OT: NYC tolls

RU4Real

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,955
30,733
0
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.
 

hankee18

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
4,013
7,180
113
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.

It's not about revenue, huh?
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,256
0
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.
If you think it's only about reducing volume and nothing to due with $ you're proven yourself to be one sided / indoctrinated . Even the MTA says it needs the congestion "taxes" to update and support public transportation systems.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,256
0
And by the way NYC and other large cities don’t need another reason for people to work from home-- it's killing them now. The significant reduction it taxes from only 48% of people now coming back to the city only means huge reduction in services etc. Don't be so narrow minded to think the city's demise won't have a negative consequences for its suburbs.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,129
18,478
113
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.

Bull. It's about raising revenue from nonresidents who can't vote in NY elections
 

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
35,779
45,412
112
Revenue is not the primary driver for congestion pricing.

Given the choice of infinite traffic = infinite revenue and zero traffic = zero revenue, the goal of congestion pricing is to drive the curve toward the latter.
They need to fix the subways and make it safe if they want more people taking them
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
Whatever the congestion pricing toll ends up being, Suffolk County should charge that much for these NYC fools congesting up Montauk Highway all summer long.
Was in the Hamptons this weekend.

Not as bad as it has been but I was usually (luckily - lol) going the other direction. The Belt, Southern State and the Sunrise were not fun on a Friday afternoon after Memorial Day.

But yeah, that stretch from Southhampton to Hampton Bays/East Quogue was brutal. Brother in law said it’s that bad every day.
 
Last edited:

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,256
0
Less congestion and less polution and more revenue.
More revenue from all the empty office towers and closed small businesses that used to serve the people in them?? As usual the unintended consequences from those with no common sense will hurt people and cities. Read the study just released from the Stern business school at Nyu about the dire consequences of people not coming into the city and working from home. Even those in their suburban bubbles will be hurt. Congestion pricing will fail but it will be too late to correct as usual the dumb mistakes made by those that have agendas.
 

Morrischiano2

All-American
Dec 3, 2019
5,956
7,718
0
More revenue from all the empty office towers and closed small businesses that used to serve the people in them?? As usual the unintended consequences from those with no common sense will hurt people and cities. Read the study just released from the Stern business school at Nyu about the dire consequences of people not coming into the city and working from home. Even those in their suburban bubbles will be hurt. Congestion pricing will fail but it will be too late to correct as usual the dumb mistakes made by those that have agendas.
Employers are slowly forcing the end of WFH. I work downtown by the WTC and last summer we had to come in at least once a week. Starting June 1, we have to come in Monday, Tuesday and one other day of the week. A majority of financial services firms in NYC have folks coming in 4 days a week. I anticipate that my firm will adopt the same policy next year.

If you run a company in the city and your competitors are having their employees come in 3-4 days a week, are you going to allow employees to WFH, as you stare at your empty office that you pay high leases for?

The point is that people are slowly coming back. Will companies look to scale back some office space in the future? Probably but office occupancies will rise from the current 50% that NYC is at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,256
0
Employers are slowly forcing the end of WFH. I work downtown by the WTC and last summer we had to come in at least once a week. Starting June 1, we have to come in Monday, Tuesday and one other day of the week. A majority of financial services firms in NYC have folks coming in 4 days a week. I anticipate that my firm will adopt the same policy next year.

If you run a company in the city and your competitors are having their employees come in 3-4 days a week, are you going to allow employees to WFH, as you stare at your empty office that you pay high leases for?

The point is that people are slowly coming back. Will companies look to scale back some office space in the future? Probably but office occupancies will rise from the current 50% that NYC is at.
Not what the study shows-- read it .The 2022 48% number isn't sustainable and the numbers for 2023 have not improved. Personally I beleive strongly that people , especially young ones, should embrace going back to the office for career reasons but it's not happening. Read the studies and the facts.By the way 3 days a week in town doesn't cut it either Those bank funded office towers are being unleased and may mean doom for the banking industry due to mortgages they hold.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
I just went to pick up my mother from surgical rehab in Long Island and bring her home. Cost of tolls:

NJTP 7a-18: $13.80
GWB: $13.75
Throgs Neck Bridge: $6.55
* Verrazano Bridge: $6.55
Gothels Bridge: $12.75
NJTP 13-7a: $6.65

Total price of tolls: $60.05

it's INSANE
* That one is pretty good.

