Poll: will Flood keep his job with a win v. Maryland

Will Flood keep his HC job with a win v. Maryland


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

ScarletStateofNJ

All-Conference
Jul 6, 2011
3,176
2,588
0
Given all the facts as they are, do you thing that RU will bring Flood back if RU beats Maryland next week?
 

OC Knight

All-Conference
Oct 24, 2010
2,464
1,873
67
I think if we smack them around and beat them by 21 the BOG considers keeping him. Not what I want but what I think they will do.
 

cRURah

All-Conference
Nov 13, 2004
4,845
3,800
62
We've been there before in 2013. Nothing has changed except substitute Maryland for USF. Same Pres, AD and coach. We know what they did then and can predict what they'll do now.
 

tico brown

Heisman
Oct 16, 2005
43,244
13,282
93
I THINK KYLE FLOOD SHOULD NOT BE COACHING RUTGERS IN 2016. I WOULD SEE IF ONE OF THOSE YOUNGER MAC/AAC COACHES ARE AVAILABLE...

That said, if they beat Maryland, he stays. The line is going to be that Flood deserve another chance because he lost his whole secondary, he had too many injuries to overcome, he had a first year, inexperienced starter at QB, new Offensive Linemen to break in. And with all of this going on along with the schedule, a 5-7 record was seen as a good enough season back in August.

IMO, Flood have made lots of decisions on field to makes you pull your own teeth out. And off the field that may put this program in jeopardy. But what do I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

ru109

All-American
Sep 18, 2011
6,758
5,249
113
I think Flood keeps his job regardless. Actually I thought even if we lost to army and Maryland and finished with only 3 wins he would keep his job. Rutgers is just too cheap to fire him and he's going to stay on until his contract is finish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megadrone

ScarletStateofNJ

All-Conference
Jul 6, 2011
3,176
2,588
0
But but but his extension was paid for with donor money....so it won't cost RU anything more to fire him
 

Ridge 22

All-American
Jun 30, 2007
7,346
9,428
98
The decision should have been made long ago. Only at RU would we allow a meaningless win against a terrible team to end the season factor into the equation. Unfortunately we know from the USF game 2 years ago that this is exactly how our mindless administration goes about things though. The fear of this is so great that I am seriously considering rooting for us to lose next week if that is what it takes to ensure a change is made. As hard as it would be to do, at some point I would rather loss the battle to win the war if it comes to that.
 

KingHigh

All-American
Apr 12, 2005
21,293
9,216
0
The decision should have been made long ago. Only at RU would we allow a meaningless win against a terrible team to end the season factor into the equation. Unfortunately we know from the USF game 2 years ago that this is exactly how our mindless administration goes about things though. The fear of this is so great that I am seriously considering rooting for us to lose next week if that is what it takes to ensure a change is made. As hard as it would be to do, at some point I would rather loss the battle to win the war if it comes to that.

If Maryland knows Flood stays if RU wins, will Maryland intentionally throw the game? I bet they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus10

RUJohnny99

All-American
Nov 7, 2003
64,667
5,961
113
Recent comments from our president make me very nervous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bori_blanco

wcfan10

Sophomore
Feb 22, 2010
492
114
0
if Flood is not fired after Maryland, regardless of the outcome, then you'll know exactly how Barchi feels about athletics at RU. Its just a nuisance that takes money away from academics. The less we spend on it the better....
 

RUinPAC10land

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2011
4,408
2,158
0
I think Flood keeps his job regardless. Actually I thought even if we lost to army and Maryland and finished with only 3 wins he would keep his job. Rutgers is just too cheap to fire him and he's going to stay on until his contract is finish.

I unfortunately agree.
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
23,811
15,897
113
This Maryland game has nothing to do with him staying or going.

As others has said, this report that is coming out means alot. You don't hire a P.I. to prove your spouse is faithful to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJ_RU

lighty

All-Conference
Aug 13, 2003
9,935
4,221
0
I still believe the decision has already been made. We end the season with two of the worst teams. If you remove Indiana, the wins are about as low as you can go. And Indiana isn't a great win either.

Other than money, is there any reason at all for him to come back?

People point to the suspensions, doesn't the coach deserve some blame for those? And injuries happen every year. Flood has been here long enough to build depth if the recruiting was good.

Oh but there are so many teams looking for a new coach... Every year teams will be looking for a new coach. That's no reason to keep him.
 

