OT: Worst Umpire Decision in MLB History?

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
29,860
21,745
113
Note I did not say worst call. I said worst decision.

It happened in last night's Orioles - White Sox game. Bottom 9, O's up 2 runs, runners on 1st and 2nd, one out. Batter hits a high pop near second base. Infield fly rule is called. Runner on second retreats to the base as the shortstop catches the ball near second.

BUT, while retreating to the base, the runner on second barely stepped into the path of the shortstop who was tracking the ball. The runner had no idea he had done so, as the shortshop was behind him. The shortshop, who could see what was happening in front of him, easily stepped around the retreating runner (the retreating walker, actually) and made the routine catch. And none of it mattered anyway, since the batter had already been called out.

Nonetheless, the second base ump saw fit to call the runner out for interference. Double play, game over.

Yeah I guess it's a rule book call, but shouldn't common sense come into play here?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andrew Vaughn is called for interference after an infield fly rule. An Absolutely BRUTAL call to end the game.... <a href="https://t.co/AyhCWwiHeY">pic.twitter.com/AyhCWwiHeY</a></p>&mdash; White Sox Talk (@NBCSWhiteSox) <a href="">May 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutHut_rivals

Barnaby&Neill

All-American
Dec 10, 2010
6,946
7,534
81
Note I did not say worst call. I said worst decision.

It happened in last night's Orioles - White Sox game. Bottom 9, O's up 2 runs, runners on 1st and 2nd, one out. Batter hits a high pop near second base. Infield fly rule is called. Runner on second retreats to the base as the shortstop catches the ball near second.

BUT, while retreating to the base, the runner on second barely stepped into the path of the shortstop who was tracking the ball. The runner had no idea he had done so, as the shortshop was behind him. The shortshop, who could see what was happening in front of him, easily stepped around the retreating runner (the retreating walker, actually) and made the routine catch. And none of it mattered anyway, since the batter had already been called out.

Nonetheless, the second base ump saw fit to call the runner out for interference. Double play, game over.

Yeah I guess it's a rule book call, but shouldn't common sense come into play here?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andrew Vaughn is called for interference after an infield fly rule. An Absolutely BRUTAL call to end the game.... <a href="https://t.co/AyhCWwiHeY">pic.twitter.com/AyhCWwiHeY</a></p>&mdash; White Sox Talk (@NBCSWhiteSox) <a href="">May 24, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Terrible call…I wish Hawk Harrelson was still on the broadcast for it.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: 4IUSox2

Barnaby&Neill

All-American
Dec 10, 2010
6,946
7,534
81
I’ll have to look this one up. Logic would ask how can there be interference when batter already called out.

I read that the outcome (out or safe) doesn’t come into play…and I think guys can advance at their own risk after an infield fly, but the umpire still has discretion whether or not to make the call, and it’s clear that Vaughn wasn’t intentionally interfering to create an opportunity to advance.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
15,730
13,701
0
Looked like the shortstop initially took a bad angle to the ball and made it appear that the runner was obstructing him.

By going around the runner he was actually in a better position to make the catch.

Terrible call to end the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4IUSox2

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,971
0
Was this a worse call than screwing that pitcher out of his perfect game?
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
29,860
21,745
113
Was this a worse call than screwing that pitcher out of his perfect game?
It was not a worse call. It was a worse DECISION.

The call you refer to was a blown call. Umpires miss calls all the time. That one was particularly egregious, but **** happens. It happens less frequently nowadays with replay, but it still happens.

What happened on Thursday was an insanely stupid decision, to make a call that did not need to be made, and took the outcome of the game out of the hands of the players.
 
Sep 29, 2005
14,051
16,131
0
It was not a worse call. It was a worse DECISION.

The call you refer to was a blown call. Umpires miss calls all the time. That one was particularly egregious, but **** happens. It happens less frequently nowadays with replay, but it still happens.

What happened on Thursday was an insanely stupid decision, to make a call that did not need to be made, and took the outcome of the game out of the hands of the players.
Your last statement is a nonsense argument. Rule is to step on home plate. There is no option. Using your standard, then referees in the Osu/ru bball game made the right non-call.
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
29,860
21,745
113
Your last statement is a nonsense argument. Rule is to step on home plate. There is no option. Using your standard, then referees in the Osu/ru bball game made the right non-call.
I am referring to the White Sox interference call at second base. Not sure what stepping on home plate has to do with anything.

I stand by my last statement. If the call is not made, White Sox have tying run on first with two out. No one knows what would have happened, but the players would have determined it. Instead, the outcome was determined by one man wearing black whom no one paid to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4IUSox2
Sep 29, 2005
14,051
16,131
0
I am referring to the White Sox interference call at second base. Not sure what stepping on home plate has to do with anything.

I stand by my last statement. If the call is not made, White Sox have tying run on first with two out. No one knows what would have happened, but the players would have determined it. Instead, the outcome was determined by one man wearing black whom no one paid to see.
Sorry. Mixing up the worst calls in baseball threads. Agree that really wasn’t interference. Now if it resulted in player missing pop and runner taking a base, then I would call it in that case.