OT: PAC/ACC merger?

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,645
35,971
113
The only threat to the B1G attempting to control the west coast is the B12, but how much of a threat are they? Those moves are secondary to screwing over the SEC while destroying the ACC. The idea is to keep the SEC bottled up in the south while removing the ACC from the big boy table. Once that's done, the B1G turns its attention back west, where several hungry teams will do pretty much anything the B1G ask of them.
you should stop posting
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I'm thinking ND when the ACC GOR expires.
I believe though they are not a football member they are contractual obligated to play 5 football games against ACC teams every year until the ACC GOR expires, That is because they agreed to playing those games when they put their other sports programs in the ACC..
So the B1G will go after the west coast, then when the ACC's GOR is up
raid that conference for some of it's regular members to shore up eastern and southern section and add Notre Dame to the B1G Midwest section.
You assume ND will join when the ACC GOR expires.

I’ve thought that as possible since Texas/OU left the B12 and that going national should be the B10’s response. Go national and have many of their rivals in conference and wreck their current home a bit and then you have a good shot as you’ll get at ND. However, I’ve never taken that as a given just possible.
I don’t think money will ever be an issue for them. CFP access likely won’t be either. I think a home for its other sports is one possible issue for them. The other is scheduling in general if conferences ever increase the number of intraconference games they play. So it depends on what ND leadership thinks is a suitable enough home for their other sports. Will leftovers of the ACC or the B12 be good enough or not? I don’t know.

I think a lot would depend on whether the SEC joined in and took any ACC teams. If they don’t, I think ND could stay with the 12 leftovers. If they do then the 10 or less leftovers might not be as attractive. Maybe the SEC doesn’t join in an ACC raid just to lessen the probability of ND coming to the B10. So in my mind, the B10 can increase its chances but it’s still not a given.

If ND comes on board then I think you can go to 22 or 24. If they don’t, then I think stopping at 20 is okay and having 4 in the west, 5 in the east and the rest in the middle. You could have 4 divisions of 5. Nebraska might have to be grouped with the west and then you can have conference semifinals too for more valuable inventory.

If it’s too much for any one team, maybe you could even rotate annually the team from a specific group that rotates as part of the west.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MADHAT1

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,664
15,629
113
You assume ND will join when the ACC GOR expires.

I’ve thought that as possible since Texas/OU left the B12 and that going national should be the B10’s response. Go national and have many of their rivals in conference and wreck their current home a bit and then you have a good shot as you’ll get at ND. However, I’ve never taken that as a given just possible.
I don’t think money will ever be an issue for them. CFP access likely won’t be either. I think a home for its other sports is one possible issue for them. The other is scheduling in general if conferences ever increase the number of intraconference games they play. So it depends on what ND leadership thinks is a suitable enough home for their other sports. Will leftovers of the ACC or the B12 be good enough or not? I don’t know.

I think a lot would depend on whether the SEC joined in and took any ACC teams. If they don’t, I think ND could stay with the 12 leftovers. If they do then the 10 or less leftovers might not be as attractive. Maybe the SEC doesn’t join in an ACC raid just to lessen the probability of ND coming to the B10. So in my mind, the B10 can increase its chances but it’s still not a given.

If ND comes on board then I think you can go to 22 or 24. If they don’t, then I think stopping at 20 is okay and having 4 in the west, 5 in the east and the rest in the middle. You could have 4 divisions of 5. Nebraska might have to be grouped with the west and then you can have conference semifinals too for more valuable inventory.

If it’s too much for any one team, maybe you could even rotate annually the team from a specific group that rotates as part of the west.
Just me speculating .without anything to back up my opinion

I really don't see expansion ending until there are only 2 top powers .
Conferences limiting their numbers when there are still quality programs to poach and be the #1 is something I don't see.
Getting the biggest deal is what I see the B1G and SEC trying to do for bragging rights and control of the college sports world . or at least be considered the best of all and paid like it.

As for Notre Dame, like you I feel they value their independence in football and consider that a major part of having a national fan-base and won't be giving that up unless forced to because they'd lose too much money by being an independent.
I feel they are locked into the ACC until 2036 and when that year is reached the B1G will go hell-bent for leather after them.
But the B1G knows getting them won't be easy so ot will take over the West Coast first , keep control of the midwest, then fight the SEC for the south by adding ACC schools to it's eastern presence and have a east/south division
with or without ND joining it's MidWest programs.
The number of ACC programs the B1G poaches will be one more if ND stays independant and puts it other programs in the Big East or 1 less if ND goes B1G.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
IMO, just a matter of time for Arizona and probably the other 2 as well. The lack of exposure (even if there was some sublicensing deal) is probably a bridge too far.

 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
I hope its both AZ schools and Utah that go to the Big 12 because I want to laugh at UConn being shut out of a major conference yet again.
I think the ACC (who will likely still have playoff access) could be in their future down the line.

Everyone looks down at the conferences that aren't the B10 and SEC. I don't think they should so much. Yes they will be far behind in money but money is just a means to an end. The end being accomplishments, hopefully big ones, on the court/field.

UConn just won the NCAA tourney, Villanova did too. The BE and other smaller conferences have teams that make the tourney, have runs in the tourney, get ranked (sometimes very high) and win championships. They don't get the same money as the B10 and SEC.

Outside of championships, I think the rest is possible in football for teams from the PAC, B12, ACC in the future as long as they have playoff access and I think they will. So I think that's plenty good for the teams that end up remaining in those conferences. Money might not be good but opportunity will be.

We've seen it in a 4 team playoff with Cincy and TCU. We can certainly see similar results in a 12 team playoff, and maybe even 16 down the line.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
I think the ACC (who will likely still have playoff access) could be in their future down the line.

Everyone looks down at the conferences that aren't the B10 and SEC. I don't think they should so much. Yes they will be far behind in money but money is just a means to an end. The end being accomplishments, hopefully big ones, on the court/field.

UConn just won the NCAA tourney, Villanova did too. The BE and other smaller conferences have teams that make the tourney, have runs in the tourney, get ranked (sometimes very high) and win championships. They don't get the same money as the B10 and SEC.

Outside of championships, I think the rest is possible for teams from the PAC, B12, ACC in the future as long as they have playoff access and I think they will. So I think that's plenty good for the teams that end up remaining in those conferences. Money might not be good but opportunity will be.

We've seen it in a 4 team playoff with Cincy and TCU. We can certainly see similar results in a 12 team playoff, and maybe even 16 down the line.
In terms of competitiveness, it would be an advantage for UConn to get into a “lesser” power conference because the revenue disparity coming in wouldn’t be so stark.

We know all too well how hard it is to compete when you move from BE/AAC level facilities and competition to a conference where money is no object to many schools.
 
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
In terms of competitiveness, it would be an advantage for UConn to get into a “lesser” power conference because the revenue disparity coming in wouldn’t be so stark.

We know all too well how hard it is to compete when you move from BE/AAC level facilities and competition to a conference where money is no object to many schools.
Yea, the big reason for money is to achieve things, hopefully big things. So IMO teams from conferences not named the SEC/B10 can still achieve goals, including big ones.

The bulk of the competition is in conference against teams with similar resources so it's not so much of a handicap not getting the big tv money.

If you have access to the playoffs you can still achieve big goals. Outside of a championship in football, anything else is possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Dec 17, 2008
45,215
16,775
0
Forth Worth Star columnist. Maybe not as reliable as mainstream CFB media but it seems plausible after yesterday's Apple streaming news.