Agree 100%.and that to me includes the entire athletic department not just Julie, the whole lot then
Agree 100%.and that to me includes the entire athletic department not just Julie, the whole lot then
and that to me includes the entire athletic department not just Julie, the whole lot then
Just to make sure I get your point. You would be ok sticking with an AD that screwed up but the coach she oversees has to go for screwing up? Again, not saying she did anything wrong just asking?
people better hope that Julie isn't implicated in the second investigation along with Flood as it will not only impact our football search but hurt every other program and fundraising as we conduct an AD search as well. Not good for an athletic department struggling to nibble at incredibly wide gap between themselves and the rest of the Big 10 in infrastructure. Not to mention the long and protracted AD search that will be dissected. Just food for thought for those who want to blow the whole thing up. Careful what you wish for.
But meanwhile, UNC Chapel Hill keeps rolling along.
You know I've always supported her and hoped she did well. No, I don't hold her responsible for all of Flood's issues, especially recruiting and coaching. That being said, she isn't doing well enough to keep around simply because you don't want to upset the apple cart.well we don't have the report do we so everything is speculation, we don't know exactly everything that goes down and how things are presented. If Julie screwed up in that's its firable yes she should go. I don't know enough and I don't think anyone on this board knows enough to say automatically because Flood didn't do this that then Julie is also responsible because we don't know how things are going down and what is said in the investigation
Flood needs to go for many reasons. First is the performance on the field but then take in poor recruiting, email fiasco and other possible problems. Are you saying Julie is responsible for ALL his issues, not her hire. She is responsible for oversight and that's what could get her in trouble.
But since everyone wants Flood gone, I would think everyone better hope that Julie gets cleared too because then we have a real mess on our hands with no AD to hire the coach or oversee the other sports and then have to go through a protracted search. That's all Im saying. I think there are those just wishing to get rid of Julie to either clean the slate or because they never liked her in the first place
I like Julie and don't have anything against her just listening and reading the tea leaves
You ever call the IRS and ask them to audit you just to prove you pay enough in taxes? Every hire a PI simply because you know your wife is faithful? Go through your teenage kids crap because you don't think they are smoking weed? Didn't think so.......personally I think this investigation is being undertaken to prove that nothing wrong has been done--NOT to find the wrong doing that is believed to have happened--I expect that nothing will come of it but if it does we need to clean house
You and I are usually on the same page when it comes to RU football. This post however, is so far from reality, I don't know what to say. Other posters above me have mentions how we "dodged a bullet" for not hiring Frazier. I can assure you, JH is doing just fine. Oh, and Frazier didn't hire Rod Carey. That was the previous AD.Should have been our last hire. I know people in power read these boards and it's time to right that wrong. As a bonus, he can bring Rod Carey with him and we can start fresh.
Where was this clean house attitude when TP was let go? I was fine keeping him or letting him go but most here and still some now were very adamant about keeping him. Again like I mentioned in another thread inconsistency of reaction by some here just like with FHJ and not letting him go at first or Rice and firing him without cause. No one dinged TP for that but so many were wanting to ding JH if he didn't let Flood go. Have any opinion you like but be consistent and not have a double standard. BTW should add this isn't specifically referring to you but the board in general.I am not hoping for anything, but just saying that if they are cleaning house and checking closets for skeletons, everyone should get equal treatment regardless of their title, their length of tenure or the consequences on the athletic department or Rutgers. Thinking like that netted us our current head football coach. If someone was hired to clean things up and they did not do their job, they should be shown the door.
You know I've always supported her and hoped she did well. No, I don't hold her responsible for all of Flood's issues, especially recruiting and coaching. That being said, she isn't doing well enough to keep around simply because you don't want to upset the apple cart.
Instead of quoting everyone I'll just make one post.
Yes, I'm aware of the underage bowl party. I believe it is a dead issue and he didn't get much heat for it.
I know he didn't hire Carey but it doesn't mean he can't bring him along. I'll worry about his hiring skills when we cross that bridge.
He should have been our last hire because he was most qualified except for being straight.
I don't believe he had sexual harassment issues. You are thinking of the stoney brook guy.
I like Julie and don't have anything against her just listening and reading the tea leaves
I generally see things like this too.I'm curious what tea leaves you are reading.
I have a friend who is pretty tied in at the Athletic Dept (but not as tied in as he was when Pernetti was here). He hears a lot of negative stuff about Julie and seems to think that Julie and Flood will be fired together.
