I don't think the baby killers protesting now will be rioting but I do believe radical groups like Antifa will proxy riot for them.
SCOTUS Leaker
- Thread starter Fight On Era
- Start date
^^^^ That's right! Walgreens must be punished with massive looting for trying to have businesses and employ people in Blue states and cities.
How dare they!
How dare they!
Bad week for the Crypt-Keeper.
First her house draws leftist protesters, then the Archbishop cuts off her free Sunday wine-tasting.
Trouble in Paradise.
She and her hubby's dirty insider trading dealings to buy Tesla stock got hammered when Tesla lost almost half of its value. I wonder if the drunkard Pelosi was behind trying to get liquor shipments sent to Congress? Sounds like something she'd do and then stick taxpayers with the bill
Well, this was predictable. Crazy California liberal got arrested at Judge Kavanaugh's Maryland home with weapons and burglary equipment that he says he intended to use to murder the Supreme Court Justice over Roe vs Wade leaked opinion written by Justice Alito. How does fake news liberal media respond? By giving the street and location of Kavanaugh's home. This is a dangerous game the liberals are playing with our country and it has to STOP 
It's reckless and irresponsible. The leaker must be arrested and prosecuted like yesterday!
It's reckless and irresponsible. The leaker must be arrested and prosecuted like yesterday!
And Chuck Schumer needs to be held responsible for his statements threatening that Kavanaugh would “reap the whirlwind”. He is inciting violence, and this kind of crap needs to stop.Well, this was predictable. Crazy California liberal got arrested at Judge Kavanaugh's Maryland home with weapons and burglary equipment that he says he intended to use to murder the Supreme Court Justice over Roe vs Wade leaked opinion written by Justice Alito. How does fake news liberal media respond? By giving the street and location of Kavanaugh's home. This is a dangerous game the liberals are playing with our country and it has to STOP
Schumer is another moron in office for way too long. "I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price." Protected by free speech but who cares if it is because democrats never reciprocate with the same courtesy as they are afforded no matter how stupid and reckless the speech.
An assassination attempt is made on a SCOTUS Justice, something that is more dangerous to democracy than Jan. 6 ever was, and The NY Times buries it.
Even staunch leftie Bill Maher is calling them out for it.
www.foxnews.com
smh
Even staunch leftie Bill Maher is calling them out for it.
Bill Maher buries NYT for burying Kavanaugh assassination attempt: 'They wear their bias on their sleeves'
"Real Time" host Bill Maher blasted The New York Times for snubbing the assassination attempt of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh off the front page.
www.foxnews.com
smh
He's right. We all know had that been a MAGA person caught planning an assassination against an activist libby Justice they would be riding that story for years.An assassination attempt is made on a SCOTUS Justice, something that is more dangerous to democracy than Jan. 6 ever was, and The NY Times buries it.
Even staunch leftie Bill Maher is calling them out for it.
Bill Maher buries NYT for burying Kavanaugh assassination attempt: 'They wear their bias on their sleeves'
"Real Time" host Bill Maher blasted The New York Times for snubbing the assassination attempt of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh off the front page.
smh
Another glaring example of how the MSM is the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and the enemy of the people.
Makes perfect sense the Marxists would fan the flames to encourage violence on Conservative SCOTUS Justices.
Eliminate one or two and now Brandon can have the SCOTUS majority his puppeteers covet.
Eliminate one or two and now Brandon can have the SCOTUS majority his puppeteers covet.
And after the Senate unanimously passed a bill to provide protection for the SCOTUS justices, the house Dems realize what an opportunity this is for them to tip the balance of the SCOTUS back toward them and vote it down.
Sick people.
Sick people.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
They are flat out evil.
There is no reconciliation possible.
They are flat out evil.
There is no reconciliation possible.
I haven’t followed this story. Of course we are going to protect all the Supremes. We have no alternative, even if Congress is acting childish.
I don’t think so. Riots backfired on the Democrats the last time they tried that trick.
My apologies for a stupid question. Was the leaker identified? Or did the mostly socialist media sweep the story under the carpet?
In all seriousness, which of you would force your wife, daughter, or other family member to cary a baby full term in the case of rape?
That’s an extremely tough question to answer so I will only say that I know a lady who was brought into life in exactly that way. She now has several children of her own. Because of her experience she is a very strong advocate for all the unborn. She’s proof that we don’t need to kill an innocent baby just because they have one terrible parent. She’s so thankful she was given the opportunity to live her life and become such a positive impact on many people.
I realize it’s a tough question, but that is my point. It should not be our decision as far as what a woman does in that kind of situation. I could understand most other situations, but in the case of rape or incest, I don’t believe that we have the right to decide for a woman on those type of situations.
As shane2020 said, that’s extremely tough to answer. I can say that I would not “force”, or put undo pressure on them to do anything, but I would advise them to choose life. What it comes down to is that it’s not the baby’s fault, he/she did not do anything to deserve death. I don’t have daughters, but I guarantee my wife would choose life even under those circumstances. I can also say that I would not judge nor condemn anybody who went through something like that for their decision.
But that’s not where most of the political debate is. I’m not hearing the pro-abortion people saying that they only want abortion legal in the case of incest and rape. Nearly all want it unrestricted and convenient.
The political debate is equally entrenched and intransigent on both sides, my friend.
I’m personally, in my private life, against abortion. My wife got pregnant the last time, at 38 years old, delivered at 39. They offered to do a test because there was good chance the baby we would born with Downs Syndrome. We never considered it, so she never even took the test.
Meanwhile, my Trump loving, Bible thumping sister had zero problem having an abortion at the same age when she took the test and found out her baby would be born with Downs.
