SEC going to 9 conference games starting in 2026

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
5,247
1,438
113
I'm ok with OM and UK. However I hate playing aTm. It's not an interesting game ever, at least to me.

State v Bama is one of the longest running "rivalry" in conference history. We should play them.

Even if we don't, the sec will give us UGA or Texas or Florida. So may as well play Bama.
Again, there's no chance that Georgia is one of our permanents. None at all. They are a lock for Auburn and Florida, and their third will either be South Carolina, Kentucky, or Vanderbilt. Literally 0% they pass up on all 3 of those to take us.

I think Texas A&M-Mississippi State and Texas-Arkansas are likely matchups, but it's also possible that they flip those to Texas-Mississippi State and Texas A&M-Arkansas, so I'll say Texas is a maybe, not probably not.

Florida? Not happening, if they get a "low tier" opponent, it will be South Carolina, Kentucky, or Vanderbilt, not us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon13

TheDawg-Pound

Member
Dec 21, 2024
247
159
43
Going by recent success, why does ole miss get an easier schedule than us. We should have- ole miss, ark, ky

Never mind. I know. We just let them screw us just like the current two years of the hardest schedule then it changes format again so we don't get the rewarded easier schedule the next two years.
 

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
7,796
6,693
113
Going by recent success, why does ole miss get an easier schedule than us. We should have- ole miss, ark, ky

Never mind. I know. We just let them screw us just like the current two years of the hardest schedule then it changes format again so we don't get the rewarded easier schedule the next two years.
Season 3 Episode 304 GIF by Rick and Morty
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
5,247
1,438
113
I've been looking around SEC message boards this afternoon, and every fanbase is saying some variation of "obviously we're going to be the one who gets screwed because the SEC hates us."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MSUDOG24

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,515
1,034
108
All I see is 3 wins every year. And everyone wants us as one of their permanent games.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
10,505
9,824
113
Alabama doesn't want us. There's a 100% chance they get Auburn and Tennessee, and if LSU doesn't work out for whatever reason, the networks will want to match them with another big name like Texas or Oklahoma.

I won't say it's a 0% chance like Georgia because there's at least some history there, but it's unlikely
Why do you keep talking anout who wants us? Of course they want us, we’re an easy win most of the time. They don’t give a 17 about the TV, they want to win. They get the same money no matter who they play and are already saddled with enough hard opponents.

I hope, truly, that the list you linked is right, but that’s just the initial rumors. It’s hard for me to imagine they make all the blue bloods play each other and then let all the little brothers play each other.

Bama would still play LSU twice every four years.

I think you can dang near take it to the bank that we will get Alabama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBleedMaroonDawg

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
53,079
20,196
113
Sounds like ESPN finally got the money right.

Glad to see it, although it was definitely inevitable.
I think more likely SEC and ESPN pushed each other to the brink & SEC finally caved. An 8-game schedule with only 1 permanent opponent was never going to happen. The flip side of 2024-2025 schedules was never an option and ESPN knew it.
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
725
987
93
Guys, there’s no way ESPN is going to allow for State-Bama, State-LSU, State-UGa to be an annual game. We were always going to get OM and two mids. The question is what combo of UK/Ark/A&M is it going to be. Ole Miss’ resurgence under Kiffin, makes it much easier to justify now.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
9,314
8,943
113
So… we have Washington State on our 2030 & 2031 schedules. They’re no longer considered a “Power” opponent. That means we’re very likely either going to have to buy those games out or keep them and add a Big Ten/Big 12/ACC opponent unless we get some waiver from the league.
 

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
4,346
6,447
113
So… we have Washington State on our 2030 & 2031 schedules. They’re no longer considered a “Power” opponent. That means we’re very likely either going to have to buy those games out or keep them and add a Big Ten/Big 12/ACC opponent unless we get some waiver from the league.
I don’t think they are that strict about it. BYU has served as our “power” non-con in the past when they were independent. Washington State is Ole Miss’s “power” non-con this season.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
5,247
1,438
113
So the rumor/"inside info" from a couple years ago is that the schedules would be made like this:

Higher prestige teams - Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU Oklahoma, Texas, Texas A&M
Lower prestige teams - Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt

