Rutgers shows everyone where the green is

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
You don't think our number would go up if limit was moved to 80?
Do college sports-loving fish count? That's the 80 mile circle.. chock-full of dense bedroom communities.. look at all the urban (white on this map) areas..


and here's Austin.. do college-sports loving cattle count?


if anyone wants to look around themselves.. just change this link for your intended city and state... "https://milesofme.com/austin-tx/80"
 
Last edited:

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
You are the one cherrypicking. They used a round number of 50 miles, which would represent an hour or two car ride or rough tv coverage areas, and applied it to all teams. You picked one team and pointed out some markets a beyond the 50 miles. You also didn't provide what UT's numbers would be if you counted all that, my guess still far less than RU's. How about we take the positive news for RU and be happy and tout it?
@mdk01

using the tool here.. https://www.freemaptools.com/find-population.htm (note: first try returned error.. just ran it again and it came back in time to not cause an error)

Used 80-mile circles for New Brunswick and Austin

New Brunswick: The estimated population in the radius is 26,992,546

Austin: The estimated population in the radius is 3,971,719

27 million vs 4 million.

Does that settle it? Not cherry-picked, was it? Rutgers has all the cherries. Now we need the dollars. Rutgers is a brand that needs heavy investment and it could yield remarkable returns.

man, do I enjoy wielding the FACT-hammer.
 
Last edited:

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
@mdk01

using the tool here.. https://www.freemaptools.com/find-population.htm (note: first try returned error.. just ran it again and it came back in time to not cause an error)

Used 80-mile circles for New Brunswick and Austin

New Brunswick: The estimated population in the radius is 26,992,546

Austin: The estimated population in the radius is 3,971,719

27 million vs 4 million.

Does that settle it? Not cherry-picked, was it? Rutgers has all the cherries. Now we need the dollars. Rutgers is a brand that needs heavy investment and it could yield remarkable returns.

man, do I enjoy wielding the FACT-hammer.
No, we need the W’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satnom

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
No, we need the W’s.
The dollars are how you get the Ws.

The big-money programs invested very early.. probably getting near 100 years for some of them.. 50 years of investment even before the choice between D1A and D1AA in 1978.. that's when Rutgers decided it had to play with the Big Boys.

Now think of how several struggling (for them) big-money programs just threw cash at very successful coaches to get their programs "right".. Bama and Michigan for example.

It is the money.

Now.. Ws.. that can get you the money. But we shouldn't count on that. We need some real salespeople.. pharma babes.. to push this product and get the money we need for those Ws. With NIL (or brown-bag cheating before that).. money makes a HUGE difference.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUScrew85

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
@mdk01

using the tool here.. https://www.freemaptools.com/find-population.htm (note: first try returned error.. just ran it again and it came back in time to not cause an error)

Used 80-mile circles for New Brunswick and Austin

New Brunswick: The estimated population in the radius is 26,992,546

Austin: The estimated population in the radius is 3,971,719

27 million vs 4 million.

Does that settle it? Not cherry-picked, was it? Rutgers has all the cherries. Now we need the dollars. Rutgers is a brand that needs heavy investment and it could yield remarkable returns.

man, do I enjoy wielding the FACT-hammer.
The two of you are making stupid points! The number of people living near a sports franchise is meaningless. It's the number of fans. Texas easily has more fans in there 50 or 80 mile radius. The stupidity on here never ends
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
The two of you are making stupid points! The number of people living near a sports franchise is meaningless. It's the number of fans. Texas easily has more fans in there 50 or 80 mile radius. The stupidity on here never ends
That is what the OP posted and what was being discussed. I even already noted exactly what you said about the density of college sports fans being different. So why repeat what I said?

The topic is population within a 50-mile radius and the complaint was that it was cherry-picked and 80-miles would show different results. That was what was responded to.

