RATM in Minneapolis

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
22,191
20,739
113
Dynamite drop in, per usual.



By all means, please produce these. I don't doubt it's happened, but the overwhelming majority comes from the trailer trash tandem of JHP and Allornothing.

If what he wrote is borderline sexual harassment - so is everything those other two dipshits post. It would be nice to see some consistent moderation of both parties if you are being sincere with your policing.
Nope. @FLaw47 Changed my mind. I think they should be able to show their douchiness on the board.
 

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
In general, they don’t allow for any deviation to their agenda. Ironically there’s no diversity of thought or opinion from the DEI crowd. They’re cultish. They label you and I as the same but we differ wildly on some of our beliefs and agree on others, we allow individuals to have their own beliefs and opinions as long as the core values are respected, not so much from the other side.

This is actually an interesting study - I've posted it below if you had any interest in reading it.
The 8 questions asked are below, and they were asked to respond on a 1-5 scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Seems like Dems were more resolute in their choices (choosing more of the strongly agree/disagree options) whereas Republicans tended to only tick the "mostly" boxes.
Item 1) Abortion should be illegal.

Item 2) The government should take steps to make incomes more equal.

Item 3) All unauthorized immigrants should be sent back to their home country.

Item 4) The federal budget for welfare programs should be increased.

Item 5) Lesbian, gay and trans couples should be allowed to legally marry.

Item 6) The government should regulate business to protect the environment.

Item 7) The federal government should make it more difficult to buy a gun.

Item 8) The federal government should make a concerted effort to improve social and economic conditions for African Americans.


It's a very interesting study that goes into the thought processes of your typical R and D voter. Thanks for sharing this
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Firegiver is a prominent leftist poster. This is not just a MAGAt thing. Good try though.


View attachment 1177258
I didn't say it was just a MAGA thing. I said it's more common with the MAGA posters. In fact, I even said in the post you quoted that i don't doubt it has happened.

Also, if you had to go back to 2025 to find an instance, that's not a good sign.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
They're saying the same thing that JHP, allornothing, rest of the diehard MAGAs say EVERY DAY to the people they disagree with. Disregarding the **** those on your side say but clutching your pearls for those whose politics you disagree with isn't really moving the needle for me. I don't think there's anything healthy about this back and forth, but it's not anything that doesn't happen on this forum daily.
Ahhhhh, so you just call me out and none of these people. Interesting. I can assure you that you will not find any posts from me that are this vulgar. Just thought it was interesting that you singled me out for much less, much much less. Btw I’m not @ people and calling them immature teenagers like you either. Just for the record a little consistency would be nice.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
I treat everyone with respect who has earned it. I don't give preferential treatment to anyone based on their class/creed/race/etc. I don't agree with the constant namecalling and defamatory remarks, and I'll admit I'm guilty of doing it from time to time, but this whole act is hilarious. Feigning outrage over some posters being rude when you are the poster child for shitposting is incredibly rich.
Like you did to me yesterday right? Fake outrage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Like you did to me yesterday right? Fake outrage.

I treat everyone with respect who has earned it. I don't give preferential treatment to anyone based on their class/creed/race/etc. I don't agree with the constant namecalling and defamatory remarks, and I'll admit I'm guilty of doing it from time to time, but this whole act is hilarious. Feigning outrage over some posters being rude when you are the poster child for shitposting is incredibly rich.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Ahhhhh, so you just call me out and none of these people. Interesting. I can assure you that you will not find any posts from me that are this vulgar. Just thought it was interesting that you singled me out for much less, much much less. Btw I’m not @ people and calling them immature teenagers like you either. Just for the record a little consistency would be nice.
I'll call them out when you call out JHP/Allornothing/the rest of the diehard MAGAs for their inflammatory remarks. I'm not the internet police, and I'm definitely not innocent of having engaged in shitposting like everyone else.

Also, vulgarity is subjective - I don't really see anything that was said to Amy that hasn't been said ad nauseum to others on this forum during a heated argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
22,191
20,739
113
I didn't say it was just a MAGA thing. I said it's more common with the MAGA posters. In fact, I even said in the post you quoted that i don't doubt it has happened.

