Ncaa denies UM qb appeal

BoDawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2010
5,379
2,851
113
The Simpsons GIF by MOODMAN
 

Dawg1976

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
8,121
2,632
113
Meaningless. Courts can fall for the sob story so more to come.
 

FlotownDawg

All-American
Aug 30, 2012
6,844
7,169
113
I don’t see how he gets an injunction. He isn’t challenging JUCO rules like Pavia and the Tennessee quarterback. He is trying to get a medical redshirt from four years ago when there is no evidence that he deserved a medical redshirt. If he was going to get a medical redshirt, it would’ve been given at the time. He didn’t even ask for one then, and is now trying to lie and say he needed one because he’s got a chance to make millions next year as OM’s quarterback. It’s a brazen ploy to circumvent the rules, and I don’t see how it could succeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgsHSV and TPB314

thekimmer

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2012
8,070
2,086
113
Taking things like this to court is BS. An organization like the NCAA has the right to make and enforce their own rules. If this is a jury trial chamblis will win easily. Probably win in any case because the NCAA won’t be able to show harm. At one time the NCAA would drop the hammer on a program for such a stunt (like Larry gillard) but no more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TXDawg.sixpack

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
10,249
7,100
113
I don’t see how he gets an injunction. He isn’t challenging JUCO rules like Pavia and the Tennessee quarterback. He is trying to get a medical redshirt from four years ago when there is no evidence that he deserved a medical redshirt. If he was going to get a medical redshirt, it would’ve been given at the time. He didn’t even ask for one then, and is now trying to lie and say he needed one because he’s got a chance to make millions next year as OM’s quarterback. It’s a brazen ploy to circumvent the rules, and I don’t see how it could succeed.
It's an Ole Miss judge in state court. He will get it.
 

Dawgzilla2

All-Conference
Oct 9, 2022
2,026
2,360
113
I don’t see how he gets an injunction. He isn’t challenging JUCO rules like Pavia and the Tennessee quarterback. He is trying to get a medical redshirt from four years ago when there is no evidence that he deserved a medical redshirt. If he was going to get a medical redshirt, it would’ve been given at the time. He didn’t even ask for one then, and is now trying to lie and say he needed one because he’s got a chance to make millions next year as OM’s quarterback. It’s a brazen ploy to circumvent the rules, and I don’t see how it could succeed.
I think its pretty standard to for athletes to wait until after their fifth year to seek a medical redshirt. The decision is moot until it is clear the athlete is willing and able to compete for another year.

Chambliss' problem is his lack of medical documentation.
 

Msdeltareb

Heisman
Jan 24, 2006
105,378
29,454
93
I don’t see how he gets an injunction. He isn’t challenging JUCO rules like Pavia and the Tennessee quarterback. He is trying to get a medical redshirt from four years ago when there is no evidence that he deserved a medical redshirt. If he was going to get a medical redshirt, it would’ve been given at the time. He didn’t even ask for one then, and is now trying to lie and say he needed one because he’s got a chance to make millions next year as OM’s quarterback. It’s a brazen ploy to circumvent the rules, and I don’t see how it could succeed.
There's no such thing as a medical redshirt in the division Ferris State plays in, so they couldn't request it and wouldn't have worried about documenting it. Chambliss is going to be the QB at Ole Miss next fall and there's really not a thing the NCAA can do about it. F'em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RebChuck

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,605
25,895
113
I think its pretty standard to for athletes to wait until after their fifth year to seek a medical redshirt. The decision is moot until it is clear the athlete is willing and able to compete for another year.

Chambliss' problem is his lack of medical documentation.
Not for a 1st medical redshirt. You generally get that one immediately. You want till after the 5th year to apply for a 2nd medical redshirt. No matter. He'll get the injunction. It looks like he did have his tonsils taken out late one season, and they're claiming he had medical issues from that the whole year. Which is probably all the documentation they'll need. Especially with a Mississippi elected judge from a heavy UMiss district who graduated from UMiss law school. He's getting the injunction. Honestly, I'm not sure why the NCAA is even denying it with everything else they approve.
 

thekimmer

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2012
8,070
2,086
113
Not for a 1st medical redshirt. You generally get that one immediately. You want till after the 5th year to apply for a 2nd medical redshirt. No matter. He'll get the injunction. It looks like he did have his tonsils taken out late one season, and they're claiming he had medical issues from that the whole year. Which is probably all the documentation they'll need. Especially with a Mississippi elected judge from a heavy UMiss district who graduated from UMiss law school. He's getting the injunction. Honestly, I'm not sure why the NCAA is even denying it with everything else they approve.
Why would that not be a conflict of interest?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,605
25,895
113
Why would that not be a conflict of interest?
Same reason having a Bama booster who's donated over $100,000 to their athletic dept rule a professional player eligible to play for Alabama. It is a conflict of interest, but they don't care. Home field advantage in the courts is just as important as it is in sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldog from Birth

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,605
25,895
113
There's no such thing as a medical redshirt in the division Ferris State plays in, so they couldn't request it and wouldn't have worried about documenting it. Chambliss is going to be the QB at Ole Miss next fall and there's really not a thing the NCAA can do about it. F'em.
Not that it matters, but if that's the case, then the NCAA was absolutely right to deny it and any lawsuit should be a slam dunk denial. But I agree, it doesn't matter, he's going to be your QB this fall and there's nothing the NCAA will be able to do about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Msdeltareb

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
21,457
24,949
113
There's no such thing as a medical redshirt in the division Ferris State plays in, so they couldn't request it and wouldn't have worried about documenting it. Chambliss is going to be the QB at Ole Miss next fall and there's really not a thing the NCAA can do about it. F'em.
I think you guys should definitely be antagonizing the NCAA by suing them over an open and shut case that the NCAA has already ruled on twice - while at the same time being under active investigation for blatant tampering involving at least two other football programs.

It sounds like a winning strategy to me. I think it's going to work out for you.
 

Msdeltareb

Heisman
Jan 24, 2006
105,378
29,454
93
I think you guys should definitely be antagonizing the NCAA by suing them over an open and shut case that the NCAA has already ruled on twice - while at the same time being under active investigation for blatant tampering involving at least two other football programs.

It sounds like a winning strategy to me. I think it's going to work out for you.
Seriously, what are they gonna do about it? Pull some scholarships? Limit on campus visits? Make us forfeit some games retroactively? Who gives a ****? They’ve got no way to punish anyone in the current environment and it’s all their fault.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: patdog

idog

Freshman
Aug 17, 2010
586
69
28
Seriously, what are they gonna do about it? Pull some scholarships? Limit on campus visits? Make us forfeit some games retroactively? Who gives a ****? They’ve got no way to punish anyone in the current environment and it’s all their fault.
this 17 has it right**
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,605
25,895
113
I think you guys should definitely be antagonizing the NCAA by suing them over an open and shut case that the NCAA has already ruled on twice - while at the same time being under active investigation for blatant tampering involving at least two other football programs.

It sounds like a winning strategy to me. I think it's going to work out for you.
Of course it will work out. What’s the NCAA going to do? We should be this aggressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandwolf.sixpack

TilloDwg

Senior
Aug 25, 2012
390
407
53
I was in Pittsboro at the courthouse today....they are fired up about it. One of the department heads said they should sell tickets.
 

Anon944551

Sophomore
Jan 14, 2026
160
161
43
[/QUOTE]
I was in Pittsboro at the courthouse today....they are fired up about it. One of the department heads said they should sell tickets.

That’s disgusting. So like…what if he gets hurt first game? Not wishing for that or anything. Just sayin