Tonight, a mockery was made of the Conerly Trophy and what it means. The award is SUPPOSED to go the "most outstanding football player in Mississippi". There is no doubt that Bo Wallace plays hard and helped OM win some games. However, he also had 19 TD passes to 15 INTS and led the SEC in turnovers. Furthermore, he apparently beat a guy who is one 3 finalists for the best defensive back in the country, the Jim Thorpe Award. He also is not even the best player on his own team. That award goes Donte Moncreif, who by the way, had much more to do with the big plays in the Egg Bowl and against LSU than Bo Wallace did. Wallace also, apparently, beat out an MSU QB that threw for 22 TDs and only 6 interceptions. Which by the way is 13 17ing less than Wallace.
So tonight, a mockery and disgrace was made of what should be reputable award. Not because Bo Wallace isn't a good player, but because others were much better players and more deserving choices for this award.
I blame this problem on the media and their inability to evaluate players or understand football. It is time for the Conerly award to be voted on, like the Ferris Award, by NFL scouts and talent evaluators; people who actually know what they are looking at. The media's voting for this award did not in anyway consider body of work, stats, or actual talent of the player. No, the media simply went with their emotions and voted for a guy who looked like he had a great Egg Bowl, although he still threw 2 interceptions, and with it robbed the Conerly Award of its integrity and legitimacy as a credible award.
So tonight, a mockery and disgrace was made of what should be reputable award. Not because Bo Wallace isn't a good player, but because others were much better players and more deserving choices for this award.
I blame this problem on the media and their inability to evaluate players or understand football. It is time for the Conerly award to be voted on, like the Ferris Award, by NFL scouts and talent evaluators; people who actually know what they are looking at. The media's voting for this award did not in anyway consider body of work, stats, or actual talent of the player. No, the media simply went with their emotions and voted for a guy who looked like he had a great Egg Bowl, although he still threw 2 interceptions, and with it robbed the Conerly Award of its integrity and legitimacy as a credible award.