Military Strikes on Iran Imminent

[ANEW]

Yeah i figure facebook to be mom's keeping up family and friends, announcing new babies and trading recipies.

and then there is blusky. i don't have that one either. but i can only imagine it's it's next level crazy from what i see posted here from time to time.

 

[tigres88]

Yeah i figure facebook to be mom's keeping up family and friends, announcing new babies and trading recipies.

and then there is blusky. i don't have that one either. but i can only imagine it's it's next level crazy from what i see posted here from time to time.

Bluesky is just the left wings version of Twitter. Similar echo chamber, which is no more extreme than Twitter (both Hella extreme), just with a left wing bias.

Truth social is the next level crazy social media. That and Facebook imo

 

[dpic73]

Yeah i figure facebook to be mom's keeping up family and friends, announcing new babies and trading recipies.

and then there is blusky. i don't have that one either. but i can only imagine it's it's next level crazy from what i see posted here from time to time.

Bluesky is just a forum for people who fled X when Elon took over - it's for people that didn't want to be assaulted by a thousand maga-bots every time they made a comment and who at one time received a blue check for being a notable person instead of any Joe Schmoe who paid $8.00 a month to have their posts prioritized. Threads is popular for the same reason.

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

The school that was hit by a failed Iranian rocket?

Maybe the Iranians targeted the children’s school with the rocket and then issued a fake news report to try to disparage the IDF

It’s good propaganda to make the other side barbarian

You have got to consider the Mullah supported gunning down hanging and torturing 50,000 plus Iranian protesters

What’s a few school children

 

[Moogy]

Bluesky is just the left wings version of Twitter. Similar echo chamber, which is no more extreme than Twitter (both Hella extreme), just with a left wing bias.

Truth social is the next level crazy social media. That and Facebook imo

Truth social and Twitter are especially crazy because their head honchos drive/promote/allow the crazy. Elon frequently trolls using alternative facts, and when he posts things that are later proven wrong, like a good fascist, he never goes back and apologizes or explains ... he's already moved on to the next troll. But his "successes" elsewhere serve to give him unwarranted legitimacy in the socio-political media arena. I've never experienced Bluesky ... I actually never experienced Truth Social directly, but plenty of the content there is "cross promoted" elsewhere, while I've never seen anyone reference Bluesky content in other media, so that could be an extremist cesspool, as well ... but I wouldn't know.

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

Not really. I was 18-19 and in college. I was probably partying or slipping out of some dorm in the horseshoe.

But I can look at the total air dominance, total sea dominance, complete elimination of several layers of leadership, zero aircraft shot down by Iran, etc and confidently say this is a special kind of asskicking.

And it couldn’t happen to a more deserving group. The most evil major country leadership in the world. Huge funders of terrorism. Oppressors of women. A country living in fear of terrorist leadership, desperate to be free.

The world will be a better place because of this. We should all be celebrating like the Iranians and Persians are.

AMEN

 

[tigres88]

Truth social and Twitter are especially crazy because their head honchos drive/promote/allow the crazy. Elon frequently trolls using alternative facts, and when he posts things that are later proven wrong, like a good fascist, he never goes back and apologizes or explains ... he's already moved on to the next troll. But his "successes" elsewhere serve to give him unwarranted legitimacy in the socio-political media arena. I've never experienced Bluesky ... I actually never experienced Truth Social directly, but plenty of the content there is "cross promoted" elsewhere, while I've never seen anyone reference Bluesky content in other media, so that could be an extremist cesspool, as well ... but I wouldn't know.

I mean, I understand you feel this way and I do for the most part as well. But that's also inherent bias in your view that the average American doesn't see or believe.

To a large percentage of the population, Twitter is a free speech haven and Elon has allowed it to be so.

If you can't have nuance when seeing these things from other perspectives, regardless what you think is true, you're no better than they are.

But alas we've had this convo before and you just get all upset

 

[ANEW]

Truth social and Twitter are especially crazy because their head honchos drive/promote/allow the crazy. Elon frequently trolls using alternative facts, and when he posts things that are later proven wrong, like a good fascist, he never goes back and apologizes or explains ... he's already moved on to the next troll. But his "successes" elsewhere serve to give him unwarranted legitimacy in the socio-political media arena. I've never experienced Bluesky ... I actually never experienced Truth Social directly, but plenty of the content there is "cross promoted" elsewhere, while I've never seen anyone reference Bluesky content in other media, so that could be an extremist cesspool, as well ... but I wouldn't know.

I don't have truth social either. Pick your social network and you can find t loony toons. But you probably don't get all flavors of loony tunes on each network.

