OT: Stock and Investment Thread

rutgersguy1_rivals

New member
Dec 17, 2008
45,216
16,775
0
  • Haha
Reactions: redking

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,845
17,811
113
Looks like it's trying to break through that 24-25 and change area I mentioned is resistance. Very good news. Of course who the replacement is important but the first step is recognizing part of the problem. Jensen and Lisa have any more relatives? lol
Jensen Huang Jr? Intel would be at $50 in a week! I'm still holding this POS so I'm hoping this is the start of a rally.
 

rutgersguy1_rivals

New member
Dec 17, 2008
45,216
16,775
0
Jensen Huang Jr? Intel would be at $50 in a week! I'm still holding this POS so I'm hoping this is the start of a rally.
It’s still bottoming (that’s not usually a V but a process) in my opinion and has a ways to go to come out of it. I mentioned awhile back that 19-20 and change area looked like a good spot to possibly step in and it’s held that area and bounced to this current resistance. I couldn’t say that it will break this area convincingly any time soon but the news is hopeful at least. The replacement and the roadmap are the next key pieces that need to be defined to move meaningfully higher.

This was always going to be a slog similar to GE in some ways. That at least had a jewel, now 2 with the surprising rise of Vernova…INTC has solid pieces and is in the guts of enterprise on some level but nothing of the quality of aerospace at GE so still TBD.
 

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,845
17,811
113
It’s still bottoming (that’s not usually a V but a process) in my opinion and has a ways to go to come out of it. I mentioned awhile back that 19-20 and change area looked like a good spot to possibly step in and it’s held that area and bounced to this current resistance. I couldn’t say that it will break this area convincingly any time soon but the news is hopeful at least. The replacement and the roadmap are the next key pieces that need to be defined to move meaningfully higher.

This was always going to be a slog similar to GE in some ways. That at least had a jewel, now 2 with the surprising rise of Vernova…INTC has solid pieces and is in the guts of enterprise on some level but nothing of the quality of aerospace at GE so still TBD.
I got in during the last big dip, so $25-26 (IIRC). And then round tripped the last rally. It does have valuable parts. I listened to a podcast with a chip expert and his thoughts on INTC were very interesting. Tale as old as time.....why invest in new tech (GPUs) that would eat your cash cow (CPUs)? Oops.

It was all about what NVDA was doing vs INTC. I will try to find it again.
 

ashokan

New member
May 3, 2011
24,066
19,643
0
People on inside know Gelsinger wasn't the problem - Intel was hung to dry . Intel's problem was that their hardware was stuck in a rut while AMD, Apple and TSMC made some innovative and popular hardware. Intel - owned the enterprise market - got big and lazy (and corrupt some will say). As things slid, the marketing/finance people took the wheel - almost always a bad sign. Intel tried selling sizzle instead of steak. They couldn't make chips smaller/faster/cooler but tried to look faster while being hot and power hungry (deadly in enterprise server farms)

The chips act was meant to help Intel make chips in US. However DC made so many DEI hoops to jump through Intel couldn't keep going fast enough and gov held money back. TSMC tried setting-up in US and was also suffocated. Knowing how many people in DC are on the take (CCP) I'm not even sure they wanted chip success. Now Intel has a (temp?) girl boss from marketing and finance. Same old path to sizzle but it wont work now.


“We are disappointed by how long and how slow the dispensing of funds has been,” said Gelsinger in an interview with Bloomberg.

Intel CEO Expresses Disappointment as Delays Persist


Intel’s CHIPS Act grant reduced as production delays and losses mount

This is the meat of the problem:

"Commentators have noted that CHIPS and Science Act money has been sluggish. What they haven’t noticed is that it’s because the CHIPS Act is so loaded with DEI pork that it can’t move...Because equity is so critical, the makers of humanity’s most complex technology must rely on local labor and apprentices from all those underrepresented groups, as TSMC discovered to its dismay..."

DEI killed the CHIPS Act
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423

ashokan

New member
May 3, 2011
24,066
19,643
0
Boss for now...Marketing and finance again

 
Last edited:

RUAldo

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2008
4,329
3,023
113
AAPL with the breakout today.

Apple


Source: MarketSurge
I don’t get the recent Apple move based on what seems like an AI flop (at least for now) although I’m guessing funds rebalancing helps move it higher.

Sold some MSFT yesterday and moved that money to SPOT. Seems to me SPOT has a clear path to domination with less competition than video streaming and just look at what Netflix has done.
 

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,845
17,811
113
I don’t get the recent Apple move based on what seems like an AI flop (at least for now) although I’m guessing funds rebalancing helps move it higher.

Sold some MSFT yesterday and moved that money to SPOT. Seems to me SPOT has a clear path to domination with less competition than video streaming and just look at what Netflix has done.
SPOT is a great company with a promising future. Would love to see a modest pullback to get in.
 

Scarletnut

Active member
Jul 27, 2001
5,428
4,113
77
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1_rivals

RUAldo

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2008
4,329
3,023
113
SPOT is a great company with a promising future. Would love to see a modest pullback to get in.
I’ve been waiting since $300 but dragged my feet. SPOT and COST were two I needed to buy instead of so much MSFT earlier this year.
 

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,845
17,811
113
I’ve been waiting since $300 but dragged my feet. SPOT and COST were two I needed to buy instead of so much MSFT earlier this year.
Been in COST since $710'ish. I bought a mini-pullback but it was still expensive. Happy I did. LOL! Most money is made by buying high and selling higher. Some companies are worth it.
 

RUAldo

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2008
4,329
3,023
113
Historically, massive value traps that provided mediocre total returns. That said, probably holding onto INTC for a GE-style break-up play. Maybe shareholders get lucky.
Telecoms are the only companies in history that sell the equivalent of gold in the palm of your hand - connectivity - yet between regulation and horrible executive leadership they gave away the farm to companies (network parasites) like Apple and Google. Value traps for sure but def worse places to put money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,845
17,811
113
Fedramp authorization meaning USG buys more.
Just tapped out of PLTR (for now). Bought at $18.5 and sold at $71. This small position became very large. Happy to jump back in once it calms down. Thanks to @rurahrah000 for his insights and guidance on the company! I thought about selling a bunch of times during the run up.....happy I didn't until now.
 

rurahrah000

Active member
Aug 21, 2010
3,160
2,113
88
Just tapped out of PLTR (for now). Bought at $18.5 and sold at $71. This small position became very large. Happy to jump back in once it calms down. Thanks to @rurahrah000 for his insights and guidance on the company! I thought about selling a bunch of times during the run up.....happy I didn't until now.
Why did you sell PLTR?
 

RU05

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2015
14,307
8,985
113
Sold half my shares of DEFTF at 2.75. Nice profit with a cost basis of .87. I'd buy back in if it dips significantly.
Feel you sold just as it broke through resistance. Up over $3 now.

Edit: Although I know you are up big in this position and I also wouldn't want an OTC to be too big of a position in my portfolio.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20