hooptydawg said:Surely not. That would be embarrassing.
Personally not against it, know her well.........this makes no sense if you know what she now does and how her position is funded....FreeDawg said:Amy Tuck
I may have missed the discussion but has anyone heard this? Pretty common knowledge?
odddawg said:Personally not against it, know her well.........this makes no sense if you know what she now does and how her position is funded....FreeDawg said:Amy Tuck
I may have missed the discussion but has anyone heard this? Pretty common knowledge?
Shmuley said:since she was at least 0-3 on bar exams.
I find this an interesting development if it is true...by-the-way, another board mentioned it today..must be something there...<div>Many on here are way "smarter" than I on the "inside" stories at MSU, so I read a lot but rarely post....can't help myself on this one though....</div><div>I can't see her being able to do any more as a VP (thought the no terminal degree makes this unlikely IMHO, especially in today's environment in MSU Administration) than she can do now. In fact, I've been told there are political/legislative reasons Keenum doesn't want or need her to be more publicly involved with that process. Better to have her behind the scenes. Not saying they are valid...I think if I were in his shoes, I'd sack-up and tell some folks to get over it. Much as some may think otherwise, she is a good advocate and pretty dang effective at certain efforts. I'd rather have her on our side than opposite. But, that's just me...</div><div>Shmuley said:someone, apparently Keenum (or someone or some people with influence close to him), think she will be useful at the legislature.