I don’t disagree but that’s what the Fed is looking at and they want that down to 2% unless we get high levels of unemployment which hasn’t happened yet.
Agreed, but you are starting to see cracks in the Fed and their awful understanding of simple math.
Recent speech by Harker:
"Survey data are an important tool in the economic business. At the Fed, we look at everything from big broad numbers like GDP and employment growth to more granular figures like restaurant reservations and mobility data. These data — hard data — tell us a lot.
But as a policymaker, I’ve come to believe that soft data like survey results are perhaps equally important to getting a full understanding of our economic situation. Candidly, an overemphasis on hard data can lead to policy errors; last year, hard data suggested to us that inflation would be “transitory,” whereas the soft data we were hearing from our contacts indicated that rising prices were proving more persistent than we may have expected. Which is to say, paying due attention to soft data is vitally important to effective policymaking."
Amen! This is a nice step forward and I'm optimistic that with Bullard getting the boot in 2023 (no vote) and Goolsbee (pragmatic with political experience) coming in, the Fed is learning from their mistakes. The market is right. The market understands that data better than the Fed. The Fed needs to catch up with how they use data.