This is a “Greg Special” IMHO:
Canes 17
RU 31
In front of 38,500 barring a drastic change in the weather forecast.
Canes 17
RU 31
In front of 38,500 barring a drastic change in the weather forecast.
This sounds about right.We beat the depleted Canes 20- 17.
It's going to be in the 50's.RU 17 Canes 10
Its going to be cold on Thursday but revenge is best served cold
-A Klingon proverb
Weather won’t be the advantage it could have been, but even 50’s is colder than people in Florida like to get.It's going to be in the 50's.
I don’t think it’s weird . It’s a prediction thread.You know what is so weird to me...it is just strange for fans of a team(when the game is not an obvious blowout) that they would ever be predicting a loss.
some just hope Rutgers will lose so they can blame the HC.You know what is so weird to me...it is just strange for fans of a team(when the game is not an obvious blowout) that they would ever be predicting a loss.
Could be true, but predicting a Rutgers win in one bowl game isn't the same as a nfl fan predicting his favorite NFL team will go undefeated because most NFL games are toss ups.I don’t think it’s weird . It’s a prediction thread.
Take the nfl, for example. Most nfl games are toss ups. By that logic everyone would be predicting undefeated seasons
Where have you been the past 100 years ?Could be true, but predicting a Rutgers win in one bowl game isn't the same as a nfl fan predicting his favorite NFL team will go undefeated because most NFL games are toss ups.
I'd say there are some RU fans will predict losses because they are afraid to think of Rutgers as a winner and when they post about the team, that post will tend to be in the negative side , also finding ways to make positives into negatives
So true.You know what is so weird to me...it is just strange for fans of a team(when the game is not an obvious blowout) that they would ever be predicting a loss.
Where have you been the past 100 years ?
Rutgers football is not a winner lol
But I did predict us to beat Miami !
Ok just stunk at big time football.But there were times RU had HCs that won more then they lost
So Rutgers being a loser for the last 100 years isn’t exactly true, but if one wants to put down the program they can bring up overall record of 672–696–42
But these RU HCs proved Rutgers will be winners under the right HC
William A. Reynolds (1891): 8-6
F. H. Gorton (1906-07): 8-7-3
Howard Gargan (1910-12): 12-10-4
George Foster Sanford (1913-23): 56-32-5
J. Wilder Tasker (1931-37): 31-27-5
John R. Steigman (1956-59): 22-15
John F. Bateman (1960-72): 73-51
Frank Burns (1973-83): 78-43-1
even under the wrong one , RU can win
(if the moon meets your eye like a big tomato pie)
Kyle Flood (2012-15): 27-24
Glad you feel Rutgers is good enough.![]()
You know what is so weird to me...it is just strange for fans of a team(when the game is not an obvious blowout) that they would ever be predicting a loss.