And quite often, they do not know what they are talking about...If anyone claims to be a climate change warrior and does not support nuclear, they do not know what they are talking about.
If anyone claims to be a conservationist or claims to care about preserving land, and does not support initiatives to severely reduce toxic pollution in waterways(creeks, streams, rivers, ponds, lakes) and improve air quality, they do not know what they are talking about.If anyone claims to be a climate change warrior and does not support nuclear, they do not know what they are talking about.
Sir, this is Six Pack Speak Dot ComPretty sure that between those two statements, there are a ton of people who do not know what they are talking about.
Sir, this is Six Pack Speak Dot Com
I don't trust Bill Gates to do anything for the good of the Country. Ever.
In MS we just have bigger unitsYes, Grand Gulf has the single biggest nuclear reactor/unit in the country in terms of MW output. There are lots of other sites that make more power than GGN though, because they have more than one unit.
So, is your last name "the Hoople?"
I'm far (far) from an expert on this, so others can argue about the best way to measure nuclear power plants... but from that most trustworthy of sources, wikipedia: Grand Gulf's reactor is the most powerful in the US and the 7th most powerful in the world, with a core power of 4408 MW"
There's obviously a huge difference between "core power" and the "nominal gross electrical output", which is the chart you showed. I'll explain the difference to you over a beer sometime. I'll just need a year or two to learn what that is myself first.
Three.. Fukushima.Just two little mishaps one in Ukraine and one in Pennsylvania and everyone ***** the bed. *** The USS Enterprise a nuclear power aircraft carrier sailed for 55 years. That's ship load of sailors over those years, and I have yet seen one walking around glowing.
Yep. Can still see the base of the cooling tower from the water. And it is located on the Tennessee Tombigbee waterway. Yellow creek is part of it.Is that site for the Yellow Creek Plant site in Tishomingo County still wasting away?
Was it the snail darter we saved there or was that the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway? Surely some ole bass-turd on the six-pack knows the answer.
Fukushima killed about 20 proposed reactors in the US.Three.. Fukushima.
It was the snail darter on the Tenn-Tom. Two of the leading protesters were profs at State. Dr. Clemmer taught biology and his wife taught English. I had class under both, Gotta confess I thought the were very nice people.......and still do.Is that site for the Yellow Creek Plant site in Tishomingo County still wasting away?
Was it the snail darter we saved there or was that the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway? Surely some ole bass-turd on the six-pack knows the answer.
Wind Turbines have killed more people than FukushimaFukushima killed about 20 proposed reactors in the US.
Spock seems a little affected tho, don't ya think ? Might just be his personality tho but those ears ?? Mutation.Just two little mishaps one in Ukraine and one in Pennsylvania and everyone ***** the bed. *** The USS Enterprise a nuclear power aircraft carrier sailed for 55 years. That's ship load of sailors over those years, and I have yet seen one walking around glowing.
That's exactly what I was thinking, most of these dummies around here just don't get it**Grand Gulf's output is limited by the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) because it is an older BWR (Boiling Water Reactor) plant. In a BWR, steam is taken directly from the core to turn the turbines (similar to Chernobyl), whereas the more common reactor type in the US, the PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor), uses heat exchangers to produce steam to turn the turbines. Additionally, GGNGS has a history of unplanned outages, which is a major safety concern in the eyes of the NRC. I've worked in that plant before and it is a total **** show.
Molten-salt reactors will likely be the future of nuclear energy in the U.S. They are built in a modular configuration, allowing components to be removed and replaced much more easily and quickly. I've also been told that when a molten-salt reactor is due for refueling, the core can be swapped out, and the refueling can be done offsite or the core it self is decommissioned.
Also, I read that somebody in the USA has built a 18 wheeler that runs on hydrogen. I remember some were opposed to hydrogen propulsion because it is so explosive.
Since you're the only one in this thread that seems to have a clue what you're talking about , what are the basic differences in GG and the plants we would build now (if we built any) ? ?Grand Gulf's output is limited by the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) because it is an older BWR (Boiling Water Reactor) plant. In a BWR, steam is taken directly from the core to turn the turbines (similar to Chernobyl), whereas the more common reactor type in the US, the PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor), uses heat exchangers to produce steam to turn the turbines. Additionally, GGNGS has a history of unplanned outages, which is a major safety concern in the eyes of the NRC. I've worked in that plant before and it is a total **** show.
Molten-salt reactors will likely be the future of nuclear energy in the U.S. They are built in a modular configuration, allowing components to be removed and replaced much more easily and quickly. I've also been told that when a molten-salt reactor is due for refueling, the core can be swapped out, and the refueling can be done offsite or the core it self is decommissioned.
Best part about W was Dana Carvey and will ferrellIn hindsight, some of us were kind of mean to W about how he said nuclear. What sweet, sweet summer children we were...
That’s what she said.In MS we just have bigger units
But it did turn them all gay, never mind that's just the navy nothing to do with nuclear.The USS Enterprise a nuclear power aircraft carrier sailed for 55 years. That's ship load of sailors over those years, and I have yet seen one walking around glowing.
If MS is buying all the power I’d say it says more about the energy demand to generate crypto and Al3 Mile Island is re-opening. I'd say that's a good indicator that the narrative has finally changed on nuclear. All it took was people hating the landscape being filled with solar and wind farms apparently.
Since you're the only one in this thread that seems to have a clue what you're talking about , what are the basic differences in GG and the plants we would build now (if we built any) ? ?
You're claiming that something Entergy is in charge of is a **** show? I shall not believe it. I just shall not believe it.**Grand Gulf's output is limited by the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) because it is an older BWR (Boiling Water Reactor) plant. In a BWR, steam is taken directly from the core to turn the turbines (similar to Chernobyl), whereas the more common reactor type in the US, the PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor), uses heat exchangers to produce steam to turn the turbines. Additionally, GGNGS has a history of unplanned outages, which is a major safety concern in the eyes of the NRC. I've worked in that plant before and it is a total **** show.
Molten-salt reactors will likely be the future of nuclear energy in the U.S. They are built in a modular configuration, allowing components to be removed and replaced much more easily and quickly. I've also been told that when a molten-salt reactor is due for refueling, the core can be swapped out, and the refueling can be done offsite or the core it self is decommissioned.
I used to work for Entergy back in the 1990s when the Dilbert comic strip was first getting popular. We used to swear Scott Adams had to work for Entergy. Turned out he worked at Pacific Gas & Electric. So I just assume all power companies are filled with corporate speaking bureaucrats.You're claiming that something Entergy is in charge of is a **** show? I shall not believe it. I just shall not believe it.**
Look *** hole, the navy does not turn people gay. The 10% that enter straight, leave straight.*But it did turn them all gay, never mind that's just the navy nothing to do with nuclear.
For you easily offended that was a joke......kind of....
I don't think it's just power companies. Somewhere (I think in one of his books), he wrote that early on he kept making more and more ridiculous work situations with dumber and dumber decisions by executives, and no matter how asinine and unrealistic he thought he made them, people would write and tell him he exactly described something at their work.I used to work for Entergy back in the 1990s when the Dilbert comic strip was first getting popular. We used to swear Scott Adams had to work for Entergy. Turned out he worked at Pacific Gas & Electric. So I just assume all power companies are filled with corporate speaking bureaucrats.
I know he could have pulled off this hoax at Entergy when I was there. Probably thousands of other big companies too.I don't think it's just power companies. Somewhere (I think in one of his books), he wrote that early on he kept making more and more ridiculous work situations with dumber and dumber decisions by executives, and no matter how asinine and unrealistic he thought he made them, people would write and tell him he exactly described something at their work.
Fukushima is often forgotten, and it would check in at #2Just two little mishaps one in Ukraine and one in Pennsylvania and everyone ***** the bed. *** The USS Enterprise a nuclear power aircraft carrier sailed for 55 years. That's ship load of sailors over those years, and I have yet seen one walking around glowing.
Yes, Grand Gulf has the single biggest nuclear reactor/unit in the country in terms of MW output. There are lots of other sites that make more power than GGN though, because they have more than one unit.