Rutgers vs Michigan State - Prediction Thread
- Thread starter Tango Two
- Start date
Rutgers D gives the O a redzone turnover- 21
MSU's offense not nearly as good as Wisconsin's- 13
Recent history even when we're crap we still played well against MSU.
We'll make MSU one dimensional. Putting it all on the redshirt freshman's back.
MSU's offense not nearly as good as Wisconsin's- 13
Recent history even when we're crap we still played well against MSU.
We'll make MSU one dimensional. Putting it all on the redshirt freshman's back.
Last edited:
As we get closer to this game- I am having deja vu all over again. I sort of feel like I did for the VaTech game...
Everything football related points toward a Rutgers win...bu I am so used to losing these games over recent years- that I feel hesitant.
With that- I think it goes sort of the same as the VaTech game and I worried for nothing...I hope lol
Everything football related points toward a Rutgers win...bu I am so used to losing these games over recent years- that I feel hesitant.
With that- I think it goes sort of the same as the VaTech game and I worried for nothing...I hope lol
No one has ever said be BC or northwestern . You didn’t say it either , you said “traditionally better”.
Then I just pointed out that we have beat teams that were traditionally better.
Don’t know the Carter story but not sure if you noticed the KM almost always moves a pile forward…
RUTGERS 16 Michigan State 9 in front of announced crowd of 51,998 but peaking at 26,999 in the 2nd quarter dwindling to 12k by ghe end of 3rd
Thinking past 40 years.
This year it’s been 2 of 6 games with the pick-sixes that essentially ended any chance to win in both losses.
Fair enough over the past history. And you are correct, those two costly mistakes cost us a lot. The good thing- is that those mistakes are coming so much less frequent this year. And, MST has been super mistake prone this year.
Yeah for sure. Their RS freshman QB is better than and QB RU has had since Nova SMH
Congrats, wish I had gone moneyline. But it's still + $.
Bunch of folk, like me, had it as a 4-point win.
Bunch of folk had Rutgers scoring 27.
These people were closest with the 3-point win for Rutgers...
@RU-Hunter 24-21
@RUScrew85 20-17
@scarletrat 23-20 (but called for 2 OT, which is weird with the low score)
@RUGuitarMan 19-16
Think you have to give it to @RU-Hunter 3-point win, the highest score for Rutgers with that margin of victory.
Bunch of folk had Rutgers scoring 27.
These people were closest with the 3-point win for Rutgers...
@RU-Hunter 24-21
@RUScrew85 20-17
@scarletrat 23-20 (but called for 2 OT, which is weird with the low score)
@RUGuitarMan 19-16
Think you have to give it to @RU-Hunter 3-point win, the highest score for Rutgers with that margin of victory.
In what world? There were others who said 27-something nailing the win and Rutgers points.
I'd say order of priority is..
1 WINNING TEAM
2 MARGIN OF VICTORY
3 Correct Points Scored for each team
Many people got 1
- fewer got 2
-- no one got 3 but my choice was the closest of those who passed the other two tests
@Nycrusupporter had 27-20.. has you beat even if you wanted to come up with a different system than mine.
Hmm.. your handle is newell.. does that mean you played for Rutgers.. you do get points for that.
Last edited: