Maybe Germans, but this is the most damning article I've read regarding Petrino.

anon1751035439

Redshirt
Mar 16, 2009
974
0
0
It's bythat arrogant bastardDoyel.

<p style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 12px">Bobby Petrino has to be fired.</p><p style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 12px">You can write that without being happy about it. You can think that without being an ogre. You can know that, just like you know two and two gives you four, because this is a matter of math and logic, not wrath and loathing.</p><p style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 12px">Bobby Petrino has to be fired, and not because he had an inappropriate relationship. Petrino has to be fired, and not because the other woman was on the back of his motorcycle when he ran it off the road, injuring himself. Petrino has to be fired, and not even because he lied to the police -- and his bosses -- about the woman on the back of his bike when he ran it off the road.</p><p style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 12px"></p>

A man can do all of those things and survive, both with his boss and in the court of public opinion. Even in my opinion. As bad as it is to lie to police about having a passenger on your bike when you crashed it -- and lying to your bosses in the process -- it's not so bad that I'd scream,Fire him!Because there are circumstances there, human circumstances that don't trump moral or legal obligations, but still must be considered.</p>

Petrino lied about the woman on his bike to save his marriage. Noble? No, he's not noble. But that's why he lied, and I think we all get that. Couple that human reaction toArkansas' return to national prominence under Petrino, and you can see how Arkansas would overlook the lie to the police -- even the lie toArkansas-- and allow Petrino to return.</p>

But that woman on the back of Petrino's bike? He hired her last week. Gave her a paid position in the Arkansas football offices.</p>

Arkansas can't overlook that.</p>

So it's like I said, Bobby Petrino has to be fired. Not just has to be fired -- but will be fired. If you're an Arkansas fan who wants Petrino to survive this, get ready because it has to happen.Putting Petrino on administrative leavewas merely the first step for Arkansas. Petrino can't survive what he did, and I'm not talking about the wreck or even the lie.</p>

Petrino can't survive hiring his apparent mistress.</p>

Let me be as clear about this as possible: The relationship, the crash and the lie havenothingto do with why Petrino will be fired.</p>

Had the crash never happened, but Arkansas had discovered some other way -- maybe an anonymous phone call -- that Petrino had hired this woman, Arkansas would have to fire him. Because while there are mistakes you can make as a human being and be forgiven, there are mistakes you cannot make as an employee and keep your job.</p>

You understanding me? I'm not saying -- not at all -- that in the grand scheme of things, hiring her is the worst thing Petrino did. It's not.</p>

As a human being, cheating on his wife -- cheating with the fiancée of another man -- is the worst thing Petrino did in this story. But you don't get fired for cheating on a spouse.</p>

You do, however, get fired for carrying on with an employee. Especially if it started before you hired the employee. We're talking textbook sexual harassment, though I don't imagine the other woman, Jessica Dorrell, is getting much sympathy these days. She was cheating on her fiancé, and she was cheating with the husband of another woman. I get it: Dorrell is not a sympathetic figure to the general public.</p>

But the University of Arkansas is not the general public. The University of Arkansas is a public school with an endowment of more than $1 billion and an annual budget of more than $500 million, and lots of those bucks would be on the line if Jessica Dorrell ever decided to sue her boss at the University of Arkansas on the grounds of sexual harassment.</p>

As repulsive as this whole argument might sound, that is why Petrino has to be fired. Not because he was a bad husband, a lying employee or even a justice-obstructing citizen of the state. He has to be fired because he made Arkansas vulnerable to a monstrous lawsuit, and Arkansas cannot accept that.</p>

Nor should Arkansas accept that, let me add. Jessica Dorrell isn't entirely sympathetic, but she is the victim of sexual harassment. We can differ on that point, and I'm thinking lots of you will disagree, but sexual harassment is about power -- one person has it over the other -- and Petrino had it over Dorrell. She's 25, half his age. She was once an athlete at Arkansas, the same athletic department where Petrino is the highest-paid, highest-profile employee. She had some sort of entry-level fundraising position with the Razorback Foundation, which exists primarily to fund Petrino's football program, when she was hired by Petrino to be his student-athlete development coordinator for football.</p>

This was sexual harassment, and this happened under the banner of the University of Arkansas. And it got exposed.</p>

All of which leaves Arkansas with only one choice.</p>

Bobby Petrino has to be fired. To be honest with you, I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet.</p>
 

FreeDawg

Senior
Oct 6, 2010
3,747
405
68
And the pragmatist in me likes it. If Auburn and Arkansas take a tumble we can move up the ladder a bit. But thats a nice read, thanks for posting tcreb
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,489
3,765
113
I may have over looked it, but what about other candidates for the job she was given? To me that seems like where the greatest threat for lawsuit will come from. Unless they let either her or the fiancée go, but keep Petrino. The **** will hit the fan then.
 

kired

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2008
6,837
2,051
113
I went through a whole class on this crap recently - I don't see any way they can't fire him. Letting him off the hook kind of sets a precedent to other employees that you can hire some hot chick just because you're banging her.<div>
</div><div>Now, college coaches areworshiped& can get away with a lot more than the average person... so who knows. But if this was the average Joe at XYZ Corp and all this came to light, he'd likely be good as gone.</div>
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,663
274
83
and god knows they do, the precedents keeping him will set will dog them forever. I haven't read the article above but calling security instead of 911 would have probably saved his sorry ***.
 

jcdawgman18

Redshirt
Jul 1, 2008
1,379
0
36
The reason that there's a police report is a passerby called 911 even after Petrino asked him not to. He just called his assigned state trooper.
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,489
3,765
113
How much longer until it comes out that he had been drinking.
 

sardis

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2008
411
0
0
it appears that Larry Hendren, the caller, may be a judge. Hog fans are saying he had to make the 911 call because he is a judge and for that reason, don't harass him.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
"she is the victim of sexual harassment"

An affair between an employee and their boss isn't automatically sexual harassment. That's complete ********.

But I agree he'll get fired.
 

Woof Man Jack

Redshirt
Apr 20, 2006
946
0
0
Courts and employers generally use the definition of sexual harassment contained in the guidelines of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This language has also formed the basis for most state laws prohibiting sexual harassment. The guidelines state:</p>
Unwelcome
sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or
physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when</p> [list type=decimal][*]submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or <span style="font-weight: bold;">condition of an individual's employment,</span>[*]submission
to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is <span style="font-weight: bold;">used as the basis
for employment decisions </span>affecting such individuals, or[*]<span style="font-weight: bold;">such
conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an
individual's work performance</span> or creating an intimidating, hostile, or
offensive working environment. (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11 [1980])[/list]

</p>

Petrino's *** is grass.
</p>
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Wow. I'll concede the legal point. And I agree that he'll be fired.

But I'll never believe she was sexually harassed by any layman's definition of the word.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when

submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment,
submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals, or



...so it could be completely concentual and still be sexual harassment.
 

BulldogBlitz

Heisman
Dec 11, 2008
14,746
16,786
113
...even if she'd been buffing his dolphin for the last year (and only hired last week)...

he'll drop a full division in football, or have to be a talking head.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
54,185
22,053
113
she can claim she was and there's no court in the world that wouldn't find in her favor. Petrino was an idiot for having the affair, but hiring her to work for him was umbelievably stupid. The University of Arkansas probably has good grounds to sue him personally for whatever they wind up having to pay out to her.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Issue public apology, "handle Petrino's discipline internally", pay off blondie in exchange for not getting sued?

But I guess you can never make a settlement on a criminal charge. With the DA maybe, but not with a victim? Or is there no criminal element to this? If not, they could pay her off.