Also, if you had to go back to 2025 to find an instance, that's not a good sign.
That's just the one that I membered as the most obvious. There are plenty more, but i'll let you do your own research.

There are plenty of people from both sides that use gay as an insult.

Now, back to reminding Rich to stop sexually harassing women.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
22,191
20,739
113
I'll call them out when you call out JHP/Allornothing/the rest of the diehard MAGAs for their inflammatory remarks. I'm not the internet police, and I'm definitely not innocent of having engaged in shitposting like everyone else.

Also, vulgarity is subjective - I don't really see anything that was said to Amy that hasn't been said ad nauseum to others on this forum during a heated argument.
You don't see anything wrong with telling a woman to get on her knees and suck a d ick as part of an argument?

We were raised different.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
You don't see anything wrong with telling a woman to get on her knees and suck a d ick as part of an argument?

We were raised different.
A better question is if your mom, daughter, wife or sister were debating something with a man and that man told them to suck his dick how would he react?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
I'll call them out when you call out JHP/Allornothing/the rest of the diehard MAGAs for their inflammatory remarks. I'm not the internet police, and I'm definitely not innocent of having engaged in shitposting like everyone else.

Also, vulgarity is subjective - I don't really see anything that was said to Amy that hasn't been said ad nauseum to others on this forum during a heated argument.
That’s not my point. The point is you sought me out to tell me that I was an immature teenager. I don’t go around calling people names or telling them how to act. You do, so be consistent. Don’t just come @ me bc I don’t align with you 100% and give free passes to your boys. That’s bullshyt. I wasn’t even having a conversation with you when you popped off.
 

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,020
12,805
102
A better question is if your mom, daughter, wife or sister were debating something with a man and that man told them to suck his dick how would he react?

I thought the poster's comment was inappropriate, but you are misrepresenting what he said. He did not tell her to suck his d1ck. He referenced her sucking trump's d1ck.

This happens on this board daily, most often from the right. Y'all are upset bc it was directed at a woman. Again, I understand that. But the selective outrage is a little much.

And LOL at @fatpiggy - the guy who welshes on bets - talking about how he was raised as superior to anyone.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
I thought the poster's comment was inappropriate, but you are misrepresenting what he said. He did not tell her to suck his d1ck. He referenced her sucking trump's d1ck.

This happens on this board daily, most often from the right. Y'all are upset bc it was directed at a woman. Again, I understand that. But the selective outrage is a little much.

And LOL at @fatpiggy - the guy who welshes on bets - talking about how he was raised as superior to anyone.
Ohhh. That makes it better. Instead of telling your wife to suck my dick, I can just say suck Trumps dick and it’s ok. Got it. And quit lumping people. I only involved myself bc one of the left leaning posters took it upon themselves to scold me for being rude just yesterday. If it’s good for me, it’s good for them too.
 

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
That’s not my point. The point is you sought me out to tell me that I was an immature teenager. I don’t go around calling people names or telling them how to act. You do, so be consistent. Don’t just come @ me bc I don’t align with you 100% and give free passes to your boys. That’s bullshyt. I wasn’t even having a conversation with you when you popped off.
I mean you're doing the same thing ITT you're chastising me about. Rich wasn't talking to you, but you inserted yourself into the conversation because you had a grievance with the way someone was being spoken to.
 

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,020
12,805
102
Ohhh. That makes it better. Instead of telling your wife to suck my dick, I can just say suck Trumps dick and it’s ok. Got it. And quit lumping people. I only involved myself bc one of the left leaning posters took it upon themselves to scold me for being rude just yesterday. If it’s good for me, it’s good for them too.

Well, for one thing, my wife would never be on an anonymous message board insulting people. She is pretty unimpressed that I spend any of my own time doing it.

Secondly, if she changed her mind and decided to join an anonymous message board where people constantly attack each other, and she started attacking others, I would tell her to stop if she did not like what people were saying to her. If she told me she wanted to sue anonymous message board posters for libel, I would laugh and tell her to take some meds.

I have been on this board for a long time, this is a pattern for amynhop.

1. She insults people.
2. People insult her back.
3. She loses her **** and cries about being a woman, asks Ard to ban people, but continues to insult people.
4. A bunch of white knights like yourself rush to her aid.
5. More insults are shared, by her and the white knights.

