I will start off by saying that Rodgers is, without a doubt, dirty. He and others like him are the key to free agency in college football. What is the purpose of his job? To match players with schools that are appropriate for them. Should these players not be making these type of decisions for themselves with their families? How does he determine which schools are best? To me, this is a pretty blatant profession mirroring an agent. I'm just curious how much he charges for it - from the prospect and the school.
I think there is no way that MSU gets out of this without a scratch. We may not get in as much trouble as Auburn, assuming that Cecil asked
more than just the one school for money, but we sure will get ours. Slive
gets a bitter taste in his mouth any time someone merely mentions
Mississippi State University, and now it looks like we're ruining a nat'l. title season and breaking...no, shattering his promise that no school will
be on probation while he is in office. You can bet he'll get us, one way or another.
We'll be lucky if we're still IN the SEC when he's done.
The fact that 2 recruiters "that were not coaches" were in talks with Cecil scare me, a lot. If they were not coaches then they should not be having contact with prospective recruits. We will get the shaft for this, it is FAR from over. CAMNEW may be ruled ineligible, but that will most definitely not be the end of this long and winding road to the slaughterhouse. This may rival the agent party fiasco in Miami(FL), and it's going to make the NCAA take another look and reappraise of the way recruiting works, specifically the way people such as Rodgers operate. I don't know what kind of changes they will implement but I do think it will shake things up a bit.