I would not have been happy to tie up 40+ million in Tucker. Yes, Stearns put us in a place we we really did need him but we never should have been in this position. I understand that Stearns has a mission he made clear- run prevention...And he did go out and get one aging elite fielder. So, we did actually upgrade 2B at roughly double the price of who he replaced.
But let's see how we are doing elsewhere - C - no change and not a game changer for run prevention. 1B - Sure, Pete lost some range but was elite scooping throws. But at least we have this covered but one guy who really sucks in his 17 games at 1B and another who has a total of 1 inning at the position. 2B- clear upgrade, 3B - No change, SS- No change but still elite, RF- no change and clearly not a run preventor, CF - we either have an elite fielder who can't hit and is not a full time player or a rookie, LF - well, maybe just not having anyone there at all is better than Nimmo...
So- I do see Stearns vision being clearly successful in the field. So, I am ok losing so much offense. The good thing is that we clearing got better in the bullpen with run prevention to bring in a closer with a +4 era to replace a horrible closer with a sub 2 era.
And Stearns pitching lab has been so successful- the starters who couldt last 4 innings last year, will clearly be so much better. There was no need to make an upgrade there.
But heck- the lambs love the man for what he did at Milwaukee(who never won the WS with Stearns) and how Stearns has given us a world class minor league system. OK- except that most of the players that are considered elite, were here before Stearns.
Good thing we can count on him making all the right moves at the trade deadline.
I am excited, And the Wilpon's only wish they had hired him sooner. Oh wait, I forgot, the Wilpons no longer own us- I heard a rumor that one of the richest me in the world bought the team and will spend money to make us a winner.