This even happened once when someone posted a thread titled, "post your photo so people can roast you." She did it, then lost her **** when people started roasting her.

Rinse and repeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
I mean you're doing the same thing ITT you're chastising me about. Rich wasn't talking to you, but you inserted yourself into the conversation because you had a grievance with the way someone was being spoken to.
Like I told you yesterday. I return the treatment I am given. And we could all take a step back and pump the brakes on some of the name calling. I don’t think talking to women like that is productive or right. And if you dislike Trump as much as you claim, I think you’d agree with me. Regardless I was simply pointing out the seeming contradiction here. We can agree to disagree.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
Well, for one thing, my wife would never be on an anonymous message board insulting people. She is pretty unimpressed that I spend any of my own time doing it.

Secondly, if she changed her mind and decided to join an anonymous message board where people constantly attack each other, and she started attacking others, I would tell her to stop if she did not like what people were saying to her. If she told me she wanted to sue anonymous message board posters for libel, I would laugh and tell her to take some meds.

I have been on this board for a long time, this is a pattern for amynhop.

1. She insults people.
2. People insult her back.
3. She loses her **** and cries about being a woman, asks Ard to ban people, but continues to insult people.
4. A bunch of white knights like yourself rush to her aid.
5. More insults are shared, by her and the white knights.

This even happened once when someone posted a thread titled, "post your photo so people can roast you." She did it, then lost her **** when people started roasting her.

Rinse and repeat.
I’m unaware of any of that. Don’t know that to be true but also don’t know that to be inaccurate. It’s unfortunate. I was raised to treat women more genteel and kind, not saying it’s right, I just wouldn’t talk to a woman that way no matter what. Just like I would never hit a woman no matter what, aside from trying to protect my life or my family.
 

amynhop

Heisman
Nov 15, 2005
13,668
41,947
113
These are the rules listed by On3 message board. No different than Rivals but nothing is ever enforced. Much like the NCAA and tampering. It’s not asking too much to disagree respectfully. Any man who addresses anyone, much less a woman, with that kind of vulgarity has a problem. Enough is enough. This ain’t the Wild Wild West. There has to be some type of governance.
Well, for one thing, my wife would never be on an anonymous message board insulting people. She is pretty unimpressed that I spend any of my own time doing it.

Secondly, if she changed her mind and decided to join an anonymous message board where people constantly attack each other, and she started attacking others, I would tell her to stop if she did not like what people were saying to her. If she told me she wanted to sue anonymous message board posters for libel, I would laugh and tell her to take some meds.

I have been on this board for a long time, this is a pattern for amynhop.

1. She insults people.
2. People insult her back.
3. She loses her **** and cries about being a woman, asks Ard to ban people, but continues to insult people.
4. A bunch of white knights like yourself rush to her aid.
5. More insults are shared, by her and the white knights.

This even happened once when someone posted a thread titled, "post your photo so people can roast you." She did it, then lost her **** when people started roasting her.

Rinse and repeat.



You’re a liar. People insult me and after multiple times…I may return a small portion of the treatment I receive.

Rules didn’t post. There are clearly stated rules against these things.
 

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Like I told you yesterday. I return the treatment I am given. And we could all take a step back and pump the brakes on some of the name calling. I don’t think talking to women like that is productive or right. And if you dislike Trump as much as you claim, I think you’d agree with me. Regardless I was simply pointing out the seeming contradiction here. We can agree to disagree.
My dislike of Trump is a relatively new experience - as in the last 8-10 months. Prior to that I had no real issue with him beyond his crassness, hyperbolic speaking, and sexual misconduct claims. If his current term was anything like term 1 I'd not really have any issues at all.

Agreed with taking a step back and cooling down. I don't think talking to anyone like that - be it woman or man - is productive or right, but I understand your stance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
My dislike of Trump is a relatively new experience - as in the last 8-10 months. Prior to that I had no real issue with him beyond his crassness, hyperbolic speaking, and sexual misconduct claims. If his current term was anything like term 1 I'd not really have any issues at all.

