More Nebraska turmoil

Jul 3, 2022
878
893
93

That's not quite what happened but whatever. KSNB. Nationally, this story is perfect for social influencers to take their version and run with it. Their audience won't care to know the difference. It's the same with the extreme right or the extreme left. But locally, I'm going to go with the police investigation and actual news station reports so that I know what actually happened.
 
Last edited:

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
13,952
2,171
113
That's not quite what happened but whatever. KSNB. Nationally, this story is perfect for social influencers to take their version and run with it. Their audience won't care to know the difference. It's the same with the extreme right or the extreme left. But locally, I'm going to go with the police investigation and actual news station reports so that I know what actually happened.
I can see the kids staying off the streets, next someone shouting at them, then a kid throwing something at the car (did it hit the actual driver?), then the driver getting out trying to discipline a kid and then getting whooped up on.

The GIPS Superintendent sounds like a huge wimp.
 

RBigredMax1

All-Conference
Jul 16, 2025
1,325
2,203
113
That's not quite what happened but whatever. KSNB. Nationally, this story is perfect for social influencers to take their version and run with it. Their audience won't care to know the difference. It's the same with the extreme right or the extreme left. But locally, I'm going to go with the police investigation and actual news station reports so that I know what actually happened.
So the kids didn’t throw anything and that guy just got out and started yelling at them for no reason?
 

Mack In Motion

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
5,937
3,430
113
So the kids didn’t throw anything and that guy just got out and started yelling at them for no reason?
The article says:

"This particular situation, a water bottle being thrown and hitting somebody in the face or in the head, caused them to retaliate,” Elliott said in an interview Tuesday.
 

4.6.3

Senior
Jun 4, 2022
747
855
93
I’m not sure what happened here, but if a teacher is leading kids outside on a protest and one of those kids gets hurt, that seems like opening the door to a huge lawsuit.
As soon as a teacher leaves the school they should be terminated. They abandoned the job the taxpayer pays them to do. Just. *******. Teach.
 

WTFMatt

Senior
Feb 14, 2010
850
661
93
I can see the kids staying off the streets, next someone shouting at them, then a kid throwing something at the car (did it hit the actual driver?), then the driver getting out trying to discipline a kid and then getting whooped up on.

The GIPS Superintendent sounds like a huge wimp.

Typical lib argument. I don't care what the driver said (First Amendment), if a student threw a water bottle, brick, or a stuffed animal, the student needs to be expelled. No exceptions.
 

Steely Dannebrog

All-Conference
Jul 8, 2025
823
1,169
93
The cartels are basically running Mexico now. That wall can't be high enough, long enough, nor wide enough.

Maybe these kids need a Sinaloa study abroad to get the message.
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
13,952
2,171
113
Typical lib argument. I don't care what the driver said (First Amendment), if a student threw a water bottle, brick, or a stuffed animal, the student needs to be expelled. No exceptions.
Mostly agree, the stuffed animal part.... The object being thrown would have to potentially cause some sort of harm.
 

BetterRed1

Junior
Jul 6, 2006
12,871
378
66
Teach me one piece of history. Just one and we'll see if you actually know history.
I’m not a teacher doofus. I must have hit a nerve. I know one thing. If I was a young person today with kids, I’d homeschool. What these kids get in public school today is garbage.
 
Nov 28, 2016
3,358
777
92
What about drug addicts and the disabled? Should each person have their own "drug addict" to take care of, or a person with intellectual disabilities? Then we will realize it is coming out of our pocket and stop supporting such people with our taxes. I can only assume that a healthy person from central America is more "valuable" than an American on opiates.
Drug Addicts I feel are a lot different than disabled or a person with intellectual disabilities.

Many disabled and people with intellectual disabilities do have a family network that does care and provide for them.

Drug Addicts made a selfish choice that their addiction is more important than their health, their well being, their family, and society. They add no value to society. They can’t hold down a job and don’t help contribute as a tax payer. Most are homeless and commit crimes to support their habit. Sponsoring them would only enable them. It is up to them to admit they have an addiction, that they are powerless, and find the steps for a better life.

So yes…I would pay to help US citizens who are disabled and US Citizens with intellectual disabilities. If a US citizen with drug addiction took the steps the help themselves, then probably I would contribute to a fund to help them stay clean and only if they remained clean. No I would not contribute to a fund helping immigrants who entered this country illegally. I consider it a slap in the face to every immigrant who did go through the lengthy green card or naturalization process. It bothers me that illegals feel they are above this process and it bothers me that some US citizens think this process should not apply because they are here. The fact remains, they entered this country illegally.