 

[Aardvark86]

Jesus Christ you're pathetic

Well, at the very least, it may be that a fair way of putting it is "the school and nearby other buildings."

Interesting seeing that the recent sat analysis indicates several targets in the immediate vicinity. Without diminishing the tragedy of innocents dying, intentionally or otherwise and regardless of age, it does raise a question relating to the potential "aggregation" of casualties, particularly given the nature of this particular vicinity.

 

[Aardvark86]

Yeah i figure facebook to be mom's keeping up family and friends, announcing new babies and trading recipies.

and then there is blusky. i don't have that one either. but i can only imagine it's it's next level crazy from what i see posted here from time to time.

actually, it has one great utility: announcing the season concert schedule reveal party for the Limekiln Theater.

 

[Aardvark86]

I don't have truth social either. Pick your social network and you can find t loony toons. But you probably don't get all flavors of loony tunes on each network.

So wait...you're saying they're echo chambers? who knew!?!

 

[dpic73]

Truth social and Twitter are especially crazy because their head honchos drive/promote/allow the crazy. Elon frequently trolls using alternative facts, and when he posts things that are later proven wrong, like a good fascist, he never goes back and apologizes or explains ... he's already moved on to the next troll. But his "successes" elsewhere serve to give him unwarranted legitimacy in the socio-political media arena. I've never experienced Bluesky ... I actually never experienced Truth Social directly, but plenty of the content there is "cross promoted" elsewhere, while I've never seen anyone reference Bluesky content in other media, so that could be an extremist cesspool, as well ... but I wouldn't know.

I don't find Bluesky to be extremist at all. IMO, it's more intellectual and wonky than other platforms, with a lot of experts in their fields doing deeper dives on subjects than you'll see in other forums. It's why you don't see it being shared a lot because it doesn't provide the quick dopamine hits or gotchas that other platforms provide.

 

[PawPride]

Curious if there's any evidence to support this claim. Sibal seems like he has some credibility given his bona fides, but I'm struggling to wrap my head around us actually doing this. Apparently, the Dinas may have been unarmed since that exercise requires ships to be in "peace protocol", but I'll defer to the more knowledgeable military minds on here (@ANEW).

 

[ANEW]

Curious if there's any evidence to support this claim. Sibal seems like he has some credibility given his bona fides, but I'm struggling to wrap my head around us actually doing this. Apparently, the Dinas may have been unarmed since that exercise requires ships to be in "peace protocol", but I'll defer to the more knowledgeable military minds on here (@ANEW).

I'm not a squid and i don't know what the arrangements betweeen india and Iran was. Or standard custom. Entirely possible. Maybe even probable.

It doesn't matter anyway. With ammo or without That ship, by itself, up against a Virgina class attack boat shooting Mk48 ADCAP torpedos was 100% doomed anyway. Look up Solumani Class Corvettes. Limited air defense, zero anti- sub capability . Designed for attacking surface ships with missiles and then trying to scoot.

Sinking that ship like we did was a 100% flex. Message to Iran that we are in a vendetta kind of mood and that the gloves are 100% off, for the first time in a long time. Actions backing the rhetoric. This admin/the us is serious. Surrender (when/if we give you a chance to ) or die. Same message to the rest of the world that this admin at least is not afraid to use every bit of our national power. The other part of the flex was that we were able to know where it was, track it in the middle of the ocean and get that sub into a firing position to take it out.

And the other poster from India was correct. One in international waters it's no longer india's problem. The ship could have elected to sit out the war in india or a 3rd party port.

 

[Moogy]

I mean, I understand you feel this way and I do for the most part as well. But that's also inherent bias in your view that the average American doesn't see or believe.

To a large percentage of the population, Twitter is a free speech haven and Elon has allowed it to be so.

If you can't have nuance when seeing these things from other perspectives, regardless what you think is true, you're no better than they are.

But alas we've had this convo before and you just get all upset

We've literally never had this conversation before. And, simply put, you didn't say anything ... meaningless platitudes, but nothing else. What's inherent bias in my view? Use your words. I didn't speak as to whether Twitter is a "free speech haven," so that's entirely inconsequential commentary on your part. Your commentary was sweepingly broad nothingness, entirely lacking nuance.

In sum, you provided zero criticism of my actual commentary, but did somehow try to personally insult me with mischaracterizations, which seems to be your modus operandi. And it failed, yet again.

If you have anything substantive, provide it.

