OT: Ruth vs Ohtani

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
Ruth wouldn’t even make the MLB in these days. People saying he’d hit 80 homers lmaoooo
 

T2Kplus20

Heisman
May 1, 2007
30,444
18,430
113
Ohtani is doing both at the same time. He's the best player in the history of the game.
Any questions:

Did Babe Ruth out homered every American League team in 1920?
Ruth finished the year with 54 home runs, an 86 percent increase from his record-setting 1919 total of 29. Ruth out-homered every other team in the American League, the first time that had ever happened (and one of two times, along with 1927, that Ruth would accomplish the feat. No one else has ever done it.)

Ohtani isn't a patch on Ruth's fanny.
 

24Babybull

Senior
Oct 15, 2006
1,018
413
83
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
I forget how old @beaced is and don’t know if he’s a baseball fan, but it might be interesting to get his thoughts on Ruth vs. Ohtani
 
Oct 19, 2010
207,474
28,753
0
Ruth was playing against plumbers and roofers. The level of play is vastly better today than it was 100 years ago. We all love Ruth. His feats were incredible. He might even be an all-star today. Or more likely, he'd be just another fat reliever.
 

24Babybull

Senior
Oct 15, 2006
1,018
413
83
99% of the Ruth footage was taken in the last few years of his career - so in his prime he was not fat. If you don't know that - there is no reason to speak to you anymore.
 

hoquat63

All-Conference
Mar 17, 2005
9,129
4,421
0
The high majority of best black athletes today are playing football or basketball, so Ohtani isn’t playing against the best of the black athletes either.

The rest of the world wasn’t playing much baseball back when Ruth played, so what was in the USA was it.
Wasn’t last year the first time in a long time that no black players were on either team in the World Series?
 

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
43,272
13,309
93
There is no doubt that Ohtani is the better athlete. He would kick Ruth's *** in a decathlon competition. The question is who is the better baseball player. Ruth dominated his era as no player has before or since.
Would’ve loved to see Ruth hit sliders and changeups that are faster today than the fastballs back in the 20s.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,172
24,797
113
To me, nevermind comparing to Ohtani, 1927 Ruth isn’t even an MLB level player today. Completely different level of competition and fitness.

However, we have to judge greatness relative to the era. He was far more dominant in his era, more dominant than anyone in any major sport in his era except maybe Gretzky.
This will always be an unfair comparison

You would have to figure that Ruth would have followed current physical training if he played today, and Ohtani would have not worked out as he has, had he played back then
 

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,074
6,312
113
Would’ve loved to see Ruth hit sliders and changeups that are faster today than the fastballs back in the 20s.

Would love to see players today try and play with an antiquated baseball, no body protection at the plate, different bats, no nutrition or training programs, etc.

The only way to measure players is against their era.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,902
4,365
66
This will always be an unfair comparison

You would have to figure that Ruth would have followed current physical training if he played today, and Ohtani would have not worked out as he has, had he played back then
Sure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,172
24,797
113
Sure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.
I agree that all previous greats would not be as good if playing today unless they adhered to today's workout and prep standards

My point is that comparing Different generations of players is useless. No one knows how good any of the old timers would be now because they never went through today's processes

Anyone who says otherwise is speculating
 

T2Kplus20

Heisman
May 1, 2007
30,444
18,430
113
Sure. Am only saying that 1927 Ruth would not be a major leaguer today. Not commenting on Ruth with today’s training.
If Ruth was playing today, he would have been born at a time where human men are 2-3 inches taller, much larger and stronger (i.e., he would be like current modern day athletes).
 

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
43,272
13,309
93
Would love to see players today try and play with an antiquated baseball, no body protection at the plate, different bats, no nutrition or training programs, etc.

The only way to measure players is against their era.
Or see how Ruth would’ve done vs Joe Rogan, Martin Dihigo, Rube Foster, among other Negro League HOFers.

Agreed that It’s silly to see how Ohtani would do Back then just like all of these RUTH WOULD DOMINATE TODAY arguments.
 
Last edited:

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,043
865
113
Ohtani at 27 next to Trout.


GO RU
I made no comment about Ohtani’s physique. That said, I could post a picture of Arnold at 27, wouldn’t mean he would have been a better ball player than a major leaguer.
 

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,043
865
113
Consider it this way - Ruth today would be a good ball player. Ohtani would have been just as dominant 100 years ago.
Ohtani hasn’t dominated current times for a full season yet, so do you still want to stick by this speculative statement to compare 100 years ago?
Ruth was playing against plumbers and roofers. The level of play is vastly better today than it was 100 years ago. We all love Ruth. His feats were incredible. He might even be an all-star today. Or more likely, he'd be just another fat reliever.
Find it interesting that the only insults (whether directed at Ruth or other fans) cast in this thread are by those that favor Ohtani.