Everyone would get 2 permanent opponents in their own tier and 1 permanent in the other tier. So in the higher tier, the matchups might be:
  • Oklahoma-Texas
  • Texas-Texas A&M
  • Texas A&M-LSU
  • LSU-Alabama (highest rated TV game)
  • Alabama-Auburn
  • Auburn-Georgia
  • Georgia-Florida
  • Florida-Oklahoma (this one is kinda random, but Oklahoma has to get somebody)
And these could the permanent matchups in the lower tier. (The Tweet I had earlier was a little different in the former East teams)
  • Missouri-Arkansas
  • Arkansas-Ole Miss
  • Ole Miss-Mississippi State
  • Mississippi State-Kentucky
  • Kentucky-Vanderbilt
  • Vanderbilt-Tennessee
  • Tennessee-South Carolina
  • South Carolina-Missouri
And finally, these may be the cross-tier permanents:
  • Alabama-Tennessee
  • LSU-Ole Miss
  • Texas-Arkansas (could be Texas A&M-Arkansas instead)
  • Texas A&M-Mississippi State
  • Oklahoma-Missouri
  • Georgia-South Carolina
  • Florida-Kentucky
  • Auburn-Vanderbilt (they deserve a break after getting Alabama and Georgia as their other 2)
You can swap a few of these around, but this is the mindset they are most likely going to use unless something has changed. And what has changed? Tennessee really sticks out as a "lower prestige" team now - they kinda did a couple years ago, and they really do now. So who moves down into the lower tier? Texas A&M? Oklahoma? Either of those cascades a bunch of changes throughout the above,
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
17,235
10,764
113
This is a sign the playoff is being expanded. There will be no undefeated teams in the SEC. Most teams will have two or more losses every year. You don't have to look far past last season on how many SEC teams that could have made a go of it in the playoff got left out because they had two loses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

$altyDawg

Active member
Aug 30, 2018
1,231
457
83
Buckle up and get ready to take your licks. It will be Bama, LSU, and Ole Miss.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
9,314
8,943
113
I don’t think they are that strict about it. BYU has served as our “power” non-con in the past when they were independent. Washington State is Ole Miss’s “power” non-con this season.
Fair. The article I read specifically said “one additional high-quality nonconference opponent from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season”, but you’re right, there’s probably some leeway there.

Would be kinda cool if we added Texas Tech those seasons and then Texas Tech scheduled Washington State. We could have a Mike Leach round robin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSUDOG24

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
53,079
20,196
113
So the rumor/"inside info" from a couple years ago is that the schedules would be made like this:

Higher prestige teams - Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU Oklahoma, Texas, Texas A&M
Lower prestige teams - Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt

Everyone would get 2 permanent opponents in their own tier and 1 permanent in the other tier. So in the higher tier, the matchups might be:
  • Oklahoma-Texas
  • Texas-Texas A&M
  • Texas A&M-LSU
  • LSU-Alabama (highest rated TV game)
  • Alabama-Auburn
  • Auburn-Georgia
  • Georgia-Florida
  • Florida-Oklahoma (this one is kinda random, but Oklahoma has to get somebody)
And these could the permanent matchups in the lower tier. (The Tweet I had earlier was a little different in the former East teams)
  • Missouri-Arkansas
  • Arkansas-Ole Miss
  • Ole Miss-Mississippi State
  • Mississippi State-Kentucky
  • Kentucky-Vanderbilt
  • Vanderbilt-Tennessee
  • Tennessee-South Carolina
  • South Carolina-Missouri
And finally, these may be the cross-tier permanents:
  • Alabama-Tennessee
  • LSU-Ole Miss
  • Texas-Arkansas (could be Texas A&M-Arkansas instead)
  • Texas A&M-Mississippi State
  • Oklahoma-Missouri
  • Georgia-South Carolina
  • Florida-Kentucky
  • Auburn-Vanderbilt (they deserve a break after getting Alabama and Georgia as their other 2)
You can swap a few of these around, but this is the mindset they are most likely going to use unless something has changed. And what has changed? Tennessee really sticks out as a "lower prestige" team now - they kinda did a couple years ago, and they really do now. So who moves down into the lower tier? Texas A&M? Oklahoma? Either of those cascades a bunch of changes throughout the above,
This is pretty close to how it will be.
 

TheBannerM

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2024
725
987
93
The SEC already went through this exercise in 2023 when they first debated 8 or 9 game schedules - they ultimately went with 8 because the CFP announced it would expand to 12 and they wanted to see how it went.

I went back and looked and the leaked SEC 3-team permanent opponents for State were OM, Ark and A&M. I don't see that changing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
53,079
20,196
113
The SEC already went through this exercise in 2023 when they first debated 8 or 9 game schedules - they ultimately went with 8 because the CFP announced it would expand to 12 and they wanted to see how it went.

