OT: 2022 World Cup Thread

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
That's what everyone is talking about - no idea why.

To me the biggest play was Zimmerman's reckless foul on Bale in the box. Bale had his back to the goal - it wasn't like he fouled him to prevent some easy point blank shot. Without that PK, we had a very good chance to hold on.
Zimmerman is like a whole different, much better, player when he has Miles Robinson with him back there. He’s been bad every time I’ve seen him since Robinson‘s injury. Makes tons of mistakes in his positioning and in the ball. It’s weird.
 

Roy_Faulker

All-Conference
Feb 7, 2002
4,868
2,618
0
Your second paragraph was the most disappointing thing. Long balls out of the back, and playing down the wing for crosses, is what these Wales players have been doing since they first put on boots so we made it comfortable for them by resorting to that style.

The one time we played fast and right at them we carved them up.

Yes, they didn’t allow much of that in the first half, but in the second half there was more space and I thought the US settled for low percentage crosses instead of taking the Wales defenders on, numerous times.

Team was also too reliant on Puli to create - late in the 2nd half when attacking down the middle on at least 2 occasions Sargent was open to goal or able to run onto a diagonal pass and instead we pushed it out wide.

Hopefully Reyna can give us a run on Friday to help balance out the field.

Adams was man of the match for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

RUTrack94

All-American
Nov 15, 2008
11,343
5,174
113
US had a lot of yellow cards and what was up with causing the penalty kick? Wasted opportunity.

Should beat Iran, but need a minor miracle vs England.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley
Jul 25, 2001
53,200
35,895
0
Zimmerman is like a whole different, much better, player when he has Miles Robinson with him back there. He’s been bad every time I’ve seen him since Robinson‘s injury. Makes tons of mistakes in his positioning and in the ball. It’s weird.
Isn’t it as simple as Zimmerman is built as an attacking central defender and needs speed to cover him.

Robinson swept up all the mistakes…
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildone_rivals

RU Husky

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2011
4,890
2,161
0
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
If Iran sits in a bunker do we have enough creativity to break thru?
That would be the concern. Plus forwards that can hurt us. It is all still there for us but we really won't have group clarity until after Friday. It is possible 3 ties could get us through the way this group looks at the moment.
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,271
0
Isn’t it as simple as Zimmerman is built as an attacking central defender and needs speed to cover him.

Robinson swept up all the mistakes…
Could be that, yes. To be honest, they were so stable at the back that I was spending all my time watching the mids and forwards and thinking about how they could become more prolific scorers.

Now I’m watching the back and wondering what they can do about it. LOL.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,089
19,113
98
That would be the concern. Plus forwards that can hurt us. It is all still there for us but we really won't have group clarity until after Friday. It is possible 3 ties could get us through the way this group looks at the moment.
If Iran beats Wales that would put them on 4 points. They will be in a bunker against us for sure.

If Wales beats Iran, Iran will be out, might open up the game for us.

Wales and Iran tie. Will be a slow game. If we can get a result against England it would be huge. Even a point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

Kbee3

Heisman
Aug 23, 2002
43,724
35,255
0
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
So many times over the years I've seen the Mexican team come back from a near upset by falling down on contact in close and getting the damn penalty shot. I guess Zimmerman never saw those particular games.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
If Iran beats Wales that would put them on 4 points. They will be in a bunker against us for sure.

If Wales beats Iran, Iran will be out, might open up the game for us.

Wales and Iran tie. Will be a slow game. If we can get a result against England it would be huge. Even a point.
Yes a lot of ways this can play out. You also have the possibility of England playing backups last group match having 6 points/ clinched the group with an Iranian Wales tie, giving Wales a golden opportunity there to get a result. Not ideal to be playing England next but we made our bed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,255
43,367
113
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
With VAR, I think they ought to be able to have 2 levels of fouls in the box: one, where the foul obviously didn't take away an imminent scoring opportunity (like today's, where the player fouled has his back to the goal or if player is moving away from the goal) and the second where the foul prevents an imminent goal scoring opportunity. For the first, maybe take the offender off the field for 10 minutes, but no PK, whereas for the 2nd, keep the PK. I also hate PKs to decide any championship - play till you're dead, lol, or just allow unlimited substitutions. And we all hate flopping. But I don't understand these things significantly affecting your ability to enjoy such a fantastic sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodOl'Rutgers

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,255
43,367
113
Yes a lot of ways this can play out. You also have the possibility of England playing backups last group match having 6 points/ clinched the group with an Iranian Wales tie, giving Wales a golden opportunity there to get a result. Not ideal to be playing England next but we made our bed.
Was going to post similarly. If Wales beats Iran and England beats us, it's more likely England doesn't beat Wales, as they wouldn't need to to advance (although England will absolutely still want to win that game against their neighbors) and we would need England to beat Wales in that scenario to have a shot to get out of the group. That's why we almost have to not lose to England.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodOl'Rutgers