Agreed with taking a step back and cooling down. I don't think talking to anyone like that - be it woman or man - is productive or right, but I understand your stance.
Tell me more about the last 8-10 months. What changed?
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
These are the rules listed by On3 message board. No different than Rivals but nothing is ever enforced. Much like the NCAA and tampering. It’s not asking too much to disagree respectfully. Any man who addresses anyone, much less a woman, with that kind of vulgarity has a problem. Enough is enough. This ain’t the Wild Wild West. There has to be some type of governance.



You’re a liar. People insult me and after multiple times…I may return a small portion of the treatment I receive.

Rules didn’t post. There are clearly stated rules against these things.
I can also believe this, this is similar to my experience in here. I posted my thoughts, got called horrible names and started giving it back. But nothing like this. I didn’t actively seek out or start **** talking anyone on here. I was really just curious to see what people thought. Then I apparently became a nazi.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,022
3,053
93
These are the rules listed by On3 message board. No different than Rivals but nothing is ever enforced. Much like the NCAA and tampering. It’s not asking too much to disagree respectfully. Any man who addresses anyone, much less a woman, with that kind of vulgarity has a problem. Enough is enough. This ain’t the Wild Wild West. There has to be some type of governance.



You’re a liar. People insult me and after multiple times…I may return a small portion of the treatment I receive.

Rules didn’t post. There are clearly stated rules against these things.
Honest question: if it is so horrible, then why do you not ignore the posters you don't like? Or even post in these threads in general? Said another way, why is the right answer changing it the way you want vs just extricating yourself from the undesirable situation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan

amynhop

Heisman
Nov 15, 2005
13,668
41,947
113
I can also believe this, this is similar to my experience in here. I posted my thoughts, got called horrible names and started giving it back. But nothing like this. I didn’t actively seek out or start **** talking anyone on here. I was really just curious to see what people thought. Then I apparently became a nazi.


You nailed it. That’s always the case. And it’s usually the same habitual offenders. That’s why I’m rarely on here anymore. I read the football stuff. I have been posting in this thread more than I have in years. Defending myself but you can fix stupid.

And when I commented in this thread; it was in the West Zone. I never go to the Politics board and post. For this very reason. It’s not safe. Shameful.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
You nailed it. That’s always the case. And it’s usually the same habitual offenders. That’s why I’m rarely on here anymore. I read the football stuff. I have been posting in this thread more than I have in years. Defending myself but you can fix stupid.

And when I commented in this thread; it was in the West Zone. I never go to the Politics board and post. For this very reason. It’s not safe. Shameful.
There’s some nasty people out there. When that dude literally typed out that he hoped my wife and children die in a house fire that was a little surprising. He still may be around. It was @DW4_2016. Seemed extreme considering that was because of ideological differences that are probably minimal. Hurt people hurt people I guess.
 

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Tell me more about the last 8-10 months. What changed?
It's mainly due to the gaggle of morons he hired into his cabinet vs in his first term. You've got podcasters in charge of the FBI, an unimpressive AG, Halligan at the DOJ, etc. I don't like the way he's seemingly pardoning anyone who donates money to him, I don't like the crypto **** that is CLEARLY shady at best and corrupt at worst, and I don't like the way we're rolling out federal troops into cities. I support removing criminal illegal immigrants, but I think we can do it in a way that doesn't violate the constitution or treats people like subhumans.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,022
3,053
93
You nailed it. That’s always the case. And it’s usually the same habitual offenders. That’s why I’m rarely on here anymore. I read the football stuff. I have been posting in this thread more than I have in years. Defending myself but you can fix stupid.

And when I commented in this thread; it was in the West Zone. I never go to the Politics board and post. For this very reason. It’s not safe. Shameful.
You recognize this is a two-way street, right? Some of the folks you might align yourself with or who might seem as the proverbial white knights in this context type/write some pretty raunchy, offensive, inflammatory stuff, right? I mean, the **** slinging happens by many (myself included)...
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
It's mainly due to the gaggle of morons he hired into his cabinet vs in his first term. You've got podcasters in charge of the FBI, an unimpressive AG, Halligan at the DOJ, etc. I don't like the way he's seemingly pardoning anyone who donates money to him, I don't like the crypto **** that is CLEARLY shady at best and corrupt at worst, and I don't like the way we're rolling out federal troops into cities. I support removing criminal illegal immigrants, but I think we can do it in a way that doesn't violate the constitution or treats people like subhumans.
Agreed. I understand why he chose those people - meaning I believe he’s convinced that the DC insiders derailed his last administration. Some of the pardons make no sense. All fair points and reasonable. I cannot believe you’re the same person lol.
 

