OT: 2022-23 NHL thread….Devils & Rangers & Islanders

A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
He didn't wave the sign at all. This might be worse than the RHJ draft predictions.

He pretty clear fell backwards and bumped into the guys wife/gf.
The guy then punched him.
While not justified, it is actually more justified than just punching because of a sign.
If your going to have an awful take - at least have one that makes sense.

Not really sure how anyone can interpret it differently.
Correct, so not only did he wave in the guys face to antagonize him, he then falls on his wife. But yeah, the guys the victim here. He did nothing lol.

**** around and find out.

Again, i wouldnt have hit him because its 2023 and theres cameras every where and every one wants to sue. But if it was 2008? Alot of people would beat the brakes off the guy
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
Nah. Watch the first video than this one. This one just shows him standing there. First one gives context of him antagonizing the rangers fans literally standing over them waving in their faces
So ******* what? They're allowed to do that without getting assaulted.

You really are an *******.

One cup since the cure of Polio. Never forget that.
 
Last edited:

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
Nah. Watch the first video than this one. This one just shows him standing there. First one gives context of him antagonizing the rangers fans literally standing over them waving in their faces

You’re really arguing that being waved at allows assault???? Dude, you’re smarter than this.

Media has picked up this story….hopefully this a$$ is found
 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
Was this angle posted in this thread yet?
The one at the bottom.
Check to see if his lady friend has healing bruises.

Someone dime this JO out to Newark PD

 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
The best contribution by Kyle in this thread was when he touched the money when they went up 2-0.

True diehards never do that. Thank you Kyle!!

He also said he couldn’t wait to respond to me in the playoffs when Panarin has a career year to tell me how “incredible” the trade for him would turn out to be.

Lololol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnie_B

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,532
89,743
103
All in, I place no blame on the Ranger
Players.
This was a complete system, strategy failure with not even a smidgen of urgency by Gallant to strategically counter the Devils.
Whom by the way are legit-as-****…. But be for-warned, you will have no time and space against the Canes, you will be forced to fight for every inch of ice against a team that will pressure the hell out of you.
Should be a great series.
 

robcac26

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2012
2,981
2,614
83
The best contribution by Kyle in this thread was when he touched the money when they went up 2-0.

True diehards never do that. Thank you Kyle!!
Well in his mind the outcome of this series was a historic and miraculous comeback that nobody could have predicted.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Historically, the Rangers are one of the most underachieving teams ever. It remember reading an article on the athletic a few years ago that backed that up. Besides teams that have never won before, the Rangers were right there.

Tampa, NJ, and Colorado were 3 overachieving teams I remember.
No doubt the Rangers have been an underachieving franchise, but they get a bad rap for the couple of decades after 1940.

Most people don’t know that the Detroit owner Norris at the same time was also the largest shareholder in the Rangers, had a controlling interest in the Blackhawks, and had influence over the Bruins due to mortgages he had issued to their ownership. Unsurprisingly, the Red Wings dominated that era.

I did the math once and it worked out that the Rangers are about one Cup and one Finals appearance short of what they should have done since the 1967 expansion.

With so many teams, if there was perfect parity now each team would only make the Finals every 16 years and win a cup every 32. Instead, we have teams that have overachieved with dynasties and a lot of teams that have underachieved,
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Historically, the Rangers are one of the most underachieving teams ever. It remember reading an article on the athletic a few years ago that backed that up. Besides teams that have never won before, the Rangers were right there.

Tampa, NJ, and Colorado were 3 overachieving teams I remember.
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Well in his mind the outcome of this series was a historic and miraculous comeback that nobody could have predicted.
84% shot of winning the series when you go up 2-0.

It wasnt just a regular 2-0 either, it was an absolute shitkicking 2-0. No team has ever blown a 2-0 lead when outscoring their opponent by 8+ first 2 games. So yes, it was historic
 

robcac26

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2012
2,981
2,614
83
84% shot of winning the series when you go up 2-0.

It wasnt just a regular 2-0 either, it was an absolute shitkicking 2-0. No team has ever blown a 2-0 lead when outscoring their opponent by 8+ first 2 games. So yes, it was historic
Lol you think 84% is a sure thing? 84% means one out of every six 2-0 series ends with the team down 2-0 coming back to win. One out of every six means it probably happens most years. And once again, it wasn't an absolute shitkicking just because the final scores make it seem that way. Take away Kreider being left all alone on the powerplay and those are two 3-1 games, at least one of them with an empty-netter. And even if they were shitkickings, you once again prove your stupidity by thinking a team not performing well in one or two games is a reliable indicator of how the rest of the series will go. It's funny you still think I'm the foolish one for believing the series wasn't over when the Rangers had only won half of the games required to advance even in hindsight when it turns out I was right.
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
Three cups since you won your last.

On another note, beating you guys in 2012 in OT always felt like winning a 4th cup, I was there and it was glorious. So yeah.......
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage

Literally the definition of overachieving vs underachieving.

A team with the 6th worst nhl winning percentage of all time with only one less cups than a team with the 12th best…(and 3 more!!! In the modern era). Yes…one is an overachiever and the other is an underachiever
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
Literally the definition of overachieving vs underachieving.

A team with the 6th worst nhl winning percentage of all time with only one less cups than a team with the 12th best…(and 3 more!!! In the modern era). Yes…one is an overachiever and the other is an underachiever
A lot of those loses he's counting were from the Scouts and Rockies and of course the first few years in Jersey, other than that he's reaching with nothing.
 

nutfromSEC117

All-American
Nov 2, 2002
7,775
5,769
0
MODS. Can we start and keep a Devils only OT thread yet ?????

Is it hockey or devils hating ?????

