I'll be ok with that if our P4 game is at home.
I'll be ok with that if our P4 game is at home.
Again, there's no chance that Georgia is one of our permanents. None at all. They are a lock for Auburn and Florida, and their third will either be South Carolina, Kentucky, or Vanderbilt. Literally 0% they pass up on all 3 of those to take us.I'm ok with OM and UK. However I hate playing aTm. It's not an interesting game ever, at least to me.
State v Bama is one of the longest running "rivalry" in conference history. We should play them.
Even if we don't, the sec will give us UGA or Texas or Florida. So may as well play Bama.
Going by recent success, why does ole miss get an easier schedule than us. We should have- ole miss, ark, ky
Never mind. I know. We just let them screw us just like the current two years of the hardest schedule then it changes format again so we don't get the rewarded easier schedule the next two years.
Why do you keep talking anout who wants us? Of course they want us, we’re an easy win most of the time. They don’t give a 17 about the TV, they want to win. They get the same money no matter who they play and are already saddled with enough hard opponents.Alabama doesn't want us. There's a 100% chance they get Auburn and Tennessee, and if LSU doesn't work out for whatever reason, the networks will want to match them with another big name like Texas or Oklahoma.
I won't say it's a 0% chance like Georgia because there's at least some history there, but it's unlikely
There's been a major shift on the Ole Miss boards this afternoon: Apparently, we are their rival.![]()
I think more likely SEC and ESPN pushed each other to the brink & SEC finally caved. An 8-game schedule with only 1 permanent opponent was never going to happen. The flip side of 2024-2025 schedules was never an option and ESPN knew it.Sounds like ESPN finally got the money right.
Glad to see it, although it was definitely inevitable.
That makes sense.Seems like ESPN would prefer an alliance between the SEC & ACC
I don’t think they are that strict about it. BYU has served as our “power” non-con in the past when they were independent. Washington State is Ole Miss’s “power” non-con this season.So… we have Washington State on our 2030 & 2031 schedules. They’re no longer considered a “Power” opponent. That means we’re very likely either going to have to buy those games out or keep them and add a Big Ten/Big 12/ACC opponent unless we get some waiver from the league.
Whoever it is, The SEC-ESPN conglomerate should have to PAY the buyout since this is what THEY forced on us!
Fair. The article I read specifically said “one additional high-quality nonconference opponent from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season”, but you’re right, there’s probably some leeway there.I don’t think they are that strict about it. BYU has served as our “power” non-con in the past when they were independent. Washington State is Ole Miss’s “power” non-con this season.
We need to get a rotation of Rutgers, Purdue, and Northwestern goingI think you will see a scheduling alliance with the B10
That giant ain't ever waking up at this point.We’ve beaten A&M a fair amount and gotten skill drug by Bama. I know on paper A&M is a sleeping giant, but I also hope their culture is too 17ed up to ever pull it together
This is pretty close to how it will be.So the rumor/"inside info" from a couple years ago is that the schedules would be made like this:
Higher prestige teams - Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, LSU Oklahoma, Texas, Texas A&M
Lower prestige teams - Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Everyone would get 2 permanent opponents in their own tier and 1 permanent in the other tier. So in the higher tier, the matchups might be:
And these could the permanent matchups in the lower tier. (The Tweet I had earlier was a little different in the former East teams)
- Oklahoma-Texas
- Texas-Texas A&M
- Texas A&M-LSU
- LSU-Alabama (highest rated TV game)
- Alabama-Auburn
- Auburn-Georgia
- Georgia-Florida
- Florida-Oklahoma (this one is kinda random, but Oklahoma has to get somebody)
And finally, these may be the cross-tier permanents:
- Missouri-Arkansas
- Arkansas-Ole Miss
- Ole Miss-Mississippi State
- Mississippi State-Kentucky
- Kentucky-Vanderbilt
- Vanderbilt-Tennessee
- Tennessee-South Carolina
- South Carolina-Missouri
You can swap a few of these around, but this is the mindset they are most likely going to use unless something has changed. And what has changed? Tennessee really sticks out as a "lower prestige" team now - they kinda did a couple years ago, and they really do now. So who moves down into the lower tier? Texas A&M? Oklahoma? Either of those cascades a bunch of changes throughout the above,
- Alabama-Tennessee
- LSU-Ole Miss
- Texas-Arkansas (could be Texas A&M-Arkansas instead)
- Texas A&M-Mississippi State
- Oklahoma-Missouri
- Georgia-South Carolina
- Florida-Kentucky
- Auburn-Vanderbilt (they deserve a break after getting Alabama and Georgia as their other 2)
Everyone needs to read this post. This decision was made 2 years ago. All they did for 24 & 25 was drop 1 rotating team to get to 8 games.The SEC already went through this exercise in 2023 when they first debated 8 or 9 game schedules - they ultimately went with 8 because the CFP announced it would expand to 12 and they wanted to see how it went.
I went back and looked and the leaked SEC 3-team permanent opponents for State were OM, Ark and A&M. I don't see that changing.
Don't see how they'd do that. Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky and Florida are pretty locked into the ACC.I think you will see a scheduling alliance with the B10
I think we still have WSU scheduled for a home and away in a few years - hope that countsFair. The article I read specifically said “one additional high-quality nonconference opponent from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season”, but you’re right, there’s probably some leeway there.
Would be kinda cool if we added Texas Tech those seasons and then Texas Tech scheduled Washington State. We could have a Mike Leach round robin.
I bet they’ll grandfather that one in.I think we still have WSU scheduled for a home and away in a few years - hope that counts
First off, whatever is decided initially should be taken with a grain of salt. It won’t last longer than 5 years, as there will definitely be more realignment before then.Guys, there’s no way ESPN is going to allow for State-Bama, State-LSU, State-UGa to be an annual game. We were always going to get OM and two mids. The question is what combo of UK/Ark/A&M is it going to be. Ole Miss’ resurgence under Kiffin, makes it much easier to justify now.
2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 |
@ Kentucky | Kentucky | @ Kentucky | Kentucky |
@ Ole Miss | Ole Miss | @ Ole Miss | Ole Miss |
Texas A&M | @ Texas A&M | Texas A&M | @ Texas A&M |
@ Alabama | Georgia | Alabama | @ Georgia |
LSU | @ Texas | @ LSU | Texas |
@ Oklahoma | Florida | Oklahoma | @ Florida |
Auburn | @ Tennessee | @ Auburn | Tennessee |
@ South Carolina | Missouri | South Carolina | @ Missouri |
Vanderbilt | @ Arkansas | @ Vanderbilt | Arkansas |
It’s also reasonable to assume that there wasn’t a lot of support for the 3 permanents that were suggested then for each team.The SEC already went through this exercise in 2023 when they first debated 8 or 9 game schedules - they ultimately went with 8 because the CFP announced it would expand to 12 and they wanted to see how it went.
I went back and looked and the leaked SEC 3-team permanent opponents for State were OM, Ark and A&M. I don't see that changing.
Our permanent rivals will likely be Ole Miss, Arkansas, and TAMU.Oh I’m sure we will keep OM…. But i put the chances of Bama and Georgia as high****