Thought it was higher.

The Port Authority rates are way too high IMO.
 
Sep 27, 2006
20,274
23,340
0
* That one is pretty good.

Thought it was higher.

The Port Authority rates are way too high IMO.

Verrazano charges both ways now. So it's actually $13.10 round trip, although I only went on it once because I needed to do the GWB to get to the side of LI my mother was on and came back home from the other side.


and, I forgot to add, my toll prices were with EZ Pass discounts. It would be considerably more without EZPass
 
  • Wow
Reactions: redking

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,654
15,628
113
I just went to pick up my mother from surgical rehab in Long Island and bring her home. Cost of tolls:

NJTP 7a-18: $13.80
GWB: $13.75
Throgs Neck Bridge: $6.55
Verrazano Bridge: $6.55
Gothels Bridge: $12.75
NJTP 13-7a: $6.65

Total price of tolls: $60.05

it's INSANE
wow, insane is right
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
85,793
83,342
113
More revenue from all the empty office towers and closed small businesses that used to serve the people in them?? As usual the unintended consequences from those with no common sense will hurt people and cities. Read the study just released from the Stern business school at Nyu about the dire consequences of people not coming into the city and working from home. Even those in their suburban bubbles will be hurt. Congestion pricing will fail but it will be too late to correct as usual the dumb mistakes made by those that have agendas.
The laptop job people think this is great. They live in a bubble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU2131 and redking

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
43,270
13,309
93
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.
It’s all about the money
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

rurichdog

Heisman
Sep 30, 2006
116,807
14,389
0
* That one is pretty good.

Thought it was higher.

The Port Authority rates are way too high IMO.
Up until a couple years ago, it was $19.00 paid only westbound. Then it became $9.50 both directions, and now MTA is obfuscating with rebates depending on what service center you get your EZPass subscription through.
 

DanRU

Senior
Jun 9, 2008
254
414
63
Congestion pricing isn't about revenue, it's 100% about reducing volume. During Covid it was easier to drive into lower Manhattan than to take public transportation because nobody was on the roads. As things have normalized, public transportation ridership remains ~40% below pre-pandemic levels while surface street traffic is up.
If you said it was partially to reduce volume and improve air quality, you may be correct but 100%? I think it's 100% about revenue since they're looking to make up losses due to reductions in subway / bus fare and bridge tolls. All politicians want to keep the revenue coming so they can keep spending.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
46,439
56,353
113
If you said it was partially to reduce volume and improve air quality, you may be correct but 100%? I think it's 100% about revenue since they're looking to make up losses due to reductions in subway / bus fare and bridge tolls. All politicians want to keep the revenue coming so they can keep spending.

To add onto this, NYC is the worst when it comes to corruption and mismanagement of public funds. I believe I read a while back that the cost per mile of track in the NYC area is the highest in the world. And there was an article a couple of years ago about the thousands of no show jobs that existed on public works projects in NYC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138

voltz99

Junior
Sep 25, 2015
378
248
0
DRPA spends half their budget on debt for all the pork projects they funded. Sports stadiums, museums and so on. The politicians use the rolls as their personal piggy bank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru1869

voltz99

Junior
Sep 25, 2015
378
248
0
To add onto this, NYC is the worst when it comes to corruption and mismanagement of public funds. I believe I read a while back that the cost per mile of track in the NYC area is the highest in the world. And there was an article a couple of years ago about the thousands of no show jobs that existed on public works projects in NYC.
NJ has the most expensive roads per mile in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,686
0
The politicians use the rolls as their personal piggy bank.

Money Laundering could be core of business curriculum.
A huge % of Ukraine Aid never even leaves the US (goes to defense producers and back to DC) .