1. Im glad someone has clearly pointed out that there was no loophole in the rules. People keep saying that and its not true. The loophole, as this guy points out, was created by the ruling/interpretation itself. I don't care either way, it just kept frustrating me.
2. I think KY's argument is really distinguishable. Auburn argued that newton didn't know about the facts underlying the violation. I think KY is trying to argue that Kanter didn't know what he did was a violation. That's pretty critical.
but it is funny they are doing this.