QB was getting hit-going down and dumped it 5 yds short of RB. Cook didn't even look at the RB. Grounding.Screens.
edit. The rb was there.
The receiver doesn't need to be looking at the QB. And if the refs feel the QB's throw was altered by being hit, they'll give him even more leeway.QB was getting hit-going down and dumped it 5 yds short of RB. Cook didn't even look at the RB. Grounding.
The QB wasn't looking at the RB.The receiver doesn't need to be looking at the QB. And if the refs feel the QB's throw was altered by being hit, they'll give him even more leeway.
As long as the ball lands near a receiver.The QB wasn't looking at the RB.
A few yards. Probably a few more if the throw is altered by a defender.How near?
Not a throw, he tried to spike it and it was at least 5 yds short of an eligible receiver that the QB didn't even see.A few yards. Probably a few more if the throw is altered by a defender.
Complete ******** non call. Awful. Cannot believe they let that go. Then a phantom holding. That changed the game.Looked like grounding live at the game. Was it? Both no calls resulted in TDs afterwards.
First one was a "maybe" - with a senior QB on the #4 team I can see him getting the call.
But, that second one, when he was in the air already, on his way to the ground, not looking at anyone... that was complete BS... horrible, horrible call....
First one was a "maybe" - with a senior QB on the #4 team I can see him getting the call.
But, that second one, when he was in the air already, on his way to the ground, not looking at anyone... that was complete BS... horrible, horrible call....