RUsilencer

Junior
Oct 27, 2013
408
270
0
Flood will not be at the helm in 2016
We will not beat Maryland with Laviano at qb unless Carroo plays. The poll will be moot on the latter
 

KingHigh

All-American
Apr 12, 2005
21,293
9,216
0
Flood will not be at the helm in 2016
We will not beat Maryland with Laviano at qb unless Carroo plays. The poll will be moot on the latter

I hope you're right. I cannot go through another season with Chris laviano at quarterback.
 

RUschool

Heisman
Jan 23, 2004
49,910
14,001
78
We would come in fifth in the Big Ten East behing Michigan State, Ohio State, Michigan and Penn State.

Penn State realizing they will be fourth for a long time.
 

lighty

All-Conference
Aug 13, 2003
9,935
4,221
0
Penn State realizing they will be fourth for a long time.

I think that's just wishful thinking. Penn State will be much better in the next few years as they get farther and farther away from the sanctions. You can hate the school, but they WANT to win and will INVEST in the program to win. They won't allow themselves to be down the way RU allows itself to be down.
 

RU31trap

Senior
Sep 30, 2010
3,143
959
0
At the end of the day one can only speculate. We gather as much information as possible and from that information we try to determine the most plausible outcome. First strike against Coach Flood was a three game suspension for contacting a professor over an athletes grade. However, some flippant comments from Robert Barchi (BRG90 is spot on) left me rather puzzled.
1) Our performance or a lack of was expected, no one should be surprised. Heck we play in the B10 now.

2) We're looking at 6 years before we could grade our level of competitiveness.

This is what I'm hearing from Barchi: I know what you want but it's not happening under my watch unless a couple of rich guys are willing to foot the bill.

So what's left? Yep you're right, the last two games of the year. Game 1 goes to Flood. A game 2 victory over MD creates an overwhelming argument for the administration to keep him. JMHO
 

lighty

All-Conference
Aug 13, 2003
9,935
4,221
0
So what's left? Yep you're right, the last two games of the year. Game 1 goes to Flood. A game 2 victory over MD creates an overwhelming argument for the administration to keep him. JMHO

"Overwhelming"?? LOL

He will have beaten one somewhat decent team and three utterly horrible teams. That's good enough?
 

OldManRiver1

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2002
3,292
1,418
113
Is this the new spin? A new staff costs $6 million, so we better keep the piece of spit staff we have for $4 million?

What F'ing spin RU talking about?
Do the math Einstein:
Head coach...2.5-3m
DC/OC 1.5-2m
Remaining staff 1m

Anything less...same old Rutgers!!
 

RU31trap

Senior
Sep 30, 2010
3,143
959
0
Let's come to our senses for a moment and truly think about the increase in cost. A guy like Kiffen or Rodriguez would require 2.5 million plus incentives and before accepting the job they would try to negotiate either specific OC/DC's or a committment by the admin to allow them to hire qualified coordinators that will cost 900k. That could translate to an increase of 2 millions dollars at a minimum per year. Project this over a 5 year period and you could be looking at 10 to 12 million dollars. Where are you going to get this money? Look at Livingston campus, where do you think they got that money for all that new construction? Rutgers generated a windfall of money from that Bond referendum. In 20 years when those Bonds mature what's going to happen, issue more bonds to pay the existing ones? Some on this site say that Rutgers has a 3.78 billion budget but what's their burn rate? 3.80 billion? Seriously!!
 
Last edited:

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
He is not going anywhere absent another scandal. Despite what you hear on this free board by "insiders" there is simply no money or will at this time to fire Flood and pay a new coach and staff. Do I want a new coach, YES!, will we have to live with this fool for at least another year, YES AGAIN!
 

RUMBA-JK

All-Conference
Jun 13, 2014
2,717
1,606
0
We've been there before in 2013. Nothing has changed except substitute Maryland for USF. Same Pres, AD and coach. We know what they did then and can predict what they'll do now.

The only thing that has changed is the degree to which one would now need to be a wildly exuberant delusional optimist to believe that Flood could transform into a shrewd strategic thinker with a comprehensive plan to elevate the quality and success of the program.
In 2013 it was plausible to think (or at least it was possible to grant a 'benefit of doubt') that Flood had the potential to turn the corner - that he might possibly be one of those guys who grow into the job ... now, as 2015 finishes up, one has to come to grips with Flood's 'body of work' , Flood's inability to build the program, Flood's pattern of mistakes.