If Ohtani were plopped in MLB 100 years ago, how would he be able to hit as many HRs as he does? He would need to play a position to bat. And based on the only facts at hand, Ohtani isn’t one of the best 8 fielders on what has generally been a below average team.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,593
6,825
113
+1 I'd like to see a few more years at this pace before I make that call. Of course, what would Ruth's pitching career have been if there had been DH back then?
Exactly. Ruth played all three outfield positions as well as a little first base. Ohtani would have played once a week in Ruth's day.
 

ru109

All-American
Sep 18, 2011
6,763
5,273
113
109…that sort of supports my opinion. Without today’s medicine, training, etc and take him as is from 1927, he would not be good enough to play in the majors.

Doctor, not exaggerating. I don’t think any 1927 player beamed to 2023 would make a roster.

2023 Vogelbach is an all-star hitting 80 mph fastballs in the 1927 game.

I’m not saying that with modern development regimens and medical care Ruth wouldn’t be good.

Well you kind of have to take everything into consideration in my opinion. No one trained in the 20's but today they do, so you'd have to assume Ruth would also. Also if you put Ohtani into the game in the 20's and 30's his arm might fall all after 3 or 4 seasons of pitching 250 to 300 innings.
 

T2Kplus20

Heisman
May 1, 2007
30,444
18,430
113
Well you kind of have to take everything into consideration in my opinion. No one trained in the 20's but today they do, so you'd have to assume Ruth would also. Also if you put Ohtani into the game in the 20's and 30's his arm might fall all after 3 or 4 seasons of pitching 250 to 300 innings.
+1
Ohtani wouldn't even be able to pitch back then since modern day pitchers are sissies.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
46,450
56,373
113
Ohtani is hitting HR’s in tiny stadiums. Both are impressive but Ruth is still the goat.

I completely forgot about that. They had some cavernous stadiums back then.

Get back to me when he actually plays in a playoff game let alone win a World Series

Wins are so overrated. Much better when everybody gets a participation trophy.

Find it interesting that the only insults (whether directed at Ruth or other fans) cast in this thread are by those that favor Ohtani.

I noticed that too.
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
Athletes get better every generation

That is not to say that great players of the past would not be great players today but overall speed, strength and size progresses each generation

I believe Zappa has posted about the number of pitchers throwing in the 100s in comparison to when he played.
Yeah they're bigger etc, but they're lousy baseball players. No fundamentals or baseball skills. Don't know how to run the bases, slide, beat a tag. Don't know how to field a grounder or throw the ball straight if they do manage to field it. Don't know how to go after a fly ball or pop up & can't throw the ball straight from the outfield, not to mention hit the cut off man. Try to uppercut everything & pull off the ball as well, not to mention not running hard out of the box if they do hit the ball. And oh yeah, they don't hit it that much. And of course they can't bunt. Pitchers can't go more than six innings. All of the above is why the game stinks.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,902
4,365
66
I agree that all previous greats would not be as good if playing today unless they adhered to today's workout and prep standards

My point is that comparing Different generations of players is useless. No one knows how good any of the old timers would be now because they never went through today's processes

Anyone who says otherwise is speculating
I agree. I did say right off the bat (pun intended) that Ruth was a more dominant player in his time than Ohtani is today.

Whatever the top WWI fighter plane was in its day (maybe what von Richthofen flew ?) it would get destroyed by any modern fighter jet in seconds and before the WWI pilot became aware of the enemy.

That is my Ruth point. 1927 Ruth is a nobody in 2023. But he dominated his era more than Ohtani or anyone else since. By that measure, the only comparison we can make, he was the better player.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,902
4,365
66
That has to be one of the worst analogies I've ever heard.
it perfectly explains my point in a simple way most people can comprehend. but not all, sadly. Planes or people or anything, you cant compare performance across different times unless by comparing to others in the same era.
 
Last edited:

Retired711

All-American
Nov 20, 2001
19,664
9,819
58
Comparing players across eras is not workable -- too much has changed in the century between Ruth and Ohtani. All one can say is that Ruth was unique in his era -- more so, I think than Ohtani is in his.
 
Last edited:

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,639
35,961
113
Both Babe Ruth and Ohtani are great players but I believe Ohtani is the greatest player of all time. Babe Ruth played between 1914-1935 almost ten years before any black players could play in the MLB. A major baseball league with all white players without players like Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, and Ken Griffey. The league at that time didn’t have the best pitchers or hitters available. Baseball now searches the world for the best players and the training is more extensive, players in general now are better than in the past. In addition, I believe Ruth was in “murderer row“ and saw more pitches than Ohtani.
he played 5yrs (seasons) against negro league teams and dominated

you guys need learn your history
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20

Westcoast

All-American
Nov 14, 2001
22,416
5,976
113
Haters: Babe Ruth hit mph fastballs thrown by white plumbers.
Counter argument: Why didn't everyone hit 700 HRs then?
Good point. To suggest a guy wasn't talented because he held another job is just ignorant.

Besides, didn't a grocery bagger take the AZ Cardinals to the Super Bowl?

And if Ruth couldn't, I guess Cobb couldn't either?
 
  • Love
Reactions: RUTGERS95