The article is saying that RG has entered and undisclosed treatment facility. Are we sure this is just about weed?
It was probably required by his employer to show an effort to get clean. I agree for weed it seems a little silly.
In a common sense world, I agree, but in a public business like the NFL, weed will never be accepted. At least not in the near (or likely far) future. That would be PR suicide.
I think that's pretty much what the NBA has done.
but, I don't think he should be high on the job. and the problem is they don't have testing specific enough to determine, if he's high while on the job or on his own time.
there's a big difference to me if he's high while playing or practicing, compared to if he's out fishing or watching a movie at home.
Actually, there better ways to detect the immediacy of the usage. As you alluded to, urine tests will only measure what the THC breaks down into, so they test for pass usage and not current intoxication. But, one of the issues with some of the states it's been legalized in is DWI. That's driven more blood testing which tests directly for active chemicals. There is still considerable disagreement on what constitutes being high, but it's at least more accurate the urine tests. I believe saliva tests also target current intoxication, but they are less reliable.
The feds need to revise their testing guidelines to target current intoxication (via blood) rather than pass usage (via urine.) Most employers who do random drug tests follow the fed guidelines because it provides some legal protection versus privacy or unfair termination suits. I suspect this will be the second federal legislative change if the pro-legalization movement continues. (The first will be to formalize a hands-off approach on states where it is legal.)