Dadar

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2003
4,090
3,163
113
Personally i differentiate for women. Just the way i was raised, to respect women. But your point is taken. There are plenty of people on the left that have made gay slurs too, that i called out, that i'll be happy to use the quote feature if you want. It's not just a MAGA thing.

None the less, reading what he wrote is borderline sexual harrassment. He is well within his rights to say it but it's a bad look and people get sued for those types of comments in a work place. Maybe it's just downright distasteful and @RichOne420 is just a huge douche? That could be where this ends up.
FP, a has expressed that trump is doing God's work and at the same time seemingly ignoring his comments about grabing girls/women by the p====.

She seems rather myopic by her comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

PawPride

All-American
Nov 28, 2004
52,831
9,998
113
Agreed. I understand why he chose those people - meaning I believe he’s convinced that the DC insiders derailed his last administration. Some of the pardons make no sense. All fair points and reasonable. I cannot believe you’re the same person lol.
I think this is accurate, as well. Especially, if you look at some of the articles involving John Kelly where Trump would tell xyz to do something, and when they'd go off Kelly would stop them from doing it because Kelly thought it would be bad and Trump would forget. The problem now is he's hired nothing but sycophants who will do everything he says, so you end up with no real guard rails in place on an aging president who has a LOT of grievances against the establishment.
 

amynhop

Heisman
Nov 15, 2005
13,668
41,947
113
FP, a has expressed that trump is doing God's work and at the same time seemingly ignoring his comments about grabing girls/women by the p====.

She seems rather myopic by her comments.


I said Trump was being used by God and God uses imperfect men all the time for His plans. Why don’t you lie some more?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,313
2,948
113
There’s some nasty people out there. When that dude literally typed out that he hoped my wife and children die in a house fire that was a little surprising. He still may be around. It was @DW4_2016. Seemed extreme considering that was because of ideological differences that are probably minimal. Hurt people hurt people I guess.
Almost equally as shocking as when you threatened to murder me.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
4,756
7,758
113
I think this is accurate, as well. Especially, if you look at some of the articles involving John Kelly where Trump would tell xyz to do something, and when they'd go off Kelly would stop them from doing it because Kelly thought it would be bad and Trump would forget. The problem now is he's hired nothing but sycophants who will do everything he says, so you end up with no real guard rails in place on an aging president who has a LOT of grievances against the establishment.
He has too many YES men for sure. I don’t like those insiders but you need some balance, you need people that can tell you no occasionally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawPride

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
22,191
20,739
113
You recognize this is a two-way street, right? Some of the folks you might align yourself with or who might seem as the proverbial white knights in this context type/write some pretty raunchy, offensive, inflammatory stuff, right? I mean, the **** slinging happens by many (myself included)...
Sling all the **** you want. But if you tell a woman to get on her knees and suck your d!ck as a response to an argument you are **** stain of a person. It was borderline sexual harassment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amynhop

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
22,191
20,739
113
FP, a has expressed that trump is doing God's work and at the same time seemingly ignoring his comments about grabing girls/women by the p====.

She seems rather myopic by her comments.
Dadar - I am glad that you live in a glass house. His comments were crass, but they were said to another man in a private conversation. I've heard worse on a high school lunch table, I'm sure you have too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amynhop

Dadar

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2003
4,090
3,163
113
Dadar - I am glad that you live in a glass house. His comments were crass, but they were said to another man in a private conversation. I've heard worse on a high school lunch table, I'm sure you have too.
Are you riding bitcoin out?

Bloomberg just mentioned Saylor's Strategy is reporting this evening
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,313
2,948
113
These are the rules listed by On3 message board. No different than Rivals but nothing is ever enforced. Much like the NCAA and tampering. It’s not asking too much to disagree respectfully. Any man who addresses anyone, much less a woman, with that kind of vulgarity has a problem. Enough is enough. This ain’t the Wild Wild West. There has to be some type of governance.