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
Was going to post similarly. If Wales beats Iran and England beats us, it's more likely England doesn't beat Wales, as they wouldn't need to to advance (although England will absolutely still want to win that game against their neighbors) and we would need England to beat Wales in that scenario to have a shot to get out of the group. That's why we almost have to not lose to England.
Here's the thing. I can't find the mildone post but he said it better than me in this thread. On your point if we feel we need a point against England (reasonable belief frankly) I think this US team fundamentally is not capable/at its best with a bunker down/draw 0-0 design. So if you are GB do you play aggressive, but then maybe get smoked. Or you tie 2-2 and you are in a very decent spot going in against maybe a finished Iran. I honestly don't know.
 

gmay8

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2005
2,517
2,506
113
Was going to post similarly. If Wales beats Iran and England beats us, it's more likely England doesn't beat Wales, as they wouldn't need to to advance (although England will absolutely still want to win that game against their neighbors) and we would need England to beat Wales in that scenario to have a shot to get out of the group. That's why we almost have to not lose to England.

This is my concern as well... which is why a win today was so vital. If we lose to england 2-0. and Wales beats Iran 2-0... then the last day we have 1 point, Wales has 4, England has 6. The goal differential would also hurt badly. In my opinion if we can't tie England, we go home.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,584
0
Team was also too reliant on Puli to create - late in the 2nd half when attacking down the middle on at least 2 occasions Sargent was open to goal or able to run onto a diagonal pass and instead we pushed it out wide.

Hopefully Reyna can give us a run on Friday to help balance out the field.

Adams was man of the match for sure.
Couldn't believe how tentative Aronson was. He didn't start.. was brought in, presumably, for an energy injection, and he deferred and demured time and again (with the ball on offense.. he did fight to win balls).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Roy_Faulker

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,584
0
Was going to post similarly. If Wales beats Iran and England beats us, it's more likely England doesn't beat Wales, as they wouldn't need to to advance (although England will absolutely still want to win that game against their neighbors) and we would need England to beat Wales in that scenario to have a shot to get out of the group. That's why we almost have to not lose to England.
Had exact same though... England beats us, has their 6 points. Even if everyone beats Iran it will come down to goal differential.. right? Iran is going to fight like hell against the Great Satan. This can get ugly. We best tie or, gulp, beat England.. or at least keep it real close. I can see England not caring to beat Wales and keep USA from advancing.. and maybe they should look at it like that. Hell.. Iran might give Wales as many goals as they need should they be losing early in that game. Assure the USA does not advance.
 

RU Husky

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2011
4,890
2,161
0
With VAR, I think they ought to be able to have 2 levels of fouls in the box: one, where the foul obviously didn't take away an imminent scoring opportunity (like today's, where the player fouled has his back to the goal or if player is moving away from the goal) and the second where the foul prevents an imminent goal scoring opportunity. For the first, maybe take the offender off the field for 10 minutes, but no PK, whereas for the 2nd, keep the PK. I also hate PKs to decide any championship - play till you're dead, lol, or just allow unlimited substitutions. And we all hate flopping. But I don't understand these things significantly affecting your ability to enjoy such a fantastic sport.
I like the way you think. I have argued for the same type of penalty distinction for years.

No argument that it can be an exciting, entertaining sport but way too often it is like war- long stretches of boredom punctuated by a flurry of heart stopping terror or just a flat out boredom fest. I’d rather watch curling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU848789

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
I like the way you think. I have argued for the same type of penalty distinction for years.

No argument that it can be an exciting, entertaining sport but way too often it is like war- long stretches of boredom punctuated by a flurry of heart stopping terror or just a flat out boredom fest. I’d rather watch curling.
One other thing to point out about today. Turner was very shaky. I think his save has overshadowed a lot but frankly I'd expect most top level keepers to get a hand on that one. He will have to stand on his head Friday. A Howard-esque performance and I believe he is capable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

RUevolution36

All-American
Sep 18, 2006
8,165
5,647
113
The injury to and loss of Miles Robinson is huge. Although Ream did very well, IMO. But Robinson created stability for Zimmerman and somehow that allowed our defenders to remain composed, beat pressure using great team play in the back, then quickly transition to a decent attack. Even against strong competition. Big boy style.

That didn’t happen today. We started playing long balls out of the back, caving to the second half pressure. We do that, we’re no better than prior USMNT World Cup teams. And that’s a bad thing.
We looked absolutely great in the first half... why? Because we pressed and won the ball back high up the pitch... and the huge benefit of not needing our **** CB Zimmerman to actually defend. The MF tired out in the 2nd half and Wales discovered that they could just bypass a tiring weston and musah by going over the top on them. Then Zimmerman needed to defend. And he's not good enough at this level. Not against a 6'5 target man and a guy as talented as Bale. That foul was incredibly bad. I can't understand why he is starting over CCV.
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
29,829
21,695
113
Current projections to make the Round of 16, from FiveThirtyEight:

England 93%
USA 45%
Wales 37%
Iran 25%
 

BHSPCRU

Senior
Jun 13, 2007
565
714
93
This team can beat England and although disappointed with the draw, I am still optimistic with us team…I like a well rested Reyna and I truly be,I eve our best soccer is ahead of us…
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
29,829
21,695
113
Question - would you sign up right now for a one goal loss to England?

