they have leverage over republicans . Their "demand" adds $1.5 trillion to the deficit/debt and includes provisions they know the Republicans will not accept. Yes. both sides are playing the game. but, at this point, IMO, where we have people not getting paid, no food stamps, airports starting to slow down flights, etc, breaking out one segment for funding doesn't make sense. Remember democrats talk about saving healthcare but the ACA subsidies (about $350 Billion over 10 years) is only about 20% of what's in the Democrats demand.My main point is that Republicans are also choosing not to negotiate and demand they get their way (by way of clean CR, I get that). They could come to the table and discuss things, but are demanding a CR. They have the option of folding and say yes to everything the Dem’s are asking for, right? There are two sides to this, and the truth is it is 60 votes for a reason.
So how can that be biased? Republicans passed the CR in the House. 52 republicans have voted "yes" in the Senate. About 44 democrats have voted "no" on passing the CR, about the same amount voted "no" on breaking out pay for the military. Now you're going to tell me that republicans should negotiate. I understand the democrat talking point. But if what you're saying is that my position is biased because of my statement above, is your's any less biased because you blame republicans?I would have expected no less from you on this issue. Thanks for your unbiased perspective.![]()
The leader of the democratic party folks. She is such an embarrassment.
and yet the Washington post called for DEMOCRATS to end the shutdown. This far right newspaper knows where the blame lies, even if you don't.More "genius" from you, Hermy. From today's Washington Post:
One month into the shutdown, 45 percent of surveyed Americans ascribe the blame for it to Republican lawmakers and President Trump, according to a new Washington Post/ABC poll released Thursday. Democrats received 33 percent of the blame, while 22 percent of survey respondents said they were not sure.
Let’s be honest, she doesn’t understand much of anything.I guess she doesn't understand how funding in DC works.
I’m not saying they should surrender everything either. But the 60 votes is designed to force compromise. So negotiations and a middle ground is what I would like. Wouldn’t expect them to accept full roll backs of everything in a previous bill.Why would the republicans fold here? The dems basically are asking to roll back a large part of the changes implemented in the BBB.
It’s a bad look for Democrats. The are wearing the brunt of this shutdown. I predict they fold before their constituents lose their snap benefits.I’m not saying they should surrender everything either. But the 60 votes is designed to force compromise. So negotiations and a middle ground is what I would like. Wouldn’t expect them to accept full roll backs of everything in a previous bill.
There are two sides, and it has seemed to me people who lean right are going to blame left, and vice versa.It’s a bad look for Democrats. The are wearing the brunt of this shutdown. I predict they fold before their constituents lose their snap benefits.
the Senate had a vote, last week I think, to fund pay for essential services, but democrats voted that down also.I’m not saying they should surrender everything either. But the 60 votes is designed to force compromise. So negotiations and a middle ground is what I would like. Wouldn’t expect them to accept full roll backs of everything in a previous bill.
there are always two sides, and both have valid points. It all comes down to what is the objective here. It's hard for me to see what the Democrats are trying to accomplish, and so far when asked they haven't been able to explain. They keep saying 24 million people will lose health insurance, but as I posted earlier, they have a $1.5 trillion proposal on the table, and the ACA subsidies are only about 20% of that amount. Plus, as I posted yesterday I believe, the subsidies make up only a small part of the ACA cost increases that are coming in 2026.There are two sides, and it has seemed to me people who lean right are going to blame left, and vice versa.
Dems folding won’t surprise me tho. It’s what they do.
There are two sides but one winner. And democrats are currently losing on this issue.There are two sides, and it has seemed to me people who lean right are going to blame left, and vice versa.
Dems folding won’t surprise me tho. It’s what they do.
Yes, I am not shocked you feel that way.There are two sides but one winner. And democrats are currently losing on this issue.
Me, Democrat Fetterman, union bosses, people about to lose their snap , and CNN polls all feel that way.Yes, I am not shocked you feel that way.
Me, Democrat Fetterman, union bosses, people about to lose their snap , and CNN polls all feel that way.
and yet the Washington post called for DEMOCRATS to end the shutdown. This far right newspaper knows where the blame lies, even if you don't.