I went back and looked and the leaked SEC 3-team permanent opponents for State were OM, Ark and A&M. I don't see that changing.
Everyone needs to read this post. This decision was made 2 years ago. All they did for 24 & 25 was drop 1 rotating team to get to 8 games.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
10,505
9,824
113
I think you will see a scheduling alliance with the B10
Don't see how they'd do that. Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky and Florida are pretty locked into the ACC.

Of course two of those may soon be in the B1G or SEC, but that's still a number of years away.
 

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
4,298
6,457
113
Fair. The article I read specifically said “one additional high-quality nonconference opponent from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season”, but you’re right, there’s probably some leeway there.

Would be kinda cool if we added Texas Tech those seasons and then Texas Tech scheduled Washington State. We could have a Mike Leach round robin.
I think we still have WSU scheduled for a home and away in a few years - hope that counts
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
4,642
5,207
113
Guys, there’s no way ESPN is going to allow for State-Bama, State-LSU, State-UGa to be an annual game. We were always going to get OM and two mids. The question is what combo of UK/Ark/A&M is it going to be. Ole Miss’ resurgence under Kiffin, makes it much easier to justify now.
First off, whatever is decided initially should be taken with a grain of salt. It won’t last longer than 5 years, as there will definitely be more realignment before then.

But, I think we get OM, UK, Auburn. We’ll definitely get at least one traditional SEC West opponent besides OM. I think networks are going to want Bama-LSU as an annual game, meaning Bama has LSU, TN, Auburn as their 3. That should be fine with them since Auburn has been trash for the better part of a decade now.

Auburn needs a 3rd permanent on top of Bama / UGA, and it should also be a traditional West opponent. OM is out, they’ll have us, LSU, and probably Vandy. I think Ark, A&M, OU, and Texas are going to be paired up to take advantage of the SWC / Big 8 historical rivalries. Texas gets A&M, OU, and Arkansas. A&M gets Texas, LSU, and Arkansas. OU gets Arkansas, Texas, and possibly Missouri. Arkansas gets Texas, Texas A&M, and OU. They may swap some things around and give Mizzou another one of the southwest teams, maybe keep LSU and Ark as permanents, but the overall situation is that I don’t see any out of Texas, Texas A&M, LSU, Arkansas, or Oklahoma being available as a permanent opponent for Auburn. That leaves only MSU. Then also it makes sense to give us UK, as that game has been played almost every year in the modern SEC, and those are similar stature programs. Same w/ OM and Vandy.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
1,328
1,070
113
2026
2027
2028
2029
@ KentuckyKentucky@ KentuckyKentucky
@ Ole MissOle Miss@ Ole MissOle Miss
Texas A&M@ Texas A&MTexas A&M@ Texas A&M
@ AlabamaGeorgiaAlabama@ Georgia
LSU@ Texas@ LSUTexas
@ OklahomaFloridaOklahoma@ Florida
Auburn@ Tennessee@ AuburnTennessee
@ South CarolinaMissouriSouth Carolina@ Missouri
Vanderbilt@ Arkansas@ VanderbiltArkansas

Who's old enough to remember when we had five permanents (Florida, Auburn, Alabama, LSU, Ole Miss) and rotated one of the other four on every 2 years? With our luck, we will get Georgia, Bama, and Texas. . .but

IF the rumors above are right, the full rotation could look something like the above. I am assuming you would have to rotate six off/on every year to meet the "play everyone every two years" stipulation. Still looks brutal, but better and more fair than the current schedule.
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
4,642
5,207
113
The SEC already went through this exercise in 2023 when they first debated 8 or 9 game schedules - they ultimately went with 8 because the CFP announced it would expand to 12 and they wanted to see how it went.

I went back and looked and the leaked SEC 3-team permanent opponents for State were OM, Ark and A&M. I don't see that changing.
It’s also reasonable to assume that there wasn’t a lot of support for the 3 permanents that were suggested then for each team.

Really hard to say “I don’t see them changing anything from this proposal that they couldn’t get passed 2 years ago”. The CFP deal was a red herring. Ultimately they wanted the increase in revenue per school from ESPN to justify the change. And 2 years ago, ESPN was lowballing them in hopes that they would cave in and start the 9-game format in 2024.
 

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
4,346
6,447
113
A little over a month before it became official:

Screenshot 2025-08-22 at 11.12.06 AM.png

Is Steve no longer in the know?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: patdog

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
12,582
9,857
113
1755880247256.png

State at the nickel slots and not at the high stake poker table with NIL