Any questions:Ohtani is doing both at the same time. He's the best player in the history of the game.
Wasn’t last year the first time in a long time that no black players were on either team in the World Series?The high majority of best black athletes today are playing football or basketball, so Ohtani isn’t playing against the best of the black athletes either.
The rest of the world wasn’t playing much baseball back when Ruth played, so what was in the USA was it.
Would’ve loved to see Ruth hit sliders and changeups that are faster today than the fastballs back in the 20s.There is no doubt that Ohtani is the better athlete. He would kick Ruth's *** in a decathlon competition. The question is who is the better baseball player. Ruth dominated his era as no player has before or since.
SIAP -- Whitey Ford first broke Ruth's record in 1960-1961.Until (I believe) Orel Hershisher broke it, didn’t Babe Ruth have the longest scoreless streak in World Series play as a pitcher?
This will always be an unfair comparisonTo me, nevermind comparing to Ohtani, 1927 Ruth isn’t even an MLB level player today. Completely different level of competition and fitness.
However, we have to judge greatness relative to the era. He was far more dominant in his era, more dominant than anyone in any major sport in his era except maybe Gretzky.
Would’ve loved to see Ruth hit sliders and changeups that are faster today than the fastballs back in the 20s.
Sure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.This will always be an unfair comparison
You would have to figure that Ruth would have followed current physical training if he played today, and Ohtani would have not worked out as he has, had he played back then
I agree that all previous greats would not be as good if playing today unless they adhered to today's workout and prep standardsSure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.
If Ruth was playing today, he would have been born at a time where human men are 2-3 inches taller, much larger and stronger (i.e., he would be like current modern day athletes).Sure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.
Or see how Ruth would’ve done vs Joe Rogan, Martin Dihigo, Rube Foster, among other Negro League HOFers.Would love to see players today try and play with an antiquated baseball, no body protection at the plate, different bats, no nutrition or training programs, etc.
The only way to measure players is against their era.
I made no comment about Ohtani’s physique. That said, I could post a picture of Arnold at 27, wouldn’t mean he would have been a better ball player than a major leaguer.Ohtani at 27 next to Trout.
![]()
GO RU
Ohtani hasn’t dominated current times for a full season yet, so do you still want to stick by this speculative statement to compare 100 years ago?Consider it this way - Ruth today would be a good ball player. Ohtani would have been just as dominant 100 years ago.
Find it interesting that the only insults (whether directed at Ruth or other fans) cast in this thread are by those that favor Ohtani.Ruth was playing against plumbers and roofers. The level of play is vastly better today than it was 100 years ago. We all love Ruth. His feats were incredible. He might even be an all-star today. Or more likely, he'd be just another fat reliever.
Exactly. Ruth played all three outfield positions as well as a little first base. Ohtani would have played once a week in Ruth's day.+1 I'd like to see a few more years at this pace before I make that call. Of course, what would Ruth's pitching career have been if there had been DH back then?
109…that sort of supports my opinion. Without today’s medicine, training, etc and take him as is from 1927, he would not be good enough to play in the majors.
Doctor, not exaggerating. I don’t think any 1927 player beamed to 2023 would make a roster.
2023 Vogelbach is an all-star hitting 80 mph fastballs in the 1927 game.
I’m not saying that with modern development regimens and medical care Ruth wouldn’t be good.
+1Well you kind of have to take everything into consideration in my opinion. No one trained in the 20's but today they do, so you'd have to assume Ruth would also. Also if you put Ohtani into the game in the 20's and 30's his arm might fall all after 3 or 4 seasons of pitching 250 to 300 innings.
Ohtani is hitting HR’s in tiny stadiums. Both are impressive but Ruth is still the goat.
Get back to me when he actually plays in a playoff game let alone win a World Series
Find it interesting that the only insults (whether directed at Ruth or other fans) cast in this thread are by those that favor Ohtani.
Yeah they're bigger etc, but they're lousy baseball players. No fundamentals or baseball skills. Don't know how to run the bases, slide, beat a tag. Don't know how to field a grounder or throw the ball straight if they do manage to field it. Don't know how to go after a fly ball or pop up & can't throw the ball straight from the outfield, not to mention hit the cut off man. Try to uppercut everything & pull off the ball as well, not to mention not running hard out of the box if they do hit the ball. And oh yeah, they don't hit it that much. And of course they can't bunt. Pitchers can't go more than six innings. All of the above is why the game stinks.Athletes get better every generation
That is not to say that great players of the past would not be great players today but overall speed, strength and size progresses each generation
I believe Zappa has posted about the number of pitchers throwing in the 100s in comparison to when he played.
I agree. I did say right off the bat (pun intended) that Ruth was a more dominant player in his time than Ohtani is today.I agree that all previous greats would not be as good if playing today unless they adhered to today's workout and prep standards
My point is that comparing Different generations of players is useless. No one knows how good any of the old timers would be now because they never went through today's processes
Anyone who says otherwise is speculating
Whatever the top WWI fighter plane was in its day (maybe what von Richthofen flew ?) it would get destroyed by any modern fighter jet in seconds and before the WWI pilot became aware of the enemy.
That has to be one of the worst analogies I've ever heard.
it perfectly explains my point in a simple way most people can comprehend. but not all, sadly. Planes or people or anything, you cant compare performance across different times unless by comparing to others in the same era.That has to be one of the worst analogies I've ever heard.
Did they start letting cyborgs play MLB?
And let's remember, Babe Ruth got screwed out of a lot of HRs due to an old BS rule:I completely forgot about that. They had some cavernous stadiums back then.
Wins are so overrated. Much better when everybody gets a participation trophy.
I noticed that too.
he played 5yrs (seasons) against negro league teams and dominatedBoth Babe Ruth and Ohtani are great players but I believe Ohtani is the greatest player of all time. Babe Ruth played between 1914-1935 almost ten years before any black players could play in the MLB. A major baseball league with all white players without players like Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, and Ken Griffey. The league at that time didn’t have the best pitchers or hitters available. Baseball now searches the world for the best players and the training is more extensive, players in general now are better than in the past. In addition, I believe Ruth was in “murderer row“ and saw more pitches than Ohtani.
best post hereComparing players across eras is not workable -- too much has changed in the century between Ruth and Ohtani. All one can say is that Ruth was unique in his era -- more so, I think than Ohtani is in his.
Good point. To suggest a guy wasn't talented because he held another job is just ignorant.Haters: Babe Ruth hit mph fastballs thrown by white plumbers.
Counter argument: Why didn't everyone hit 700 HRs then?