The water didn't seem to be a factor in the PKs. The striker just had to make sure he had solid footing while placing the ball. One of the 4 missed PKs hit the crossbar, and the others were stopped by the goalies.How much did the water on the field impact the PKs? That's a lot of missed PKs - if I count right, overall they made 5 and missed 4.
According to the Twitter account @RUMensSoccer, RU tied the game at 1-1 in the 76th minute....
How many minutes left when we tied it?...
That game was played under awful conditions. There weren't just puddles across the field, there were small lakes.
Glad RU was able to pull out a win.
Sigh...someday...
Surprised they won once down and in that slop.
As I said yesterday, in response to you IIRC on the other board, the more skilled, better coached team, wins games in lousy weather much more often than not.
I have to disagree with ya. Soccer isn't that much different from football in the way weather can play a major role. Just as heavy rain and wind can take away the long passing game in football, moving through the giant puddles like these slows down the faster team, makes long, creative passes more difficult, and takes away simple plays (like the tap in or two goals that RU would have had in better conditions).
You always hope the more skilled and better coached teams wins. I just don't think that's always the case in awful field conditions -- especially if the lesser team gets a goal in the first half.
The game is Akron although SK.com says Piscataway. Women could be home on Sunday if they beat Hofstra tonight. Would be playing the winner of ND/UConn who are playing on Yurcak right now. Two games on the field tonight after last night? I think I would have rather played in the first game.Is the game home or in Akrin?
I would bet dollars-to-donuts that bad weather has effected far fewer games (W/L, not spread, or even being competitive) than most people want to think it has, and that, typically, the better team wins.