First, it's only a minor part. Second, Trump effectively (and unconstitutionally) rolled back prior Congressional budget appropriations via a whole raft of spending impoundments. So spare us your caterwauling.Why would the republicans fold here? The dems basically are asking to roll back a large part of the changes implemented in the BBB.
They're both biased. But the difference is that you seek to project the image of a guy who is in the middle of the political spectrum even while espousing the Republican party line on every issue. You could not even admit that it was a mistake for the Trump Administration to allow live munitions to be fired over Interstate 5 while it was open, which is precisely what would have happened had Governor Newsom not closed I-5..So how can that be biased? Republicans passed the CR in the House. 52 republicans have voted "yes" in the Senate. About 44 democrats have voted "no" on passing the CR, about the same amount voted "no" on breaking out pay for the military. Now you're going to tell me that republicans should negotiate. I understand the democrat talking point. But if what you're saying is that my position is biased because of my statement above, is your's any less biased because you blame republicans?
I'm not taking the Republican position, I'm taking the position of congressional legislative process, and I am in the middle of the political spectrum. It's just right now democrats seem to have moved so far left that even what used to be a center left position now seems to be almost far right.They're both biased. But the difference is that you seek to project the image of a guy who is in the middle of the political spectrum even while espousing the Republican party line on every issue. You could not even admit that it was a mistake for the Trump Administration to allow live munitions to be fired over Interstate 5 while it was open, which is precisely what would have happened had Governor Newsom not closed I-5..
I'm not taking the Republican position, I'm taking the position of congressional legislative process, and I am in the middle of the political spectrum. It's just right now democrats seem to have moved so far left that even what used to be a center left position now seems to be almost far right.
The Senate rules require a 60 vote count to invoke cloture. You know that! That means that Republican and democrats have to join together to pass the CR. So if nearly all republicans are voting to pass the CR and nearly all democrats are voting against it, to include a vote to fund government essential employees, then who is controlling the government shutdown? Who is controlling the process? Even the democrat base, unions, who recognise the process, are calling for democrats to end the shutdown.
Now I know you will bring up "well, the Republicans should negotiate", which by the way when you accuse me of being biased, is the democrat position. Sure republicans can negotiate, but in the case of the shutdown, they voted to keep the government open. Now, even you, who shows no biases, have to admit that. What do you want them to negotiate, they've already passed, or voted to pass, the bill. I know you, of totally open mind, find this hard to accept, but from a process perspective, your democrats are on the wrong side of this issue.
Plus, as I'm sure your aware, they have a $1.5 trillion proposal on the table...which includes significantly more than the ACA subsidies. Should both sides have negotiated the original proposed budget? Sure they should have, just like they should have when democrats controlled the house, Senate and presidency, just like they should have when democrats passed the ACA. But for some reason, democrats and republicans in our government like to stick fingers in each others eyes rather than work together. Just look at the posts on this board. How many posters do you see that can look at issues and see the positions of each side? You, dpic, firegiver, Tboone, tigergrowls, fat piggy? All of them, you don't see both sides, only their own. Why do you and the other left leaning folks dispose Trump so much, why do those on the right only see the good? I worked the Congress for years, it was never like this. Sure each side had their positions, but in the end they worked together for the good of the American people. There were few shutdowns before 1995-1996, that's because our leaders made their points and then worked together. If Clinton and Gingrich could work together on reforms so should our current leaders. But democrats, even you have to admit, really are extremely anti trump, and simply can't work with him, but become "outraged" when he won't work with them.
In the case of the live fire exercises, which I fail to see has anything to do with a government shutdown, I said that I would not have done it. What more do you want me to say? Impeach trump? Governments due stupid things. Neither Republican nor democrats have a monopoly on dumb.
By the way, if I were Trump or Johnson, I would go on national TV and say something to the effect...the democrat shutdown is having disastrous effects on the US...pay for military civilians, ATC: air traffic delays etc you know the rest. We, (the good guys) have decided that enough is enough. The Democrats have said they want to negotiate the ACA subsidies. We will do that effective tomorrow. In return, at the hour of the meeting the Senate will conduct a vote to reopen the government. If democrats are true to their word, that vote will be positive, and the government will reopen. We will do what democrats have been demanding. The rest is up to them.
and see what happens