OT: Big Layoffs at ESPN

Candiru

Senior
Jul 31, 2001
746
566
93
espn's perceived shift left is well known and is also well accepted in media circles as one reason for viewer loss. It's not THE reason for viewership declines but it is a reason, along with cord cutting, and it's not helping their situation. Their own ombudsman wrote a lengthy piece admitting the above points in December 2016. Examples of this are Caitlyn Jenner winning Arthur Ashe Award, televising an Obama town hall, pulling a golf tournament off of a Trump course due to past comments. John Skipper who runs the network says the filter they use as a company is tolerance not politics but that is tough to juggle when one side perceives you of being intolerant to their views. I'm not saying how I feel just that this real or perceived shift is well documented and has an impact externally.
 

MoobyCow

Heisman
Nov 28, 2001
26,944
26,363
0
Actually, the way this topic was presented on the Free Board made this very relevant from a Rutgers perspective...

How does this effect us going forward with new contracts?

Are we going to lose out just was we are becoming full members?

Some have said since live content is king we should be okay but others weren't so sure.

Wouldn't that be so "us" if that were the case? Lol

The revenue model for sports in general is an interesting topic. It would certainly appear that PPV is the way of the future, pay for the games you want to watch. However, only big schools will pull enough eyeballs for that to work, and they'll need someone else to play. So, how do you keep the rest of the teams alive in a PPV world?
 

MulletCork

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2012
2,630
3,153
113
Ed Werder announced that he was "laid off" after 17 years at ESPN covering the NFL. Pretty big name to let go.
 

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
220,821
109,711
63
Yikes some of you are in some serious denial if you don't think the way they deliver content or speak out on political issues (why would a sports network get political anyway?) is off putting. People don't watch sports programs to hear a journalism majors opinion on a social issue, they actually do it to get away from that nonsense. ESPN can't comprehend that and instead continuously doubles down on their stupidity. I look forward to watching them burn to the ground.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,814
83,355
113
Ed Werder announced that he was "laid off" after 17 years at ESPN covering the NFL. Pretty big name to let go.
Who?
Paul Kuharsky too. Who?

Not being snarky-just don't know who these folks are.
Chris Berman still there? I don't watch ESPN.
 

rutgersfan7

Senior
Dec 14, 2011
1,112
644
0
Yikes some of you are in some serious denial if you don't think the way they deliver content or speak out on political issues (why would a sports network get political anyway?) is off putting. People don't watch sports programs to hear a journalism majors opinion on a social issue, they actually do it to get away from that nonsense. ESPN can't comprehend that and instead continuously doubles down on their stupidity. I look forward to watching them burn to the ground.

Off putting and out of place ? Sure. But it's still not the main reason they are in trouble. Their contracts and overhead are too high and they read the market change and forecasts about as well I read Arabic. They are now scrambling to adjust with the layoffs over the past couple of years but they are still way behind. The only color they care about is green and if they thought a shift in how they present news would dramatically help profits, they would do it.

The scariest part is how this will impact ru as our tvs deals could suffer in this new market
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoobyCow

Beancounter88

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2010
3,490
2,340
0
So far, I've seen Ed Werder (NFL), Scott Burnside (NHL), Pierre LeBrun (NHL). That figures - fire the actual sports content people that built the network's core business
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,814
83,355
113
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigLou and IMARUFAN

MozRU

All-Conference
Oct 3, 2005
12,510
2,186
0
The roof
The roof

The roof is on fire

The roof
The roof

The roof is on fire

...we don't need no water, just let the.....
 

ScarletStateofNJ

All-Conference
Jul 6, 2011
3,176
2,588
0
Yes, I read that 100 on air employees are getting cut. ESPN is getting their content clocks cleaned by the NFL Network, The MLB network, The NHL network and the NBA network. I watch the NFL network and MLB network for highlights and game day reporting. Their on-air reporters are more tolerable and are more in-depth in their analysis. The only thing that ESPN does great is college football.

And that Michael and Jemele show at 6 pm, what the f is that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurichdog

Beancounter88

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2010
3,490
2,340
0
John Buccigross - one of few anchors I liked.

Significantly reduced roles:
Karl Ravitch
Ryan Russillo
Hannah Storm
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Who?
Paul Kuharsky too. Who?

Not being snarky-just don't know who these folks are.
Chris Berman still there? I don't watch ESPN.
I don't watch much ESPN these days but I've read articles talking about Berman giving up hosting duties of the draft and NFL countdown for other female anchors. Can't say for sure but sounds like a phasing out/retirement. He'll probably still be around but not in as large a capacity. I think he may do baseball, not sure.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,814
83,355
113
I don't watch much ESPN these days but I've read articles talking about Berman giving up hosting duties of the draft and NFL countdown for other female anchors. Can't say for sure but sounds like a phasing out/retirement. He'll probably still be around but not in as large a capacity. I think he may do baseball, not sure.
That baseball team they have of Boone?, Mendoza, and whoever is not so great, especially Mendoza. I know they have to push diversity, but can the find someone better like Beth Mowins?

Wonder if Beth survives.
Hope Jesse Palmer and Jason Pollock survive-they are two of the best on ESPN.
 

RBS05

All-Conference
Jan 15, 2004
6,058
3,019
0
Pretty much anyone hockey related is out. It didn't really make sense for them to spend money on talent with how little time they spend on the sport.
 

bwc2929

Senior
Jan 31, 2006
2,182
480
83
ESPN's downfall has nothing to do with whether they are left leaning or not. Their programming is terrible, not entertaining and they have over saturated their brand. If not for their live games they would be an even greater after thought. Also, the way people consume sport's news has changed.