But I also know that a lot of his sources are people who are still hung up on Pernetti and don't like Julie for a variety of reasons. And since some of the stuff he has heard from these sources in the past has turned out to be false, I think a lot of what he hears is sour grapes and false rumors.
I hear from others that Julie is regarded well by the top university administration and is expected to lead any changes in the football program. So barring some bombshell, I'd be really surprised if she's not AD next September. (And sure, the bombshell could come from the current investigation. But there is nothing to suggest that there will be a bombshell.)
but that's what we do hear at Rutgers, never about circling the wagons, its always about trying to find the cheapest way out of a mess which actually causes a worse problem
Flood just be fired for on field results, no need to go through investigations to try and fire him for cause because you might not like whats dug up. Fire him and pay him the $ like other schools do it but no this school always will have something blow up in its face
To me it would depend on how bad the screw up is.Just to make sure I get your point. You would be ok sticking with an AD that screwed up but the coach she oversees has to go for screwing up? Again, not saying she did anything wrong just asking?
few different places; some work inside the department, some have great connections, while others are big money boosters. My personal belief is that if Flood takes a buyout all stays quiet and JH returns. If he forces their hand and the report becomes exhibit A than she becomes collateral damage. Obviously, I haven't seen the report but if what I'm told is in it is it's not a good look. To be honest, it's crap that happens everywhere but coupled with arrests and the professor incident it becomes a pattern. I also think the decision would have huge implications on who the next coach is and the type of team we become.I'm curious what tea leaves you are reading.
I have a friend who is pretty tied in at the Athletic Dept (but not as tied in as he was when Pernetti was here). He hears a lot of negative stuff about Julie and seems to think that Julie and Flood will be fired together.
But I also know that a lot of his sources are people who are still hung up on Pernetti and don't like Julie for a variety of reasons. And since some of the stuff he has heard from these sources in the past has turned out to be false, I think a lot of what he hears is sour grapes and false rumors.
I hear from others that Julie is regarded well by the top university administration and is expected to lead any changes in the football program. So barring some bombshell, I'd be really surprised if she's not AD next September. (And sure, the bombshell could come from the current investigation. But there is nothing to suggest that there will be a bombshell.)
Which unfortunately puts Al Golden more in play as I've said before.few different places; some work inside the department, some have great connections, while others are big money boosters. My personal belief is that if Flood takes a buyout all stays quiet and JH returns. If he forces their hand and the report becomes exhibit A than she becomes collateral damage. Obviously, I haven't seen the report but if what I'm told is in it is it's not a good look. To be honest, it's crap that happens everywhere but coupled with arrests and the professor incident it becomes a pattern. I also think the decision would have huge implications on who the next coach is and the type of team we become.
At the time, I felt he had the best resume of all our applicants from P5 schools. I was intrigued by the stoney brook guy but that was because he was known as a huge fundraiser. I like that he was from the B1G and although I don't recall specifics I remember him having been given credit for the job he did . Since going to UNIBut there is no "why" in this post either. You just say you are aware of his "issues," you recognize he didn't hire their successful football coach, and has nothing to do with that program's success, and you recognize you have no knowledge of his hiring skills. Then you say again that we should have hired him.
Why should we have hired him? Why is he more qualified than Julie?
Which unfortunately puts Al Golden more in play as I've said before.
The fact that its being called "his" program is outrageous. No other P5 program wanted to touch him because of his issues.
Listen. Ill admit it I was wrong. I wanted him over JH based on resume at the time of JH's hire. But since the hire and the info that has come out on both of them RU made the right choice.
My personal belief is that if Flood takes a buyout all stays quiet and JH returns. If he forces their hand and the report becomes exhibit A than she becomes collateral damage.
We dodged a bullet, then with all of Hermanns faults and miscues, got hit with a grenade.You and I are usually on the same page when it comes to RU football. This post however, is so far from reality, I don't know what to say. Other posters above me have mentions how we "dodged a bullet" for not hiring Frazier. I can assure you, JH is doing just fine. Oh, and Frazier didn't hire Rod Carey. That was the previous AD.
Sorry. We'll just have to agree to disagree.We dodged a bullet, then with all of Hermanns faults and miscues, got hit with a grenade.
I would have taken the bullet.
Not sure I follow.....This makes no sense.
If Flood is fired without cause, then Rutgers pays him the buyout. There is no hand to force. He doesn't get to turn down the buyout and challenge the reason he was fired. The whole point of firing him without cause is that there doesn't need to be a reason to fire him. There is no justification; there is no Exhibit A.
I've gone back and forth about this and I'm not a lawyer but I'd imagine there are ways of getting around FOIA, especially regarding legal issues. Again, my sources could all be 100% wrong and there could be no smoke, no fire, and everyone will still be employed November 30th. Someone asked me a question and I gave a response.Vk this is impossible to keep quiet we are a state university the documents will be public domain.
Sure, they made a list of those most qualified, and Julie was not on the list.A lot of money was paid to report on who would be the most qualified AD. Switching ADs now would be like throwing that money out the window...
The likely reality is the report will be a read that would make Cheech and Chong blush. I still can't believe the bozos we have running this place are going out of their way to bring this on top of everything else we've been through.people better hope that Julie isn't implicated in the second investigation along with Flood as it will not only impact our football search but hurt every other program and fundraising as we conduct an AD search as well. Not good for an athletic department struggling to nibble at incredibly wide gap between themselves and the rest of the Big 10 in infrastructure. Not to mention the long and protracted AD search that will be dissected. Just food for thought for those who want to blow the whole thing up. Careful what you wish for.
Vk this is impossible to keep quiet we are a state university the documents will be public domain.
I agree with this.The likely reality is the report will be a read that would make Cheech and Chong blush. I still can't believe the bozos we have running this place are going out of their way to bring this on top of everything else we've been through.
If that report does show the cover up of rampant recreational drug use, I can't imagine either survive. Sad thing is, Julie was finding her way and having some success with other programs. Politi seems to have finally calmed down and given up his crusade against her. For the first time since she was hired, it was starting to look like it might all wind up ok, after all.
All sounds good so as I usually do I did a quick lookup to see who was there before Frazier and see if I could find out what he did. He was there from 2008 so he definitely hired Doeren/Carey and might have hired Kill.At the time, I felt he had the best resume of all our applicants from P5 schools. I was intrigued by the stoney brook guy but that was because he was known as a huge fundraiser. I like that he was from the B1G and although I don't recall specifics I remember him having been given credit for the job he did . Since going to UNI
Since his arrival at NIU, Frazier has been firmly committed to Huskie Athletics' future with a particular focus on improved facilities to remain competitive on a national level. In 2014-15, two major announcements provided a road map. In October, Frazier presented the NIU Athletics Facilities Master Plan, the first facilities master plan for the department since 1991. During his tenure at NIU, he completed the installation of a new football turf field; on-campus indoor tennis practice courts; new and improved men's & women's soccer locker rooms; and unveiled a new basketball court and design. In May, he introduced a new departmental Strategic Plan, which detailed the mission, vision, core values and critical issues for the next three years.
Frazier brought four new head coaches to NIU in 2014-15 to lead the Huskie women's tennis, baseball, women's cross country and women's basketball programs. Frazier also has made football scheduling a top priority, signing home-and-home football agreements with San Diego State, BYU, Utah, Maryland, Tulsa, Vanderbilt, Boston College and South Florida.
In two years leading NIU Athletics, Frazier has worked tirelessly to engage the campus and local communities, expand the Huskies' fan base and connect with alumni across Chicagoland and beyond. He instituted the Huskie Summer Circuit, bringing coaches and staff to four sites throughout the region to meet and interact with fans while promoting NIU and Huskie Athletics.
After introducing the new Coaches Club at Huskie Stadium for 2014 to great reviews, NIU opened the new End Zone Club in 2015. Basketball's courtside seats have sold out for two years in a row and sales in the Convocation Center's premium area, the Nelson Club, continue to grow. Frazier also initiated "The Yard", the official pregame tailgate area for NIU football, which made its debut in 2014.
Fans have responded, as the Huskie Athletic Fund collected more than $1 million in cash gifts for the first time in 2014 and the annual fund grew by 24 percent. NIU also signed a new multimedia and sponsorship partnership with Learfield Sports, while the NIU Convocation Center, which became a part of Intercollegiate Athletics in 2013, attracted popular acts like Brad Paisley, Casting Crowns, Second City, and Monster Trucks to the area.
All sounds good so as I usually do I did a quick lookup to see who was there before Frazier ...
Well if it becomes necessary I'd look at him before Frazier, haha.So you're saying we should have hired Jeff Compher?
[winking]