Happy Ice Hockey GIF by NHL
 
  • Like
Reactions: TM94goRU

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,737
52,407
102
A lot of those loses he's counting were from the Scouts and Rockies and of course the first few years in Jersey, other than that he's reaching with nothing.
Btw, HATE, absolutely HATE that combo sweater they had this year.

And don’t get me started on the black one. 👎

But the other classic one, green and red, was 🔥
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,385
43,487
113
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
Tell me you're not just trolling here, as this is one of your dumbest posts ever and that's truly saying something. The Devils have won 3 Cups in 40 years (48 if you count KC/Den), while the Rangers have won 4 in 96 years (and only one in the years since the Devils have won their 3). And I don't know where you got your stats from, but the Devils winning % is 49.5%, while the Rangers is 45.5%. Your failure is complete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cicero grimes

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,532
89,743
103
84% shot of winning the series when you go up 2-0.

It wasnt just a regular 2-0 either, it was an absolute shitkicking 2-0. No team has ever blown a 2-0 lead when outscoring their opponent by 8+ first 2 games. So yes, it was historic
Devils were the better 5 on 5 team in the first 2 games
They just turned our two best all world players not named Igor, Fox and Panarin into jelly, with no where to go and no one to pass to.
Devils toyed with the Rangers, they were the better 5 on 5 team in game 6 also
 
  • Like
Reactions: TM94goRU
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Three cups since you won your last.

On another note, beating you guys in 2012 in OT always felt like winning a 4th cup, I was there and it was glorious. So yeah.......
We know. Any team you beat us its your cup haha. Congrats on the 5th one yesterday
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,593
6,825
113
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
How old will you be when the Rangers win the Cup again in 2048?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TM94goRU

rurichdog

Heisman
Sep 30, 2006
116,807
14,389
0
Haha now this is a better angle. The guy was clearly pissed and should not have hit the guy.

But this is the classic **** around and find out. He waves in the guys face after he just spent $750 to watch his team get whacked in a game 7, last thing he wants is so punked waving in his face.

In my world this is a shut your mouth and learn your lesson. Dont run to social media like a *****
You are a small and pathetic overgrown child.
 

wisr01

All-Conference
Apr 13, 2006
8,334
3,347
113
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
Record
40 Seasons
(GP---W-----L-----T--OTL-SOL)
3157-1473-1279-219-93-93
0.531
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
You are a small and pathetic overgrown child.
Im just saying, if you
A) stand on a seat over a man in order to look down on him and wave in his face
B) do so with the intent to piss him off
C) finish it up with jumping off your seat and quite literally knocked his wife over

If you get jabbed after that you should just be like “yeahhhh i deserved that one”. Not run to twitter like a little *****
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
You realize devs have the 6th worst win % of any nhl franchise, right? Outside of some teams that played like 300 total games, rangers are 12th best.

Outside of a really good decade devs franchise has been garbage
If you’re including KC & COL it’s fugazzi since no one here gives a **** to what happened prior to 82

3 Cups to 1 since 82 bruh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
If you’re including KC & COL it’s fugazzi since no one here gives a **** to what happened prior to 82

3 Cups to 1 since 82 bruh.
Rangers still have a better record from 1982 to present

If you wanna talk fugazzi, talk the 1995 cup then. Its like lebrons lakers ship
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
Im just saying, if you
A) stand on a seat over a man in order to look down on him and wave in his face
B) do so with the intent to piss him off
C) finish it up with jumping off your seat and quite literally knocked his wife over

If you get jabbed after that you should just be like “yeahhhh i deserved that one”. Not run to twitter like a little bitch20

If you think someone deserves to get punched due to your A..B…and C above…again, you’re an immature child.

I truly don’t think you believe a 20 year old kid at work deserves to be punched twice by an adult man…but who knows
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
If you think someone deserves to get punched due to your A..B…and C above…again, you’re an immature child.

I truly don’t think you believe a 20 year old kid at work deserves to be punched twice by an adult man…but who knows
I wouldnt have punched him personally but i wouldve pushed him.

How would you react if a man (not kid, hes a man), stood on a chair over you, waved in your face to try to piss you off, jumped off the chair and knocked your wife over? You just keep walking? If so, me and you fella, we aint the same. If it was a non-phone/camera age, frankly id beat the brakes off the guy haha. But cant do that in 2023, itll be on video and youd get sued. Different world these days unfortunately
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
I wouldnt have punched him personally but i wouldve pushed him.

How would you react if a man (not kid, hes a man), stood on a chair over you, waved in your face to try to piss you off, jumped off the chair and knocked your wife over? You just keep walking? If so, me and you fella, we aint the same. If it was a non-phone/camera age, frankly id beat the brakes off the guy haha. But cant do that in 2023, itll be on video and youd get sued. Different world these days unfortunately

All the sudden he’s not a kid when you literally called him a kid this morning in a post??? Ok.

Yes. I’d walk away. I’m not an immature man-child who’s gonna resort to physical violence cause I was waved at and jeered at.

We are certainly not the same..man. Thankfully
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
All the sudden he’s not a kid when you literally called him a kid this morning in a post??? Ok.

Yes. I’d walk away. I’m not an immature man-child who’s gonna resort to physical violence cause I was waved at and jeered at.

We are certainly not the same..man. Thankfully
And this is probably why you either

a) arent married or
b) didnt exactly have your pick of the litter

Bad look letting your wife get hit and doing nothing. Especially after the guy who hit your wife antagonized you before doing so
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,080
17,742
97
And this is probably why you either

a) arent married or
b) didnt exactly have your pick of the litter

Bad look letting your wife get hit and doing nothing. Especially after the guy who hit your wife antagonized you before doing so

There’s a ton of reasons I’m not married. Lol.

That’s fine. I think it’s a bad look hitting a 20 year old kid in front of your wife.

Again, we’re two totally different guys.