I might. Especially if it were 3-2 or higher.

Unless we beat England (a longshot), we're going to need to beat Iran regardless. A one-goal loss, in which we score a couple, positions us pretty well I think.
 

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,059
6,268
113
Huge advantage to Wales having Iran next. England may already be through by the time they play Wales. We had a golden opportunity for 3 today and let it get away. Not nearly done, and better than a loss (obviously), but our road remains difficult.
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,255
43,367
113
That was my guess. I don’t know, but we’ll need him on Friday.
On the post game show one of the TV guys said that Coach B said that Reyna will be ready to go on Friday. We'll need him and we're going to need better defending and we're going to need Turner to have a great game.
 

RUevolution36

All-American
Sep 18, 2006
8,165
5,647
113
On the post game show one of the TV guys said that Coach B said that Reyna will be ready to go on Friday. We'll need him and we're going to need better defending and we're going to need Turner to have a great game.
We are going to need quite a bit more from everyone. Pulisic's set piece delivery sucked today. Need weston and yunus to play like 1st half versions of themselves over 75-80 minutes. Jedi and dest will need to step up defensively against saka and sterling. Zimmerman needs to sit. Ream is who he is... just avoid mistakes. Turner is going to need to be on his game and have better command of the defenders in front of him. Need sargent or wright to be in dangerous positions in the box more often. Weah needs to put enough pressure on Shaw to force him to sit back further. Adams was the only one who played well thru the whole game today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

SirPerceval

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2001
6,120
2,941
78
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
I am not even a casual fan - basically watch the World Cup for men and women and that’s about it. So from an outsiders view the most frustrating thing about that penalty call (which every soccer person I have heard today says was the right call) was the Wales player did not have possession and both players went for the ball at the same time.
 

RUevolution36

All-American
Sep 18, 2006
8,165
5,647
113
I am not even a casual fan - basically watch the World Cup for men and women and that’s about it. So from an outsiders view the most frustrating thing about that penalty call (which every soccer person I have heard today says was the right call) was the Wales player did not have possession and both players went for the ball at the same time.
You don't need to have possession to be fouled. Think of it like pass interference or defensive holding. Zimmerman went in with a dangerous challenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

JMORC2003

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2008
4,609
2,535
0
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
I agree with you on the PK. It is almost automatic, when I’ve seen fouls committed in the box that aren’t automatic goals. Hate to see a game won/lost (or tied) on what’s a judgement call by the ref.
 

CERU00

All-Conference
Feb 10, 2005
3,626
1,677
0
Soccer is a fundamentally flawed game. PK's should be eliminated except in the most, most , most. egregious cases . The reward is just too great for the penalty inflicted. Free kick, fine. Take a man off, fine. But the PK is an absolute sham. And to ultimately decide a tied game on PKs is a travesty.

Don't even get me started on the operatic flopping sh*t. I come from a soccer loving, soccer playing family. I'm the outlier. I've grown to hate the sport as its popularity increases. And I live in Portland, soccer town USA.
A dangerous tackle in the box is pretty egregious. It was a very very stupid play by Zimmerman. The pk could have easily been avoided. Take away penalty kicks and you'll see a lot more tackling and much fewer goals. That's not an outcome anyone wants.
Agree about the flopping... ref let that get out of control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Saudi Arabia up 2-1 in the 2nd half. Argentina scored a PK in the first half and had a couple goals called back on offsides.
 

Salvi's Headband

All-American
Oct 30, 2006
5,569
9,433
0
Yes a lot of ways this can play out. You also have the possibility of England playing backups last group match having 6 points/ clinched the group with an Iranian Wales tie, giving Wales a golden opportunity there to get a result. Not ideal to be playing England next but we made our bed.

England will lie down for their fellow country men if the opportunity presents itself. Don't doubt it.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,089
19,113
98
The penalty against the USA wasn’t a judgement call, it was a clear penalty, confirmed by VAR, video review. No controversy at all there. Just a poor play.

In the meantime, 80th minute and Saudi Arabia still up 2-1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cshelley

runner3383

Senior
Apr 30, 2015
1,197
898
78
A dangerous tackle in the box is pretty egregious. It was a very very stupid play by Zimmerman. The pk could have easily been avoided. Take away penalty kicks and you'll see a lot more tackling and much fewer goals. That's not an outcome anyone wants.
Agree about the flopping... ref let that get out of control.
What can be done about flops? These guys roll around like they lost a leg on the play. Really a huge turnoff for me to enjoy this sport.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,089
19,113
98
First half Argentina fell for offside trap after offside trap. Only a PK goal so far for them. I bet a lot of added time.
 

Lerxst72

Junior
Sep 1, 2016
410
355
63
I’m not an avid soccer follower, but I’ve NEVER seen these amounts of extra-time, as I’ve seen in this WC. I used to thing 4-5 minutes was long… this WC said, “hold my, beer”. (well…would have if they’d allowed it in the stadiums)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Joey Bags