The boycott is over. The players backed down.IMHO, simple solution:
- UofM administration should withdraw from bowl immediately to allow bowl time to find a replacement
- all players boycotting practice should have their scholarships suspended indefinitely
- players whose scholarships are suspended would have the right to earn back their scholarships by participating in Spring practice or rehab and team meetings if they are injured and can't fully participate in Spring practice
You are joking I hope. Ragan didn't do this because of their right to negotiate a contract. He did it because of the effect of shutting down the entire air travel grid of the United States. Some people work in an area where they simply cannot refuse to do their job as a group. Presidents have done this sort of thing with the railroads in the time of war. In fact, the right to strike was revoked during WW II by Franklin Roosevelt. There are a lot of reasons why the middle class has suffered but this wasn't one of them. How about NAFTA?And THAT VERY MOMENT was the start of the decline of the middle class in America. Thank you Ronnie!
Look, it's OK to complain about conservative positions & presidents here, but don't complain about lib behaviors/positions or the thread likely gets locked.You are joking I hope. Ragan didn't do this because of their right to negotiate a contract. He did it because of the effect of shutting down the entire air travel grid of the United States. Some people work in an area where they simply cannot refuse to do their job as a group. Presidents have done this sort of thing with the railroads in the time of war. In fact, the right to strike was revoked during WW II by Franklin Roosevelt. There are a lot of reasons why the middle class has suffered but this wasn't one of them. How about NAFTA?
What I gathered from most articles is the suspension is from violated school conduct rules and not legal issues. Cleared from legal issues does not clear you from civil (i.e. School conduct) rules which the school feels they violated.. I think you need to be careful on which causes you choose to stand up for.
The boycott is over. The players backed down.
Ok they changed their stance. Whatever you want to call it they called off the boycott, will go back to practice and will now play in the Bowl game.Backed down is not a PR term.
The players brought national attention to a school issue where they feel their teammates are being treated poorly and now they go to a bowl where much of the discussion during the broadcast will be about their issue. "Backed down" does not appear to be what they did.
The school has conduct policies which they felt this incident violated. Doesn't matter if there were some players who felt it was unfair or not. The University has the right to impose their own conduct policies.Backed down is not a PR term.
The players brought national attention to a school issue where they feel their teammates are being treated poorly and now they go to a bowl where much of the discussion during the broadcast will be about their issue. "Backed down" does not appear to be what they did.
I think you need to be careful on which causes you choose to stand up for.
Ok they changed their stance. Whatever you want to call it they called off the boycott, will go back to practice and will now play in the Bowl game.
The school has conduct policies which they felt this incident violated. Doesn't matter if there were some players who felt it was unfair or not. The University has the right to impose their own conduct policies.
If I were the coach, I would not go. I would tell them, you do not dictate the rules. I would either kick those players who initiated this off the team or I would run them until they wanted to quit.
I would not. Once you let the team and the players decide they will dictate how things will be done and what they will accept as far as rules go, you have lost control.Sorry I used the word "unfair." The players concerns involved issues of due process and other legal concerns.
I bet if you were the coach, you would go to the bowl game and be thankful you have a job.
I would not. Once you let the team and the players decide they will dictate how things will be done and what they will accept as far as rules go, you have lost control.
We just see it different I guess. What if they decide the practices are too long or unfair? What if he benches a player and they think it's unfair and don't like it?How long will you be a football coach without players?
Sounds like the whole team would lose their scholarships then. The article also stated they would still do it even if they threaten to take scholarships away. This is a screwed up situation. It would suck to be fans of the team who are planning on this trip. Plus it would suck for their opponent if Minnesota is forced to forfeit. Is there enough time to bring in an alternate opponent, refund tickets, and resell new tickets? I am betting the school will end up giving into their demands or talk some sense into the team.