You’re a liar. People insult me and after multiple times…I may return a small portion of the treatment I receive.

Rules didn’t post. There are clearly stated rules against these things.

That's all well and good, but you're a liar.

It's right here in this very thread, for all to see. Someone posted a thread, and wanted it to be non-political, on the non-political board.

YOU jumped in, and, unprompted, made it entirely political, going on a long-winded political rant ... and in your 2nd sentence, you insulted the crap out of people you don't agree with by calling them "so warped and brainwashed."

Then someone simply posted a crying gif ... and what did you do? Insulted their intelligence, then called them evil and invoked God and the end times.

So, again ... we're only 2 of your posts in, and we have a post about a band, where the thread starter hopes it's not going to turn political, and you immediately jump in, make it political and insult the crap out of a slew of people, calling them "warped and brainwashed" for their political views, we have only a crying gif posted in response, and that was enough to trigger you calling him, and those like him, evil, in the Biblical sense ... and hoping that they'll get theirs in the End times.

I mean, holy ****.

And it doesn't stop there. You then went on to say about a former MLBer who was quoted on the subject in question that he has "**** for brains," and then claimed those holding opposing political viewpoints are suffering from a mental disorder.

And that was before anyone insulted you, or called you names.

So, yeah, you're a liar. And a very bad one, too. Very mean-spirited and attacking. And you violated board rules many times before anyone else did.


So, apparently, it's OK for you to call people warped, brainwashed, evil, **** for brains, suffering from a mental disorder (simply for holding different political views), lacking in intelligence, and hoping for them to go to hell when End Times comes ... but it's not OK for someone, in a colorful way, to say you'd fit in with all the proven homophobic MAGAs who already populate this board and who come across the same way you do (but without all the religious theatrics) ... when he didn't even know you were a woman?

You're beyond a Karen. You're an evil, mutated hyper-devolved version of a Karen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan

Dadar

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2003
4,090
3,163
113
You obviously know nothing about the Bible. God uses sinners all the time. And that is all of us. We all deserve death. Saved by God’s grace and Jesus paying the price.
Sad how screwed up you are. Fox News and the maga rat holes has warped your ability to see facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

amynhop

Heisman
Nov 15, 2005
13,668
41,947
113
That's all well and good, but you're a liar.

It's right here in this very thread, for all to see. Someone posted a thread, and wanted it to be non-political, on the non-political board.

YOU jumped in, and, unprompted, made it entirely political, going on a long-winded political rant ... and in your 2nd sentence, you insulted the crap out of people you don't agree with by calling them "so warped and brainwashed."

Then someone simply posted a crying gif ... and what did you do? Insulted their intelligence, then called them evil and invoked God and the end times.

So, again ... we're only 2 of your posts in, and we have a post about a band, where the thread starter hopes it's not going to turn political, and you immediately jump in, make it political and insult the crap out of a slew of people, calling them "warped and brainwashed" for their political views, we have only a crying gif posted in response, and that was enough to trigger you calling him, and those like him, evil, in the Biblical sense ... and hoping that they'll get theirs in the End times.

I mean, holy ****.

And it doesn't stop there. You then went on to say about a former MLBer who was quoted on the subject in question that he has "**** for brains," and then claimed those holding opposing political viewpoints are suffering from a mental disorder.

And that was before anyone insulted you, or called you names.

So, yeah, you're a liar. And a very bad one, too. Very mean-spirited and attacking. And you violated board rules many times before anyone else did.


So, apparently, it's OK for you to call people warped, brainwashed, evil, **** for brains, suffering from a mental disorder (simply for holding different political views), lacking in intelligence, and hoping for them to go to hell when End Times comes ... but it's not OK for someone, in a colorful way, to say you'd fit in with all the proven homophobic MAGAs who already populate this board and who come across the same way you do (but without all the religious theatrics) ... when he didn't even know you were a woman?

You're beyond a Karen. You're an evil, mutated hyper-devolved version of a Karen.


If you think given the OP’s track record…he didn’t mean for it to be political…you too, have 💩for brains.