 

[baltimorened]

Maybe the Iranians targeted the children’s school with the rocket and then issued a fake news report to try to disparage the IDF

It’s good propaganda to make the other side barbarian

You have got to consider the Mullah supported gunning down hanging and torturing 50,000 plus Iranian protesters

What’s a few school children

so far I haven't seen any definitive cause of the school destruction. Anybody seen anything factual?

 

[Moogy]

I don't have truth social either. Pick your social network and you can find t loony toons. But you probably don't get all flavors of loony tunes on each network.

Again, there is a difference between any old social media platform, where whoever can post practically whatever they want ... and one where the owner is a powerful cult of personality who, himself, rallies the troops while posting inaccuracies and antagonizing those with whom he doesn't agree.

I've actually tried brief anecdotal experiments with Twitter ... I have my "following" list where I use the platform for meaningful information and interaction ... but then I use the "for you" to mess around. As I've said, I use it to watch the far right extremist propagandists do their thing, and I watch how the algorithm drives "for you" content. I've tried, on occasion, to switch it up, and I try to view as much pro-Dem, or anti-MAGAt, content as possible to see what the algorithm does ... it does then tend to provide somewhat more of that like-kind content, but it's still filled the far right crazies, too. And, in just a short time of looking at a bit of far right extremist propaganda for profit (Walsh, Loomer, etc.), my "for you" is just flooded entirely with that stuff. I've tried prolonged stretches of looking at pro-Dem and anti-MAGAt stuff, and it just doesn't take over the "for you" as wholly, and it doesn't "stick" as long.

 

[Moogy]

So wait...you're saying they're echo chambers? who knew!?!

They're more insidious than just echo chambers ... that characterization presumes you just sit around hearing what you want to hear. Instead, they grab your hand and they lead you to the loudest part of the echo chamber, and into parts of the chamber where more and more extremist material echoes. It's how MAGAts are radicalized.

 

[ANEW]

Again, there is a difference between any old social media platform, where whoever can post practically whatever they want ... and one where the owner is a powerful cult of personality who, himself, rallies the troops while posting inaccuracies and antagonizing those with whom he doesn't agree.

I've actually tried brief anecdotal experiments with Twitter ... I have my "following" list where I use the platform for meaningful information and interaction ... but then I use the "for you" to mess around. As I've said, I use it to watch the far right extremist propagandists do their thing, and I watch how the algorithm drives "for you" content. I've tried, on occasion, to switch it up, and I try to view as much pro-Dem, or anti-MAGAt, content as possible to see what the algorithm does ... it does then tend to provide somewhat more of that like-kind content, but it's still filled the far right crazies, too. And, in just a short time of looking at a bit of far right extremist propaganda for profit (Walsh, Loomer, etc.), my "for you" is just flooded entirely with that stuff. I've tried prolonged stretches of looking at pro-Dem and anti-MAGAt stuff, and it just doesn't take over the "for you" as wholly, and it doesn't "stick" as long.

I'm the wrong guy to have a meaningful convo or even a flat out e-fight name calling session on this topic. Before elon, i know the US Gov't and the company worked together to censor. I treat that as fact. i believe, it was a purposeful attempt to propagandize and sway elections. Now that elon has the ball i don't think it unreasonable that there could be a right finger on the scale. how intentional it is, i dont' know. Is the USG involved. I woudld't know. If i had a twitter account i might try the same thing and see what i found for myself.

 

[dpic73]

I guess he got Bored of Peace



Al Habtoor's a major figure: billionaire, former diplomat, outspoken political voice in the Gulf. When he talks, UAE leadership's listening.

His questions:

* Was this your decision or Netanyahu's pressure?
* Did you calculate collateral damage before firing?
* You placed GCC countries at the heart of danger they didn't choose
* Your "Board of Peace" initiatives were funded by Gulf states. Now we're getting attacked. Where did that money go?
* You promised no wars. You've conducted operations in 7 countries: Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Iran, Venezuela
* 658 airstrikes in your first year back = Biden's entire term (which you criticized)
* War costs $40-65 billion for operations, possibly $210 billion total
* Your approval rating's down 9% in 400 days
* Americans were promised peace. They're getting war funded by their taxes

The sharpest line: "Before the ink has dried on your Board of Peace initiative, we find ourselves facing military escalation that endangers the entire region. So where did those initiatives go?"

Al Habtoor's not some random critic. He's establishment. Connected. When UAE elites start publicly questioning Trump's decision-making, that's America's closest Arab allies saying "we didn't sign up for this."

The letter ends: "True leadership is not measured by war decisions, but by wisdom, respect for others, and pushing toward achieving peace."

 

[dpic73]