I’m anti abortion, but Pro Choice, for others. That’s the way it should be IMO. My biggest problem with the anti abortion people is they give zero Fvcks about the babies after they’re born.
I can see where that image might come from Blem, as there have been some poorly thought out methods of angry anti-abortion protesting in the past. And the pro-abortion lobby, especially Planned Parenthood, are consistent in their message that all pro-life people couldn’t care less about the mother or the baby, especially after the birth.
But their message is just not true. The vast majority of pro-life people do care very much about what happens to both mother and baby after the birth.
Those women’s care centers that are being fire bombed right now in the wake of the SCOTUS leak do just that. That is their purpose, to give a mother options, and to care for her and her child before, during, and after the birth. They partner with local churches, businesses, and volunteers to provide what the mother and child need.
To give an example, there is a young minority lady who now goes to my church who got unexpectedly pregnant a few years ago. The father was nowhere to be found, she was confused as to what to do, and she was distraught, as many in her situation are. She thought that her only realistic option was to terminate the pregnancy, as that’s what she was hearing from her family and friends.
As she was walking up to Planned Parenthood to arrange for the abortion, an older woman out on the sidewalk smiled and approached, introduced herself, and told her that there were other options available to her besides terminating the pregnancy. She gave her a flyer for a local Women’s Care Center with a list of their services. The young lady decided to think about it and left.
She went to the Women’s Care Center a few days later, where they gave her a free ultrasound. Upon seeing her baby on the screen, she says she knew immediately that she could not go through with an abortion, and she wanted to keep the baby. The stats I’m hearing are that 4 out of 5 women that are seeking an abortion change their mind and choose life for their baby after seeing him/her on an ultrasound.
From that point on, they assisted her with medical care and check ups, and after the baby was delivered, they provided her with basic necessities, including shelter, food, and diapers, all from donations to the Women’s Care Center.
Today, this young lady works at a local business in a clerical job arranged by the Women’s Care Center through a local church, and has a beautiful young toddler who she says is the sunshine of her home. She also volunteers at the Women’s Care Center to help others who just need to talk to someone who has been through what they are going through. And she says she thanks God for sending that older woman to her in front of Planned Parenthood. Her and that woman are good friends now, and spend time together.
This is not a rare story, this is happening more and more as women are learning what their options are and that there IS help available to them. Most don’t need as much help as this young lady did, but some do.
Planned Parenthood and the pro-abortion lobby would like everyone to think that pro-life people don’t care about the baby after it’s born, and that’s their consistent message. But it’s just not true.
Nice story. But my point still stands. One story, or even 100 feel good stories don’t change the fact that in general, the anti abortion people don’t give two hoots about these babies after they are born. I think it’s sad that there are so many babies aborted every year. I think it’s sad when one baby is aborted. But I still believe it’s a decision for the mother, to a certain extent, the father, and the woman’s physician. I also shouldn’t have said they don’t care about the babies. That wasn’t really what I meant, that’s my bad. For the most part, they don’t care about what happens to these babies further down the road.
Nonetheless, it’s been my experience that your impression of them is incorrect. I can say that every pro-life person that I know, and I know a great many, definitely does care what happens down the road with both the baby and the mother.
And I can say with even more certainty that none of the pro-abortion people gives two hoots about what happens to the baby.
And Planned Parenthood cares nothing about the mother or the baby. My sister was a counselor there years ago, and she was given strict instructions not to present any alternatives to abortion. That’s where they make their money.
Last edited:
Do you mean like trying to convict a sitting POTUS based on a pure hoax?
You mean that kind of rationale of winning at all costs including falsely prosecuting a POTUS?
You mean like orchestrating and propagandizing an "insurrection" to try to again create a sham prosecution of an ex-POTUS?
Time to open one's eyes and realize what they are - Evil.
Murder is not beyond their MO if they can fan the flames and get some useful idiot to do their dirty work.
Well, we’re all sinners so that sort of means we all have evil potential.
All the things you list are not the same as killing a Supreme or two to take control of that court. I do not believe the vast majority of Americans, from either party, would condone an assassination like that. However I lived through the ‘60s when JFK, RFK and MLK were all assassinated so I can’t completely rule it out.
Then we have the troubling Clinton Body Count that defies all the statistical odds…
Last edited:
I think he is saying that if the US and the antiabortion people are pro-life, and codify it BY LAW, then the country needs to provide financial
assistance for caring for the baby, BY LAW. Perhaps provide support right through college. If the state says you must carry a child to term, then the state must provide for that child with money and support systems as long as it takes.
If gay marriage isn’t protected in the constitution then why should SCOTUS have any say in the matter? It’s called rule of law and it has nothing to do with what you think should be protected universally.
Pretty sure that is exactly the system we already have in place...the providing care/financial system part.
Free preschool, free childcare, free food and shelter, clothes, free college?
I don’t think that is true.
Well, the socialists would sure like that level of Big Brother control.
Depends on how you define control. If you are going to force pregnancies to term, then isn’t that a fairly high level of control?
My daughter is adopted from birth. The birth mother voluntarily carried her full term and I'm extremely grateful that she did. It would be hard to find a more beautiful woman inside and out than my daughter.
You are kinda stupid.
it only took you five weeks to come up with this childish response. I hope your delicate ego got the boost you were looking for. Try not to hurt your hand as you pat yourself on the back.Um, all those things are provided free of charge for a needy family.
If they qualify, ever single item on on your list is free.
Granted, I should clarify by saying I have only lived in 2 states, Idaho and California, and in those 2 states all those things are free and covered if you are poor.
If not, why should it be covered?