You are way off-base complaining about the responses and it is your own stupidity you just put on display.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,166
24,782
113
You and your buddy weren't fighting availability but you waited too late. At some point they need to open up all the remaining seats for individual games sales. At that point you're mostly out of luck except really crappy seats.
I didn’t wait at all
I Assumed he applied right after he decided to go it alone
Maybe he did not
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
You are the one showing stupidity. The chart doesn't say fans, it says population.
We are talking about attendance not population. 2nd post in this thread! Try to keep up!!! I asked why we never sell out with the "great population" within 50 miles.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
We are talking about attendance not population. 2nd post in this thread! Try to keep up!!! I asked why we never sell out with the "great population" within 50 miles.
Your post was the 2nd post, not the OP post. You are suggesting that you hijacked the thread and that people should talk about what YOU said rather than the OP. And several people following your post, starting with the 4th post, did just that.

But the 3rd post, the one immediately after yours, did refer to the OP topic and article and ignored your spur.
A little cherry picking with those stats. UT is 80 minutes from San Antonio,. 2 hours from Houston and 2 1/2 hours from Dallas.

And then after people were done discussing your attendance thing.. THEN, after your branch off the OP ended, someone said THIS in reply to the 3rd post which had nothing to do with your chosen topic...

You are the one cherrypicking. They used a round number of 50 miles, which would represent an hour or two car ride or rough tv coverage areas, and applied it to all teams. You picked one team and pointed out some markets a beyond the 50 miles. You also didn't provide what UT's numbers would be if you counted all that, my guess still far less than RU's. How about we take the positive news for RU and be happy and tout it?

And then a whole bunch of replies, including mine, happened in this branch of the thread which applied DIRECTLY to the OP's topic and linked story and graphic.

What I have said above is FACT. What you said in criticizing others is your assertion only and is devoid of fact.

So, AGAIN, you show your ignorance. If people replied in the discussion of your hijacked topic then you would be correct. But that is NOT what happened.. Not until you decided to insult people for discussing the OP post.. not until you hijacked it again.

So, why are you so against people discussing a latent strength of Rutgers.. its location? No, ignore that question, please. That is just what you are begging for.. discussing your negativity and your chosen topic.
 
Last edited:

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
Your post was the 2nd post, not the OP post. You are suggesting that you hijacked the thread and that people should talk about what YOU said rather than the OP. And several people following your post, starting with the 4th post, did just that.

But the 3rd post, the one immediately after yours, did refer to the OP topic and article and ignored your spur.


And then after people were done discussing your attendance thing.. THEN, after your branch off the OP ended, someone said THIS in reply to the 3rd post which had nothing to do with your chosen topic...



And then a whole bunch of replies, including mine, happened in this branch of the thread which applied DIRECTLY to the OP's topic and linked story and graphic.

What I have said above is FACT. What you said in criticizing others is your assertion only and is devoid of fact.

So, AGAIN, you show your ignorance. If people replied in the discussion of your hijacked topic then you would be correct. But that is NOT what happened.. Not until you decided to insult people for discussing the OP post.. not until you hijacked it again.

So, why are you so against people discussing a latent strength of Rutgers.. its location? No, ignore that question, please. That is just what you are begging for.. discussing your negativity and your chosen topic.
A latent strength. How's that worked out??? Talk about ignorance!
 

JoeRU0304

Heisman
Nov 9, 2005
106,222
17,365
103
Oregon is the smallest market .. not sure what they bring other Phil Knight and his brand.
As e5fdny said winning is everything.
Our weekly TV viewership for RU football is only 600k fans nationwide. That’s 220k+ below Syracuse.
We are New York’s team let’s start playing like it.
It's been that way since the Big East days; cuse games tended to draw bigger national numbers while Rutgers games tended to draw bigger tri-state area numbers. I remember in 2011 on a Friday night ESPN/ESPN2 aired RU-UL and a cuse game (don't recall the opponents) on Friday night head-to-head. If I recall correctly the cuse game almost doubled RU-UL nationally while RU-UL almost doubled the cuse game in the NY/NJ metro area. I also remember seeing sometime in 2013 that over the past 10 seasons at that time RU had something like 8 of the 10 highest-rated games in the NY/NJ area that aired on ESPN channels.

Joe P.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet Jerry
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
It's been that way since the Big East days; cuse games tended to draw bigger national numbers while Rutgers games tended to draw bigger tri-state area numbers. I remember in 2011 on a Friday night ESPN/ESPN2 aired RU-UL and a cuse game (don't recall the opponents) on Friday night head-to-head. If I recall correctly the cuse game almost doubled RU-UL nationally while RU-UL almost doubled the cuse game in the NY/NJ metro area. I also remember seeing sometime in 2013 that over the past 10 seasons at that time RU had something like 8 of the 10 highest-rated games in the NY/NJ area that aired on ESPN channels.

Joe P.
Sewercuse is not located in the NYC/NJ area.

They may get higher ratings in Rochester or Buffalo compared to Rutgers
 

JoeRU0304

Heisman
Nov 9, 2005
106,222
17,365
103
Sewercuse is not located in the NYC/NJ area.

They may get higher ratings in Rochester or Buffalo compared to Rutgers
That was when cuse was heavily branding themselves as 'NY's college team' and advertising such in NYC. I still remember Rutgers-Howard at the Stadium outdrawing cuse-USC at the Meadowlands head-to-head at the gate by over 12,000+ fans in 2012.

Joe P.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
Sometimes the simplest answer (as brought forth by others ITT) is the correct one.

I’ve said before there is a difference between winning, WINing and WINing.

We’ve only done the first one and barely scratched with the second. If we ever get to the second level or God-willing the 3rd, it will happen.
^^^These^^^ thoughts of mine only consider physical attendance. Butts in the seats.

As for eyeballs and TV, even a good to great Rutgers could struggle in this dept. as we move forward.

We’ll see.🤷‍♂️
 

CollegeSenior

All-Conference
Apr 2, 2021
1,218
2,061
66
I spent most of my career working in NYC. Born and raised New Yorkers and NY transplants have no more interest in RU football than do Jerseyans have interest in Temple football. There’s casual interest but not much more.

MBB is a different story because of the interest in local rivals and schools
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiteBus

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
I spent most of my career working in NYC. Born and raised New Yorkers and NY transplants have no more interest in RU football than do Jerseyans have interest in Temple football. There’s casual interest but not much more.

MBB is a different story because of the interest in local rivals and schools
When you’re the only game in town and the product is good…

We have the first part covered. We really need to work on the second part though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scarletbergen

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
When you’re the only game in town and the product is good…

We have the first part covered. We really need to work on the second part though.
But we aren't the only game in town except Labor Day weekend. The next weekend we have to deal with the NFL.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
On Saturday?
From an all around media perspective, Rutgers Football takes a back seat, way back seat to the NFL. From an interest standpoint the same. Not many choose to invest in both College Football season tickets and pro football season tickets. Yes all that has an impact on going to a Rutgers game on a Saturday. Penn State, Nebraska, Iowa... do not have that issue. Those places truly are the only game in town. That's why they have strong fan bases.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,736
52,406
102
From an all-around media perspective, Rutgers Football takes a back seat, way back seat to the NFL. From an interest standpoint the same. Not many choose to invest in both College Football season tickets and pro football season tickets. Yes all that has an impact on going to a Rutgers game on a Saturday. Penn State, Nebraska, Iowa... do not have that issue. Those places truly are the only game in town. That's why they have strong fan bases.
And the W's to go along with it to get even the *casual fan interested.

* Which I think is who @ruinac was talking about? Win (as I mentioned in my post) and your Michael Strahan, David Wright types show up on your sideline. It becomes a thing.

But the points stands, right now Rutgers is the only P5 college game in town. No matter what it says on the calendar.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,017
37,430
113
From an all around media perspective, Rutgers Football takes a back seat, way back seat to the NFL. From an interest standpoint the same. Not many choose to invest in both College Football season tickets and pro football season tickets. Yes all that has an impact on going to a Rutgers game on a Saturday. Penn State, Nebraska, Iowa... do not have that issue. Those places truly are the only game in town. That's why they have strong fan bases.

Well…people actually want to see their team score touchdowns or have a chance to win.

A 55k stadium will be easily to fill out if we actually start winning.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
Well…people actually want to see their team score touchdowns or have a chance to win.

A 55k stadium will be easily to fill out if we actually start winning.
I think most everyone gets my original point. Population means nothing. Some are still struggling with that idea but they always do.
It's about winning and being entertaining.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,017
37,430
113
I think most everyone gets my original point. Population means nothing. Some are still struggling with that idea but they always do.
It's about winning and being entertaining.

Understood - and think you're mostly right.... but once we start winning, population will make a big difference in the money it will take to sustain and to build on the success. Our potential has never been brighter (or more attainable). Like every sports team in the area - everyone's a fan when theyre winning. Everyone finds something else to do when they're not.

I think its a good rebuttal to the athletic story "RU makes no sense in the big ten" (though Delany made the points himself in the article).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet Jerry

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,625
35,915
113
Or not a lot of Rutgers fans and sports fans in general. NYC residents probably are either not interested in sports or huge soccer fans.
nope
the RU experience sucks to be honest.

parking sucks, traffic sucks, the team sucks, expensive, kids in sports, etc etc

lots of reasons but a lack of fans is not one of them
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
nope
the RU experience sucks to be honest.

parking sucks, traffic sucks, the team sucks, expensive, kids in sports, etc etc

lots of reasons but a lack of fans is not one of them
Other teams over come most of that if you are entertaining and are competitive because they have nothing else
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
26,625
35,915
113
Other teams over come most of that if you are entertaining and are competitive because they have nothing else
key word competitive. we suck, I said that earlier and that is the driving force. People like winners, RU still hasn't figured out that if you want money, prestige, top students etc etc then you need to invest in and demand more from your flagship sport in the country's flagship conference.

we suck, no one wants to go
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,359
21,742
113
key word competitive. we suck, I said that earlier and that is the driving force. People like winners, RU still hasn't figured out that if you want money, prestige, top students etc etc then you need to invest in and demand more from your flagship sport in the country's flagship conference.

we suck, no one wants to go
Which has been my point all along. The OP was all about population and thought we were golden because of that. Stupid concept.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
A latent strength. How's that worked out??? Talk about ignorance!
You do understand what latent means, right?

"(of a quality or state) existing but not yet developed or manifest; hidden or concealed."

Yet again, your words define you.. "Talk about Ignorance!"

Are you sure you went to the same Rutgers that I went to?
 

Scarlet Jerry

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2001
4,208
2,456
0
nope
the RU experience sucks to be honest.

parking sucks, traffic sucks, the team sucks, expensive, kids in sports, etc etc

lots of reasons but a lack of fans is not one of them
I don't agree. Tell me the schools that play major college football where parking and traffic doesn't suck.
 

Scarlet Jerry

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2001
4,208
2,456
0
Which has been my point all along. The OP was all about population and thought we were golden because of that. Stupid concept.
Sorry, as the OP I never said that we were "golden" because of population, and it was not a stupid post. Tony Altimore is a very smart guy, and his data charts are the best out there. The point is that we are surrounded by people living in the NY metro area - and there are A LOT of them. In terms of being positioned for success and fan interest, this is a big factor IF the team is a winner. The data is striking. It's only one part of the equation, but it's a big deal. We just have to win consistently.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,113
11,878
113
It's been that way since the Big East days; cuse games tended to draw bigger national numbers while Rutgers games tended to draw bigger tri-state area numbers. I remember in 2011 on a Friday night ESPN/ESPN2 aired RU-UL and a cuse game (don't recall the opponents) on Friday night head-to-head. If I recall correctly the cuse game almost doubled RU-UL nationally while RU-UL almost doubled the cuse game in the NY/NJ metro area. I also remember seeing sometime in 2013 that over the past 10 seasons at that time RU had something like 8 of the 10 highest-rated games in the NY/NJ area that aired on ESPN channels.
A
Joe P.
Unfortunately Syracuse is still outdrawing RU significantly in weekly TV viewership. Last season 220k more people watched Syracuse than RU football. Year prior was even higher.. 400k more. We have a way too go.