I seem to be the only person who believes the official story. The story seems plausible to me, and no one has yet pointed out any facts that disprove it. I doubt that the interpreter would be taking the fall for Ohtani when there is a risk of a long sentence. (BTW, the judge is *not* bound by the government's sentencing recommendation no matter how lenient it may be.)
no one can really say what the truth is and it's not out of the realm of possibility that Ohtani didn't know anything that went on, from beginning to end.
I'm just skeptical and tend to think there's a good chance Ohtani didn't know about the bets until the interpreter came to him for help paying .
Then to avoid someone in his inner circle being exposed for their gambling Ohtani decided to pay off the loses rather than have the press all over him about his interpreter and good friend's gambling habit.
Once the interpreter exposed the payment Ohtani's lawyers jumped in and the cover-up started.
The judge might be asked by Ohtani , off the record, to show mercy and sentence the interpreter to less then the prosecution asks for based on what Ohtani or his representative said they felt about the interpreter using Ohtani's money to gamble.
Heck: this might have started out with a small bet Ohtani knew his interpreter was placing , thinking it was just a one time thing and didn't know that interpreter kept betting and for higher amounts .
When interpreter told Ohtani the truth and what owed, Ohtani decided better pay off the interpreter's losses than have his involvement with first bet exposed .
Far fetched, I admit it, but everyting about this is a little strange