The reason that ESPN is in trouble has nothing to do with their programming, hosts, Sports Center, ETC....... It has to do with the changes in cable TV..... It will never be like it use to be and ESPN is bleeding money because they aren't the only game in town now..... Cable subscribership's are way down and continue that way..... Stations like NETFLIX , Apple TV, HULU and others are the way to go now..... Plus you can watch everything on your phone with live streaming......The world is changing and new mediums are being used and old ones are slowly going away......So Left or Right politics have nothing to do with this
 

daneman100

All-Conference
Dec 5, 2003
5,185
3,313
0
Yikes some of you are in some serious denial if you don't think the way they deliver content or speak out on political issues (why would a sports network get political anyway?) is off putting. People don't watch sports programs to hear a journalism majors opinion on a social issue, they actually do it to get away from that nonsense. ESPN can't comprehend that and instead continuously doubles down on their stupidity. I look forward to watching them burn to the ground.

Exactly, sports are an escape from that crap. Just because you are on screen does not mean people want to hear your opinion.

I really do not remember the last time I had audio on from a sports broadcast. Announcing a game has really become a lost art.
 

RBS05

All-Conference
Jan 15, 2004
6,058
3,019
0
Beancounter, do you work for nj.com?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Had many good years, have many good friends at Star-Ledger/nj.com. But whoever came up with this idea is a scumbag. <a href="https://t.co/XViVBnBHak">https://t.co/XViVBnBHak</a></p>&mdash; Mike Vaccaro (@MikeVacc) <a href="">April 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

miketd1

Heisman
Sep 26, 2006
59,714
13,916
0
I stopped watching ESPN because I can get my sports highlights & updates faster (without annoying commercials!) in the blogosphere.

Other than exclusive broadcasting rights to certain live events, I can't name one thing ESPN is good for these days.

Not to mention their website layout -- woof...
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
About the politics angles.. I wonder if this will be a purge of all those not playing on the same side as management. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they kept their most political employees. I am a little surprised that Disney has not fixed this situation already. They are a first class operation in taking care of their customers.. but I guess ESPN has been such a cash cow that they have been given free reign.

But in the bigger scheme of things.. I think ESPN's agenda-pushing toward conferences with which they have the biggest deals is as much to blame as anything else. While I hated it way-back-when when The Big Ten was ABC/ESPN's biggest deal and they pushed the Big Ten to no end... and then they orchestrated their number 2 conference deal.. the ACC.. to get better in football by raiding the Big East over and over... NOW.. with the rise of competition from Fox and BTN (50% owned by Fox).. and even NBCsports to a lesser extent.. ESPN has actually gotten WORSE in pushing the SEC and ACC.

They used to be the only game in town for sports news.. and now there are so many options at the same time they have gone overboard in pushing their products and their political leanings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

masice520

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2015
2,189
3,525
113
I think you're seeing a wide trend of powerful media outlets are far left and believe if they push their agenda enough, the viewer will hop on board. However, a large amount of their viewers are either middle of the road or generally conservative and are really turned off by it.

You see it with Hollywood, you've seen it with this past election, you're seeing it sports. It's not a vast majority, but it's a large portion and I'd argue at least the majority by a bit.

This is a little out of the box, but you could make a decent argument that NASCAR tried to buy in to new-age sports to a degree and "progressiveness" to a degree , changing rules and technology etc...to try and appeal to that portion of society and while it seemed to work for a moment, they became bored with it and while that was all happening, "conservative" viewers that liked things the way they have been were lost. Now NASCAR ratings are in the absolute toilet as a result.
 

RUJohnny99

All-American
Nov 7, 2003
64,667
5,961
113
ESPN's downfall has nothing to do with whether they are left leaning or not. Their programming is terrible, not entertaining and they have over saturated their brand. If not for their live games they would be an even greater after thought. Also, the way people consume sport's news has changed.


The reason that ESPN is in trouble has nothing to do with their programming, hosts, Sports Center, ETC....... It has to do with the changes in cable TV..... It will never be like it use to be and ESPN is bleeding money because they aren't the only game in town now..... Cable subscribership's are way down and continue that way..... Stations like NETFLIX , Apple TV, HULU and others are the way to go now..... Plus you can watch everything on your phone with live streaming......The world is changing and new mediums are being used and old ones are slowly going away......So Left or Right politics have nothing to do with this
It's hand in hand. Espn over expanded, thinking $7 monthly carriage fees would last forever. Let's be honest, the only reason News, Classic, & U are around is to collect the carriage fee. Once the younger set started dropping cable, instead of cutting the profit centers (News, Classic & U), they think that by being "edgy" they'll bring those viewers back.

It's the same exact death spiral MTV took in the late 90s.
 

RBS05

All-Conference
Jan 15, 2004
6,058
3,019
0
I think you're seeing a wide trend of powerful media outlets are far left and believe if they push their agenda enough, the viewer will hop on board. However, a large amount of their viewers are either middle of the road or generally conservative and are really turned off by it.
Such BS. Cable prices are too high, viewers have many more (cheaper) options, ESPN spent too much money on rights fees, which all results in cutting costs.
 

Rutgers85_rivals

All-Conference
Jul 5, 2014
1,704
2,510
78
I saw a recent list of layoffs. I guess I'm old because I don't recognize most of them. I recognized Danny Kanell. I hope they get rid of Stephen A Smith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift