OT: maybe there is a growing appetite for nuclear energy

Dawghouse

Senior
Sep 14, 2011
1,132
959
113
I don't expect us to ever build massive reactors again. Maybe but the red tape will be astronomical.

Future seems to be in those small modular systems. Seems we've been using them in subs for decades without incident.
 

Walkthedawg

All-Conference
Oct 3, 2022
979
1,755
93
It was the snail darter on the Tenn-Tom. Two of the leading protesters were profs at State. Dr. Clemmer taught biology and his wife taught English. I had class under both, Gotta confess I thought the were very nice people.......and still do.
And the kicker to that now…. The snail darter is no longer listed as endangered because of higher populations in other areas. So a nuke plant up there running then and now would have had no overall effect.
 

maroonmadman

Senior
Nov 7, 2010
2,530
853
113
The problem with Grand Gulf is its uptime and its availability to generate power at full output. GGNP has had more unscheduled downtime than pretty much any other nuke plant in the US.

https://www.eenews.net/articles/downtime-at-aging-grand-gulf-attracts-increased-scrutiny/

Simply put, if it ain't online generating power then it's offline and costing money. Downtime doesn't pay and GGNP has a lot of downtime.

Also, one of my family members is a corporate pilot for Entergy, he flies around members of Entergy's 7 figure paycheck club. They have recently purchased a few new jets. Jets that can go coast to coast without refueling. There is talk of "mini nukes" that could produce power for a city. I think some of this is related to sodium core reactors but we shall see.

Nuclear power is fine and dandy but it also has to be done right. This is one Genie that can't be let out of its bottle. A good portion of people in the US are pro nuclear power but nobody wants one (nuke plant) in their backyard nor do they want said produced waste in their backyard. That's the conundrum we find ourselves in.